Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5171 MP
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
ON THE 8th OF APRIL, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 24653 of 2021
Between:-
1. ANIT KUMAR BARSAINYA S/O SHRI BHOJRAJ
BARSAINYA , AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SUB ENGINEER E 35/2 KANCHNAR
CITY VIJAY NAGAR JABALPUR MP (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. SHAILENDRA SHARMA S/O GOPIVALLABHA
SHARMA , AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
SUB ENGINEER H.NO. 64 STREET NO. 2 NEAR
IDEAL PUBLIC SCHOOL BADBAN (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(SHRI AYUR JAIN, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PUBLIC WORK
DEPARTMENT (PWD) MANTRALAYA VALLABH
BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. ENGINEER IN CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS
D EPARTM EN T PWD BHAVAN ARERA HILLS
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS
D EPARTM EN T DIVISION NO. 1 JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS
D EPARTM EN T PWD DIVISION CHHINDWARA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI JUBIN PRASAD, LEARNED PANEL LAWYER FOR THE
RESPONDENT/STATE)
This petition coming on for admission on this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioners have filed this writ petition making a prayer that petitioners be assigned seniority in the cadre of Sub-engineer daily wager with effect from 1991 Signature Not Verified SAN
and 1996 to the petitioners no.1 and 2 respectively. Digitally signed by HEMANT SARAF Date: 2022.04.08 17:31:19 IST
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are entitled for
said seniority as per the judgment passed in WA No.17061/2010. Case of petitioners is identical to that of petitioner in WA No.17061/2010. Counsel for petitioners makes a prayer that respondent No.2 be directed to consider and decide the representation preferred by petitioners in light of order passed in said
WA.
Learned counsel appearing for State does not object aforesaid proposition. I n view of aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to petitioners to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of the order passed today within 15 days before respondent No.2, then competent authority/respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the representation by passing a reasonable and speaking order within a further period of 60 days from date of receipt of same.
No opinion is expressed on the merits of the case. With aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. C.C. as per rules.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE HS
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by HEMANT SARAF Date: 2022.04.08 17:31:19 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!