Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Benny John vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 97 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 97 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Benny John vs State Of Kerala on 7 January, 2026

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
                                                         2026:KER:573
CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

                                 1


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

   WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 17TH POUSHA, 1947

                      CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

         CRIME NO.517/2023 OF Mala Police Station, Thrissur

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1711 OF 2023 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, CHALAKUDY

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 10:

    1       BENNY JOHN,
            AGED 53 YEARS
            S/O JOHNY, AINIKKAL VEEDU, KUNDOOR DESOM,
            THIRUMUKKULAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN -
            680734

    2       K T BENNY,
            AGED 62 YEARS
            S/O THOMAS, KALAPPURAKKAL VEEDU, MALA DESOM, VADAMA
            VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 627939

    3       JOHNY,
            AGED 65 YEARS
            S/O VARGHEES, CHENGINIYADAN VEEDU, IRANIKKULAM, DESOM
            KAKKULISSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN -
            627917

    4       JOSE,
            AGED 64 YEARS
            S/O VAREED, CHENGINIYADAN VEEDU, KUZHOOR, DESOM
            THIRUMUKKULAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN -
            627918

    5       JUSTIN
            AGED 48 YEARS
            S/O DAVIS, KAVALAKKATTU VEEDU, VADAMA DESOM, VADAMA
                                                       2026:KER:573
CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

                                2


          VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680732

    6     ANEESH K T
          AGED 39 YEARS
          S/O THANKAPPAN, CHENATTU VEEDU, MALA PALLIPURAM,
          DESOM, KURUVILLASSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,,
          PIN - 680732

    7     ARUNJOHNY
          AGED 39 YEARS
          S/O JOHNY, IRANUKKULAM, KUZUR DESOM, KAKKULISSERY
          VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680734

    8     ANCHAN ALI MIAH
          AGED 35 YEARS
          S/O SIRAJUL MIAH, GAYABARI, SHILDANCA, GHOKSADANGA,
          COOCH BEHAR, WEST BENGAL,, PIN - 736157

    9     KOUSHIK PRADANI
          AGED 30 YEARS
          S/O NAGULPRADHANI, MAANPUR MALIPADA TUMUDIBANDHA,
          KANDHAMAL, ODISHA,, PIN - 762107

    10    RATNAGAR BISHOY
          AGED 35 YEARS
          S/O INGRAGI BISHOY, DALISAPATA, BENARABAHAL,
          KANDHAMAL, ODISHA,, PIN - 762107


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.ARUN ASHOK
          SMT.ANASWARA K.P.




RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT &   DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2     JOSEPH BIJU
          AGED 55 YEARS
          S/O CLEETUS,PADAMATTUMMAL HOUSE,THEKKENAALUVAZHI,
                                                     2026:KER:573
CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

                               3


          POYYA VILLAGE, POYYA P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN -
          680733


          BY ADV SMT.NEENA JAMES


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                           2026:KER:573
CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

                                  4


                            ORDER

Dated this the 07th day of January, 2026

The petitioners are the accused 1 to 10 in

C.C.No.1711/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate, Chalakudy (Trial Court), which has

originated from Crime No.517/2023 registered by the Mala

Police Station, Thrissur alleging the commission of the

offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 448,

506 and 109 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction

of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all further proceedings in

the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the

registration of the crime has been amicably settled between

the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed

Annexure IV affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned 2026:KER:573 CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

Counsel for the second respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with

the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties

have resolved their disputes amicably. The second

respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not wish

to pursue the prosecution, and has no objection to the

proceedings being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the Investigating Officer has reported that the

parties have arrived at a genuine and bona fide settlement.

The State has no objection to the Criminal Miscellaneous

case being allowed.

6. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this

Court to quash criminal proceedings on the ground of

settlement between the parties have been authoritatively

laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Gian Singh v. State

of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], State of Madhya Pradesh v.

Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Naushey Ali 2026:KER:573 CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

v. State of U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78], and in a host of judicial

pronouncements. It is held that in cases where the offences

are not grave or heinous, and where the parties have

amicably settled the dispute, to secure the ends of justice,

the High Court may invoke its inherent powers to quash the

proceedings, particularly if continuation of the prosecution

would serve no fruitful purpose.

7. On an overall consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the present case, and the materials on

record, I am satisfied that: the offences alleged are not

heinous or of a serious nature; no public interest or element

of societal concern is involved; the chances of conviction are

remote in view of the settlement; and the continuation of the

proceedings would merely burden the judicial process

without advancing the cause of justice. Furthermore, the

settlement would promote harmony between the parties and

restore peace. Hence, this Court is persuaded to hold that

this is a fit case to exercise its inherent jurisdiction.

2026:KER:573 CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed. Accordingly,

Annexure AI FIR, Annexure AII final report and all further

proceedings in C.C. No.1711/2023 of the Trial Court as

against the petitioners, are hereby quashed.

SD/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rmm07/01/2026 2026:KER:573 CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 5279 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure AI A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN CRIME NO. 517 OF 2023 OF THE MALA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DATED 22/05/2023 Annexure AII A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 517 OF 2023 OF THE MALA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DATED 31/10/2023 Annexure AIII A TRUE COPY OF E-COURTS PROCEEDINGS OF C.C NO. 1711 OF 2023 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY DATED 10/06/2025 Annexure IV AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19/05/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter