Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6531 MP
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021
1
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Bench Gwalior
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava
RP 364/2021
Jugal Kishore Kahar
Vs.
Panjikrit Sarvjanik Trust Murti
===================================================
Shri Prahant Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. ==================================================== Order (Passed on 08/10/2021)
Per Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J:-
The present review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC has
been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 01/04/2021 passed by
this Court in Second Appeal No.233/2021, whereby the second appeal
preferred by the petitioner was not admitted by this Court by observing
that both the Courts below have arrived at concurrent finding of fact
which is based on correct appreciation of evidence.
(2) It is submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that Second
Appeal No.751/2020 preferred by another tenant, arising out of similar
judgment and decree, has already been admitted by a coordinate Bench
of this Court vide order dated 11/08/2020. As the facts of the present
case is similar to that of Second Appeal No.751/2020 filed by another
tenant in which, original plaintiff is the same and the suit for eviction
was also filed on the similar ground qua other tenant/shopkeeper,
therefore, maintaining the principles of judicial comity and legal
propriety, it would be appropriate to maintain certainty, uniformity and
continuity in the administration of justice. Therefore, it is prayed that the
order dated 01/04/2021 passed in Second Appeal No.233/2021 may
kindly be reviewed. In support of his contentions, learned Counsel for
the petitioner has relied upon the judgments passed by the Apex Court in
the case of Bir Bajrang Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Others,
reported in AIR 1987 SC 1345 and S.L. Rooplal and Another vs. Lt.
Governor through Chief Secretary, Delhi and Ors. reported in 2000
AIR (SC) 594.
(3) Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for
the petitioner as well as the law laid down by the Apex Court, it is
apparent that the plaintiff/ respondent herein is the same and the suit for
eviction was also filed on the similar ground qua other
tenant/shopkeeper, therefore, in order to avoid conflict of authority and
to secure certainty, uniformity and continuity in the administration of
justice, this Court thinks it appropriate to review the order dated
01/04/2021 passed in Second Appeal No.233/2021. Accordingly, the
order dated 01/04/2021 stands modified and Second Appeal No.
233/2021 stands restored to its original number.
(4) Aforesaid Second Appeal No.233/2021 be listed for admission.
(Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava) Judge
MKB
MAHENDRA Digitally signed by MAHENDRA KUMAR BARIK DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
KUMAR PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474011, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=f592da990684fe30f8e1e29a4a1a9e3451 ee450d883083a8e4cc8020eee6f7cb,
BARIK cn=MAHENDRA KUMAR BARIK Date: 2021.10.08 18:57:20 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!