Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saurabh Vadhwani vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 8053 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8053 MP
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Saurabh Vadhwani vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 December, 2021
Author: Anand Pathak
                                    1                          MCRC-35569-2021
          The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                  MCRC No. 35569 of 2021
    (SAURABH VADHWANI AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)


Gwalior, Dated : 01-12-2021
         Shri Anoop Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners.

         Shri Devendra Choubey, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent

No.1/State.

Shri Suresh Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainant.

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.0036/2021 at Police Station- Hujrat Kotwali, District -Gwalior for the offence under Sections 420 and 34 of IPC and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise.

It appears that parties agreed to settle the matter and therefore, joint application I.A.No.31358/2021 has been preferred at the instance of parties and they want to settle the matter. The application is duly signed by respective parties (power of attorney holder on behalf of complainant) and

same is supported by their affidavits.

The Principal Registrar of this Court has duly verified the parties, contents of application, intent and signatures of parties. Report is attached, same is perused and it appears that compromise has been reached between the parties voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion. Petitioners expressed their desire to serve National/Social cause to purge their misdeeds and/ or to express gratitude for institutions which served their cause.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/State opposed the prayer and prayed for rejection of the petition.

Counsel for the complainant argued in support of petitioners' prayer for compromise. He referred power of attorney and affidavit filed by the complainant is ready to settle the matter.

2 MCRC-35569-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the documents appended thereto.

A Lean Compromise is better than a Fat Law Suit, instant efforts of the parties indicate the same. It is expected that their bonafide gestures would continue.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments Jagdish Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another, AIR 2008 SC 1968, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2008 SC 1969, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another, (2011) 10 SCC 705, Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Parbatbhai Ahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 641, laid down that even in non-compoundable cases on the basis of compromise, criminal proceedings can be quashed so that valuable time of the court can be saved and utilized in other material cases.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the law laid down by the Apex Court, in the opinion of this Court, continuance of trial in such matter will be a futile exercise which will serve no purpose. Under such a situation, section 482 Cr.P.C. can be justifiably invoked to prevent abuse of the process of law and wasteful exercise by the courts below.

To preserve the resources and bonhomie created between the parties arises out of settlement, in the interest of justice, application for compounding the offence vide I.A. No.31358/2021 is allowed because no fruitful purpose would be served in continuation of trial. Thus, parties are permitted to compound the offence.

Considering the suggestions and after due contemplation, it appears that petitioners are ready to take some positive steps towards betterment of the society and country. Therefore, they are expected to deposit Rs. 10,000/- in favour of Army Central Welfare Fund having A/C 3 MCRC-35569-2021 No.520101236373338 of Union Bank of India, Branch Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, IFSC Code UBIN0530778 within 10 days from today.

Resultantly, the petition is allowed, subject to deposit of said amount. FIR registered at Crime No.0036/2021 at Police Station- Hujrat Kotwali District Gwalior for the offence under Sections420 and 34 of IPC and other criminal proceedings in furtherance thereto, if any, are hereby quashed.

Principal Registrar of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the Chief of Defence Staff/ex officio Secretary to Department of Military Affairs in Ministry of Defence, North Block, New Delhi for information purpose about the thoughtfulness of petitioners towards National

Cause.

Petition stands allowed and disposed of in above terms.

(ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE

neetu NEETU SHASHAN K 2021.12.0 2 16:18:51 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter