Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4203 MP
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2022
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.13911/2022 (GIRAND SINGH RAJAWAT VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Gwalior, Dated : 25/03/2022
Shri S.K.Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri P.P.S.Vajeeta, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 12/02/2022 in connection
with Crime No.47/2020 registered at Police Station Surpura,
District Bhind for offence under Sections 304-B, 34 of IPC and
Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that although,
the applicant was absconding for two years, but after his arrest all
the material witnesses including the parents of the deceased have
been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case.
The death had also occurred after six years of her marriage. At
present there is no substantive evidence against the applicant. The
Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no
possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution
case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. However, after going through the police case
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.13911/2022 (GIRAND SINGH RAJAWAT VS. STATE OF M.P.)
diary, it is submitted that all the material witnesses regarding
demand and harassment of the deceased have been examined and
they have not supported the prosecution case. However, it is
submitted that it is clear that either they have not given the correct
information to the police or they have not narrated the truth before
the Court and accordingly, they are liable to be prosecuted.
So far as the question of prosecution of the witnesses are
concerned, it is left to the discretion of the Trial Court. However, it
is directed that the Trial Court while deciding the trial shall
specifically adhere to the question as to whether the prosecution of
the witnesses is warranted or not.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is
allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees
One Lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of
the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the
dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in
case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.13911/2022 (GIRAND SINGH RAJAWAT VS. STATE OF M.P.)
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2022.03.25
18:22:13 -07'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!