Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2635 MP
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
1 Cr.A.No. 3124/2021
(Man Singh Kirar & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.)
Gwalior Bench:
Dated 23/06/2021
Shri Ashish Jadon, learned counsel for the appellants.
Shri Brij Mohan Shrivastava, learned PP for respondent
No.1/State.
With consent heard finally through Video Conferencing.
Perused the case diary.
Present appeal has been filed under Section 14 (A) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989 (for brevity 'the Act') against the order dated 27/4/2021 passed
by First Additional Sessions Judge, Guna, whereby the application of
the appellants under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail
has been rejected.
Appellants apprehends their arrest in connection with offences
punishable u/Ss. 323, 294, 324, 506, 147, 148, 149 and 325 of IPC
and Sections 3(1) (r) & (s), 3(2)(va) of the Act registered as Crime
No.211/2020 at Police Station Bamori, District Guna.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants informs this
court that appellants No.1-Man Singh Kirar and Govind Kirar are
going to surrender today itself before the Police Authorities and
therefore, prays for withdrawal of this appeal in respect of appellants
No. 1 and 2 and press this appeal in respect of appellants No. 3 to 8
only.
In view of aforesaid contention, appeal so far as it relates to HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
(Man Singh Kirar & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.)
appellants No. 1 and 2, is hereby dismissed as withdrawn and is heard
and considered in respect of appellants No. 3 to 8 only.
It is submitted by counsel for the appellants No. 3 to 8 that
the appellants have been falsely implicated in the case and they
have not committed any offence. It is submitted that previously,
first complaint was lodged against the complainant party by the
family of appellants being Crime No.210 of 2021 at PS Bamori
district Guna for offence under Section 148 and 149 of IPC. It is
submitted that there is no specific allegation of inflicting injuries
against the present appellants nor there is any allegation against
they present appellants of calling the complainant party by their
caste and abused them. So far as maintainability of this appeal is
concerned, they have relied upon the the judgment of this Court in
the matter of Atendra Singh Rawat vs. State of M.P.,
(2019) 2 MPLJ (Cri.) 481, whereby this Court has considered
the amended provisions of the Act and also considered Section 438
of Cr.P.C. and has allowed the application. Hence, he has prayed for
grant of bail. Appellants undertake to cooperate in investigation and
trial and would make themselves available as and when required by
the investigating officer and trial Court. Further they intend to
perform community service by serving the environment by
contributing their part voluntarily by planting saplings. On these HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
(Man Singh Kirar & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.)
grounds, prayer for suspension of sentence has been made out.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the
appeal and prayed for the dismissal of the same.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the
parties as well as the fact situation of the case, without expressing any
opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this
appeal in the following terms. Accordingly impugned order dated
27/4/2021 so far as it relates to appellants No. 3 to 8 is hereby set
aside and it is hereby directed that in the event of arrest, the appellants
No. 3 to 8 shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of
Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with one solvent
surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting
Authority/ Investigating Authority.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the
following conditions by the appellant:-
1. The appellant will comply with all the terms and conditions of
the bond executed by him;
2. The appellant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the
case may be;
3. The appellant will not indulge himself in extending inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
(Man Singh Kirar & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.)
Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The appellant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence
of which he is accused;
5. The appellant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during
the trial; and
6. The appellant will not leave India without previous permission
of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
7. ,rn~ }kjk muds vfHkHkk"kd }kjk nh xbZ opu ds vuqlkj ;g Hkh ;g
funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd izR;sd vkosndx.k 02 ikS/kksa dk ¼ Qy nsus
okys isM+ vFkok [email protected]½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iMksl esa
isM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds fy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks
lqjf{kr jg ldsA izR;sd vkosndx.k dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa
dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk]
o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^
8. izR;sd vkosndx.k fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/[email protected]+ksa dks yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz
gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosndx.k dks fjgk
fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k
o`{[email protected]/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds
lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr
fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A
9. o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k
{kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa
vkosndx.k }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj vankt ugh dj ldrk
gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj vkosndx.k }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa
,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsdx.k }kjk fd;s HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
(Man Singh Kirar & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.)
x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa
¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k ^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk
tk,xkA
10. o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd
vkosndx.k dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA
11. vkosndx.k dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/[email protected] dks jksius dh Lora=rk
gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS]
vU;Fkk vkosndx.k dks o`{kksa ds jksi.k ds fy, rFkk muds lqj{kk mik;ksa ds fy,
vko';d [kpsZ ogu djuk gksxsaA
12.bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa
rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds
lkFk ,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku
esa ekuo vfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oaa d:a.kk
dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou
dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk
iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA
13.;g funsZ'k vkosnd ds }kjk Lor% O;Dr dh xbZ lkeqnkf;d lsok dh
bPNk ds dkj.k fn;k x;k gS tks LoSfPNd gSA
14.^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d fopkj ds
vadqj.k dk gSA^^
Copy /E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned
for compliance, if possible for the office of this Court.
Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.
(Anand Pathak) Judge jps/-
Digitally signed by JAI PRAKASH SOLANKI
JAI PRAKASH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh,
SOLANKI 2.5.4.20=287738d30aabaeda9b10cecdf179cec86 5c7633f4cfb9e38ce14fcbb05b9522a, cn=JAI PRAKASH SOLANKI Date: 2021.06.24 10:47:10 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!