Ramesh Prasad Chaturvedi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 6573 MP

      THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                         CRA.4510/2021
        (Ramesh Prasad Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P.)
                                                                    1

Jabalpur, Dated : 20 / 10 / 2021
      Shri R.N.Dwivedi, counsel for the appellant.
      Shri Satyam Agrawal, counsel for the respondent /

Lokayukta.

Heard on the question of admission.

Appeal seems to be arguable, hence it is admitted for final hearing.

Also heard on I.A. No.18227/2021, which is an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of the custodial sentence passed against appellant Ramesh Prasad Chaturvedi.

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 29.07.2021 passed by Special Session Judge, (Prevention of Corruption) Act, Rewa in Special Case LOK No.03/2015 whereby learned Special Judge found the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 7 & 13(1)(D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 3 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and R.I. for 4 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- respectively with default clause.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that learned trial Court without appreciating the evidence properly, wrongly convicted the appellant for the aforesaid offences. From the prosecution evidence demand of bribe is not proved. Even the acceptance of bribe is also not proved. There are several omissions and contradictions in the evidence adduced by the prosecution. Appellant is in custody since the date of his judgment i.e. 29.07.2021. Hence prayed for suspension of the jail sentence and release of the appellant on bail since the hearing of this appeal will take time.

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRA.4510/2021 (Ramesh Prasad Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P.)

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent opposed the prayer and submitted that the guilt of the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, learned trial Court has rightly convicted and sentenced the appellant.

This Court has considered the respective submissions made by the parties and perused the impugned judgment passed by the trial Court. The maximum sentence of imprisonment awarded to the appellant is only four years. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai Vs. State of Gujrat, ( 1999) 4 SCC 421 has held that when a person is convicted and sentenced to a short term imprisonment, the normal rule is that when his appeal is pending, the sentence should be suspended by enlarging appellant on bail and rejection can only be by way of exception. Apex Court in the case of C. Sareen v. CBI, Chandigarh, (2001) 6 SCC 584 held that no doubt when the appellate Court admits the appeal filed in challenge of the conviction and sentence for the offence under the PC Act, the superior court should normally suspend the sentence of imprisonment until disposal of the appeal, because refusal thereof would render the very appeal otiose unless such appeal could be heard soon after the filing of the appeal. Apex Court in the case of N. Ramamurthy Vs. State of Central Bureau Of Investigation, A.C.B., Bengaluru, 2019 Cri.L.J. 2929 also held that in cases where an appeal could not be heard soon after the filing of the appeal, the superior Court should normally suspend the sentence of imprisonment until disposal of the appeal.

So looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the term of imprisonment awarded, the conduct of appellant when on bail during the trial, and the fact that appellant is in custody since 29.07.2021 and according to listing policy the hearing of this THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRA.4510/2021 (Ramesh Prasad Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P.)

appeal is likely to take a long time, the application is allowed and it is directed that the execution of the jail sentence alone passed against the appellant shall remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal and he be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 21.12.2021 and on such further dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Registry during the pendency of this appeal.

List the matter for final hearing in due course. C.C. as per rules.

                                                                               (Rajeev Kumar Dubey)
sarathe                                                                              Judge



NAVEEN
          Digitally signed by NAVEEN KUMAR
          SARATHE
          DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
          PRADESH, ou=HIGH COURT OF



KUMAR
          MADHYA PRADESH,
          postalCode=482001, st=Madhya
          Pradesh,

2.5.4.20=d66fc0344a8236bc2353c118 1fddfaa49a5daae514ecfff778d4b2893

SARATH 01cb0c1, pseudonym=ABE8CA5A4B1C369EC27 A4B261D43439A19EEBA39, serialNumber=577CF890A554B9DF82

E 7E90970157E60DAE4E547824BD58B1 84FEAB93AD55E89B, cn=NAVEEN KUMAR SARATHE Date: 2021.10.20 17:31:03 +05'30'