Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7884 MP
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S BHATTI
ON THE 15th OF JUNE, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 11440 of 2022
Between:-
AJIT KUMAR AGNIHOTRI S/O VINOD PRAKASH
AGNIHOTRI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: TEACHER R/O SANJAY NAGAR
POST BANSAGAR, DISTRICT- REWA, (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ROHIT SOHGAURA, ADVOCATE )
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
SCHOOL EDUCATION VALLABH BHAWAN
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE COMMISSIONER, DIRECTORATE OF
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (DPI) GAUTAM NAGAR
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE COLLECTOR, R E WA DISTRICT REWA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA
PA N C H AYAT DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, REWA,
SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICT
REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. THE PRINCIPAL, VINDHYA JYOTI HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL LAKSHMANPUR,
DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI LALIT JOGLEKAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
2
following:
ORDER
The petitioner has called in question the order impugned dated 09.04.2021 (Annexure P/6) by which the similarly situated employees were absorbed in the school which was taken over by the State Government.
The grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed with Vindhya Jyoti Higher Secondary School, Lakshmanpur, District-Rewa which was being run by the Society however, later on, the Department of School Education Government of Madhya Pradesh passed an order dated 22.03.2002 by which the non-government school were taken under the control of the State
Government and accordingly, the scheme was framed to absorb the employees who were also working with the school which was being run by the Society.
However, the petitioner submits that he has not been absorbed and the other employees have been absorbed by the impugned order dated 09.04.2021. He further submits that his representation has not been considered which was submitted way back on 23.08.2021.
Without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2021 (Annexure P/7) while taking into consideration the judgments on the point by this Court, within a period of 60 days from the day of furnishing the certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed off.
(MANINDER S BHATTI) JUDGE sp SAVITRI PATEL 2022.06.16 12:24:38 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!