Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Pooja Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 405 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 405 MP
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Smt. Pooja Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 March, 2021
Author: Anand Pathak
                                 1       M.Cr.C. No.11937/2021


             HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                     M.Cr.C. No.11937/2021
              (Smt. Pooja Mishra Vs. State of M.P. )
Gwalior, Dated: 02.03.2021
      Shri Deependra Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for the

applicant.

      Smt. Kalpana Parmar, learned PL for the respondent/State.

With consent heard finally.

The applicant has filed this fourth anticipatory bail

application u/S.438, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. Applicant is

apprehending her arrest in respect of registration of Crime

No.637/2020, registered at Police Station- Ambah, District-

Morena, in relation to the offences punishable under Sections

304-B, 498-A and 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry

Prohibition Act.

It is the submission of counsel for the applicant that the

applicant is apprehending her arrest on the basis of offence as

referred above. It is further submitted that applicant is sister-in-

law (tsBkuh) of deceased and she had no role to play in

commission of said offence. Counsel referred the statement of

husband of deceased recorded by the police on 08.08.2020 which

indicates that deceased committed suicide because of her

previous relationship with a boy and when relationship detected

by members of matrimonial family, then she committed suicide.

Therefore, real culprit is Pawan who was in relationship with the

deceased, not the present applicant. According to him, in previous

round of bail application, the said facts and documents could not

be presented in correct perspective by the concerned counsel /

applicant, therefore, she left out to get the benefit of anticipatory

bail whereas all other co-accused persons were granted the said

benefit because of all the facts involved in the case. No role has

to be played by the applicant and / or in other family members in

the case. However; she left out and therefore, approached this

court by way of fourth visit. She does not bear any criminal

record and charge-sheet has already been filed under Section 299

of Cr.P.C. and even otherwise, no custodial interrogation is

required in the case in hand. Therefore, he prayed for grant of

anticipatory bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State opposed the

prayer and submitted that this is fourth bail application preferred

by the applicant. However; applicant fairly submitted that

allegations against the present applicant are omnibus and all other

co-accused persons have been granted benefit of anticipatory bail.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

documents appended thereto.

This is a case where applicant has preferred fourth bail

application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. and all three previous

applications were dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of

judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of G.R.

Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu passed in SLP (Cri)

No.213/2021 dated 28.01.2021. Therefore, at that relevant point

of time, documents and other submissions were not advanced.

Although, all three applications were dismissed as withdrawn but

looking to the fact that this is fourth visit of applicant and in

fourth round of litigation, all facts in correct perspective have

been placed by the counsel.

Therefore, at this juncture instead of entertaining the said

application, this court directs the applicant in peculiar facts and

circumstances of the case to submit before the course of justice

and place all those facts and documents in support of her

submissions before the trial court and trial court shall consider all

the facts / documents as well as orders of anticipatory bail in

respect of other co-accused persons and shall pass an appropriate

order in accordance with law.

Needles to say that trial court shall hear and decide the

application of applicant as expeditiously as possible and in

peculiar facts and circumstances, if possible then on the same

day.

Application sans merit and is hereby dismissed.



                                                                         (Anand Pathak)
     Rashid                                                                  Judge



RASHID
          Digitally signed by RASHID KHAN

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT Of M P BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474011, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=23377d7d214c811801fc322b576ca4ed1954 237f6324416af3985b5e9940ed42,

KHAN serialNumber=111cc474a72b078dc9a89f3cb13bb66 8fd8e0e91beda3cb721bbd836d768b09c, cn=RASHID KHAN Date: 2021.03.03 11:18:11 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter