Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4830 MP
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2021
1
CRA No.96/2021
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Bench at Indore
Criminal Appeal No.96/2021
Indore, Dated 31.08.2021
Shri Pankaj Ajmera, learned counsel for appellant Sarpiya @
Sourabh s/o Ramlal Barela.
Shri Avdhesh Polekar, learned Panel Lawyer for the
respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh, on advance notice.
Heard on the question of admission.
Criminal appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 is admitted for final hearing.
No separate notice is required to be issued to the respondent /
State.
Also heard on IA No.107/2021, first application under Section
389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of
jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant.
The present appellant has been convicted and sentenced by
learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Sendhwa, District Barwani
(MP) in Special Sessions Trial No.99/2018 vide judgment dated 27 th
September, 2019, as under: -
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine amount Imprisonment in lieu of fine
366r/w120-B IPC 5 years Rs.1,000/- 1 year additional RI
376 (2) (N) IPC 10 years Rs.2,000/- 2 years additional RI
344r/w 120- IPC 3 years Rs.500/- 6 months additional RI
B
506-II IPC 2 years Rs.500/- 6 months additional RI
7 r/w 8 POCSO Act, 2012 4 years Rs.500/- 4 months additional RI
CRA No.96/2021
Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the prosecutrix
was the consenting party and she has travelled along with the
appellant from State of Madhya Pradesh to State of Maharashtra and
Gujarat and recovered after fourteen days and she in her cross-
examination has clearly stated that she used to cook meal for the
appellant and for herself while they were travelling.
Counsel has further submitted that the appellant is in jail since
last around more than three years and the final disposal of the appeal
is likely to take sufficiently long time.
Thus, it is submitted that the application for suspension of jail
sentence be allowed and the appellant be released on bail.
Counsel for the respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh opposed
the application by submitting that no sufficient ground is made out
for releasing the appellant on bail; hence the application filed by the
appellant be dismissed.
Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the
record including the depositions of the prosecutrix, this Court finds
force with the contention raised by the learned counsel for the
appellant. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered
opinion that the application for suspension of custodial sentence
deserves to be allowed.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the
case, IA No.107/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on furnishing
CRA No.96/2021
a personal bond by the appellant in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees
fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his / her regular appearance
before concerned trial Court, the execution of the custodial part of
the sentence imposed against the appellant shall remain suspended,
till the final disposal of this appeal.
The appellant, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his /
her presence before the concerned trial Court on 20.12.2021 and on
all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in
this regard.
Let the matter be listed for final hearing in due course.
C. c. as per rules.
(Subodh Abhyankar) Judge rcp
RAMESH CHANDRA PITHWE 2021.09.02 19:29:23 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!