Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Kumar Sanwaliya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2354 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2354 MP
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mukesh Kumar Sanwaliya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 June, 2021
Author: Sujoy Paul
                               -1-




HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH AT INDORE

                   Writ Petition No.10163/2021
 Mukesh Kumar Sanwaliya v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Indore, dated 14.06.2021
         Heard through video conferencing.
         Shri L.C. Patne, learned counsel for the petitioner.
         Shri Valmik Sakargayen, learned Government Advocate
for the respondents / State.

With the consent, finally heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents decided to recover some amount along with the interest arising out of the said amount. The recovery of the interest part has been interfered with by this Court in various judgments including W.P. No.826/2017 (Rajendra Bhawsar v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others) decided on 13.09.2017, W.P. No.26972/2019 (Smt. Sobha Jadhav v/s The State of Madhay Pradesh & Others) decided on 11.12.2019, W.P. No.15132/2020 (Dinesh Nema v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others) decided on 07.10.2020, Writ Petition No.8902/2020 (Mishrilal Yadav v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others) decided on 27.06.2020, W.P. No.12829/2020 (Krishnpal Singh Chouhan v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others) decided on 03.09.2020 and W.P. No.11497/2020 (Manohar Joshi v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others) decided on 18.08.2020. Since this matter is similar, the impugned order to the extent interest is sought to be recovered may be set aside.

Learned Government Advocate for the respondents / State opposed the prayer but did not dispute that the point involved in the present case is squarely covered by aforesaid orders mentioned by Shri Patne.

Accordingly, the impugned order 15.10.2020 (Annexure- P/1) and 28.04.2021 (Annexure-P/2) to the extent recovery is made of interest component is set aside. If any recovery of interest has been made, the same shall be returned to the petitioner within three months from the date of production of copy of this order.

The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.

(SUJOY PAUL) JUDGE Ravi Digitally signed by RAVI PRAKASH Date: 2021.06.15 10:15:19 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter