Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9139 MP
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
ON THE 8th OF JULY, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 14737 of 2022
Between:-
MUBARAK HUSSAIN S/O SHRI SATTAR ALI ,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
BUSINESS R/O WARD NO. 22, BADI MASZID
ROAD, VILIYS NO. 2 DHANPURI, DISTRICT
SHAHDOL, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SATYENDRA JYOTISHI - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT VALLABH
BHAWAN BHOPAL (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. M.P. STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, BHOPAL
NIRWACHAN BHAWAN 58 ARERA HILLS
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. RETURNING OFFICER, S H AH D O L DISTRICT
SHAHDOL (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. RETURNING OFFICER, NAGARPALIKA
D H AN PUR I DISTRICT SHAHDOL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. G. K. PATEL - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
(SHRI PRAYANLAGHN PANDEY - ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission and I.R. this day, th e court
passed the following:
Signature Not Verified
ORDER
SAN
In this petition, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to allow Digitally signed by VINAY KUMAR BURMAN Date: 2022.07.08 18:44:38 IST the petitioner to contest the election of Ward Member (Parshad) in Ward No.22
of Nagar Palika Parishad, Dhanpuri, District Shahdol (M.P.).
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable in view of the fact that the election has already been notified on 27.05.2022. Thereafter, nominations have been invited a n d final list of candidates has already been published on 11.06.2022. In support of his contention he has placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex court in the case of Laxmibai Vs. Collector, Nanded and others, reported in (2020)12 SCC 186 and S.K.Mahaboob Bee (Smt.) and others Vs. State Election Commissioner and others, reported in (2000)10 SCC 512 to contend that the writ petition is not maintainable after the elections have been
notified. However, he fairly stated that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing election petition after the election is over.
In view of the aforesaid enunciation of law, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedy as available to him under the law at the appropriate time.
With the aforesaid liberty, the instant petition stands disposed of.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE vinay*
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by VINAY KUMAR BURMAN Date: 2022.07.08 18:44:38 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!