Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6302 MP
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
CRA-1792-2021
(NAHAR SINGH TOMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Gwalior, Dated:-01/10/2021
Shri Ajit Singh Bhadouria, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Ramadhar Chaubey, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.
Heard on I.A.No.27676/2021, second application under Section
389 of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence on behalf of appellant-
Nahar Singh Tomar.
This criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment dated
12/01/2021 passed by Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior,
Distt. Gwalior (M.P.) in ST No.29/2016 by which appellant has been
convicted as under:-
Section Sentence Fine In default
stipulation
489(g) of IPC 3 years of R.I. Rs.1000/- 01 month R.I.
489(kh) of IPC 5 years of R.I. Rs.2000/- 02 months R.I.
16 r/w section 15(1) (k) (III- 7 years of R.I. Rs.3000/- 03 months R.I. K) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for appellant- Nahar Singh
Tomar that the appellant has been wrongly convicted by the trial
Court. There are lots of contradictions and omissions in the evidence
of the prosecution witnesses. It is further submitted that appellant is
not the main accused of the case, rather as per judgment of the trial
Court wherein trial Court itself has observed that appellant is not the
main accused. It is also submitted that the appellant is in custody since
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CRA-1792-2021 (NAHAR SINGH TOMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
12/01/2021 and other co-accused of this case has already been granted
bail by this Court. The present appellant is on same footing with the
co-accused. There is no possibility of final hearing of this appeal in
near future. Hence, on the basis of parity and total custody period of
appellant, which is around eight months, learned counsel prayed to
suspend the remaining jail sentence of appellant. He further
undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions of guidance,
circulars and directions issued by Central Government, State
Government as well as Local Administration regarding measures in
respect of COVID-19 Pandemic and maintain hygiene in the vicinity
while keeping physical distancing.
Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the application
and submitted that custody period of appellant- Nahar Singh Tomar is
very short. Hence, prayed to reject this repeat application filed for
suspension of jail sentence of appellant.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material
documents available on record.
On perusal of record available, it is apparent that total custody
period of appellant is around eight months and the trial Court has
awarded the punishment of seven years rigorous imprisonment with
fine of Rs.3,000/- for offence under Sections 16 read with section
15(1) (k) (III-K) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the case
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CRA-1792-2021 (NAHAR SINGH TOMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
of present appellant is different from the case of other co-accused,
who is enlarged on bail. Therefore, considering the custody period of
appellant, which is very short, this Court is not inclined to suspend the
jail sentence of appellant - Nahar Singh Tomar.
Accordingly, I.A. No.27676/2021 is hereby dismissed.
List the case for final hearing in due course.
(Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava) Judge Monika
Digitally signed by MONIKA SHARMA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF
MONIKA MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474011,
SHARMA st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=1cbbae26c87c00013f50467 48e62527c7ddf7dd9146694af9eed9 6f47a359612, cn=MONIKA SHARMA Date: 2021.10.04 16:33:50 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!