Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9078 MP
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.62744/2021 (LAXMINARAYAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Gwalior, Dated : 21/12/2021
Shri D.R.Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri C.P.Singh, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This second repeat application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
has been filed for grant of bail. First bail application of the applicant
was dismissed by order dated 25/08/2021 passed in MCRC
No.41593/2021.
The applicant has been arrested on 25/05/2021 in connection
with Crime No.32/2021 registered at Police Station Kotwali Vidisha,
District Vidisha for offence under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468,
201 and 120-B of IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that although
the first bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merits by
order dated 25/08/2021, but the main accused Sachin has been
granted bail by the Supreme Court by order dated 13/12/2021 passed
in CRA No.1617/2021. It is submitted that the allegations against the
applicant are that the amount was misappropriated with the active
connivance of the applicant, who transferred a huge amount in the
account of the main accused Sachin, who was the Manager of
warehouse. Since, co-accused Sachin has already been granted bail,
therefore, the prayer for bail of the applicant may also be considered
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.62744/2021 (LAXMINARAYAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
sympathetically because not only he was a Farmer, but had no active
role to play to misappropriate the amount. Although, there are
allegations that by transferring the amount in favour of Sachin, he
actively assisted him to get the amount fraudulently credited in his
account. The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is
no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution
case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State.
In view of the fact that co-accused Sachin has been granted
bail by the Supreme Court and the case of the applicant is on slighter
lesser footing as well as the period of detention and without
commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is
directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with
one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial
Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given
by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.62744/2021 (LAXMINARAYAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2021.12.21
17:46:18 -08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!