Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hussain Dana vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 3995 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3995 MP
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Hussain Dana vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 August, 2021
Author: Anil Verma
 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE

                      CR. REV. No. 1569 / 2021
                   HUSSAIN DANA Vs. STATE OF MP
                                                                    --- 1 ---
INDORE, Dated : 05/08/2021
      Heard through video conferencing.
      Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
      Mr. Jayesh Vyas, learned PL for the respondent - State.

The present revision is arising out of the judgment of conviction dated 30/1/2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jaora, Distt. Ratlam in R.C.T.No. 382/2010. The appellant has been convicted for an offence u/S. 6 read with Sec. 9 of the M. P. Govansh Vadh Pratishedh Adhiniyam and sentenced to 6 months RI with fine Rs.1,000; u/S. 11-D of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 with fine Rs.50 and Sec. 6 read with Sec. 11 of M.P. Krishi Upayogi Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam and sentenced to 6 months RI with fine Rs.500/-, with default stipulation. The judgment of conviction has been affirmed by the first appellate Court vide judgment dated 7/7/2021 passed by the learned First Addl. Sessions Judge, Jjaora, Distt. Ratlam in Cr.A.No. 08/2019.

Learned counsel for the appellant has argued before this Court that the Courts below committed legal and factual error by passing the impugned judgment on the basis of conjectures and surmises and making certain presumptions due to which the impugned order deserves to be set aside. The applicant remained on bail during trial and pendency of the appeal. There are lot of contradictions and omissions in the present case and the applicant has been implicated falsely. It is further argued that final hearing of the present revision is likely to take a long time. In such conditions the applicant be released on bail and the execution of remaining jail sentence be suspended during pendency of the present revision.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent - State opposes the application and prays for its rejection.

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE

CR. REV. No. 1569 / 2021 HUSSAIN DANA Vs. STATE OF MP

--- 2 ---

and also the fact that applicant was on bail during trial and during pendency of the appeal, final hearing of the present revision is likely to take a long time, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present application deserves to be allowed and is accordingly hereby allowed.

The execution of substantive jail sentence awarded to applicant Hussain Dana shall remain suspended and he be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the Office / Registry of this Court on 26/10/2020 and on such other dates as may be fixed in this behalf.

The Revision is admitted for final hearing. Office is directed to requisition the record. List for hearing in due course.

Certified copy, as per Rules.

(ANIL VERMA) JUDGE KR

Digitally signed by KAMAL RATHORE Date: 2021.08.05 15:52:24 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter