Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shakuntala Suryawanshi ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 1080 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1080 MP
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Shakuntala Suryawanshi ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 March, 2021
Author: Prakash Shrivastava
                                                                      1                               WP-6890-2021
                                            The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                       WP-6890-2021
                                    (SHAKUNTALA SURYAWANSHI (CHOUKSEY) AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND
                                                                        OTHERS)

                                    1
                                    Jabalpur, Dated : 25-03-2021
                                          Shri U.S. Jayaswal, learned counsel for the petitioners.
                                          Shri Ayur Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.
                                          Heard.
                                          Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that the

                                    controversy involved in the matter is finally decided by this Court in Writ
                                    Petition No.6773/2006 [ Prerna vs. State of M.P.], decided at Indore
                                    Bench. He submits that the petitioners intend to prefer representations, which
                                    may be directed to be decided by the respondents in the light of the judgment

in Prerna's case (supra), within a stipulated time.

The aforesaid innocuous relief prayed for is not opposed by the learned counsel for the State.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits and entitlement of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with the following

directions :

( 1 ) The petitioners shall prefer a detailed representation along with the judgment in Prerna's case (supra) on which he wants to place reliance and file it before the respondents within 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

(2) The respondents shall consider and examine the applicability of such judgments in the case of petitioners. In the event the authorities come to the conclusion that the petitioners are entitled for similar benefits and claims, the claims be paid to the petitioners within 60 days. The respondents while deciding the representation shall pass a reasoned and speaking order.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of.

Signature Not Verified SAN C.c. as per rules.

Digitally signed by SATEESH KUMAR SEN Date: 2021.03.31 16:06:53 IST 2 WP-6890-2021 (PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA) JUDGE ss

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by SATEESH KUMAR SEN Date: 2021.03.31 16:06:53 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter