Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nazeema S vs District Collector
2026 Latest Caselaw 404 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 404 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Nazeema S vs District Collector on 15 January, 2026

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
W.P.(C) No.44945 of 2025




                                       1
                                                              2026:KER:3929

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

     THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 25TH POUSHA, 1947

                           WP(C) NO. 44945 OF 2025


PETITIONER(S):

             NAZEEMA S
             AGED 21 YEARS, W/O BAKSHIGULAM MUHAMMAD,
             CHANTHAPURA, KUZHALMANNAM, ALATHUR ROAD, PALAKKAD
             DISTRICT,, PIN - 678702

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.JUSTINE JACOB
             SMT.RADHIKA S.ANIL
             SHRI.SUMESH P.S.
             SHRI.MOHAMMED SAFEER N.
             SMT.MALAVIKA RADHAKRISHNAN

RESPONDENT(S):

       1     DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
             PALAKKAD, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,,
             PIN - 678001
       2     REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
             RDO OFFICE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,, PIN - 678014
       3     THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE
             ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,, PIN - 678541
       4     VILLAGE OFFICER
             KUZHALMANNAM VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,,
             PIN - 678702
       5     AGRICULTURE OFFICER
             KRISHI BHAVAN, KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,,
             PIN - 678702

BY ADV.:
             GP SMT NIMA JACOB

        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON    15.01.2026,     THE    COURT    ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.44945 of 2025




                                        2
                                                             2026:KER:3929


                           P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                    ---------------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C) No.44945 of 2025
                ------------------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 15th day of January, 2026


                                 JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following

reliefs:

"i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit-P6 order passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same;

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider Exhibit-P5 Form-5 application and remove the petitioner's 2.3 Ares of property in Re-Sy. No. 6/23 of Kuzhalmannam Village from Exhibit-P4 Data-Bank;

iii) Issue such other appropriate writ, order, or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case; and

iv) Dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language." [SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 order

passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting Ext.P5 Form-5

application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008

2026:KER:3929

('Rules', for brevity). The main grievance of the

petitioner is that the authorised officer has not

considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am

of the considered opinion that the authorised officer has

failed to comply with the statutory requirements. The

impugned order was passed by the authorised officer

solely based on the report of the Agricultural Officer.

There is no indication in the order that the authorised

officer has directly inspected the property or called for

the satellite pictures, as mandated under Rule 4(4f) of

the Rules. There is no independent finding regarding the

nature and character of the land as on the relevant date

by the authorised officer. Moreover, the authorised

officer has not considered whether the exclusion of the

property would prejudicially affect the surrounding paddy

fields.

2026:KER:3929

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v.

Revenue Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524],

Sudheesh U v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386], and Joy K.K. v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector,

Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT 433], observed that the

competent authority is obliged to assess the nature, lie

and character of the land and its suitability for paddy

cultivation as on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive

criteria to determine whether the property merits

exclusion from the data bank. The impugned order is not

in accordance with the principle laid down by this Court

in the above judgments. Therefore, I am of the

considered opinion that the impugned order is to be set

aside.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in the

following manner:

1. Ext.P6 order is set aside.

2. The 2nd respondent / authorised officer is

2026:KER:3929

directed to reconsider Ext.P5 Form-5

application submitted by the petitioner, in

accordance with the law. The authorised

officer shall either conduct a personal

inspection of the property or, alternatively, call

for the satellite pictures, in accordance with

Rule 4(4f) of the Rules, at the cost of the

petitioner, if not already called for.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the

application shall be disposed of within three

months from the date of receipt of such

pictures. On the other hand, if the authorised

officer opts to personally inspect the property,

the application shall be considered and

disposed of within two months from the date of

production of a copy of this judgment by the

petitioner.

4. If the Authorised Officer is either dismissing or

allowing the petition, a speaking order, as

2026:KER:3929

directed by this Court in the judgment dated

05.11.2025 in Vinumon v. District Collector

[2025 (6) KLT 275], shall be passed.

Sd/-


                                            P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,
                                                   JUDGE
nvj
Judgment reserved             NA
Date of Judgment           15.01.2026
Judgment dictated          15.01.2026
Draft Judgment placed      16.01.2026
Final Judgment uploaded    19.01.2026






                                                    2026:KER:3929


APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 44945 OF 2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 17.05.2025 Exhibit -P2 A COPY OF THE LOCATION SKETCH ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P3 . A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.T.A(7) 7667 (19) DATED 09.08.2019 Exhibit -P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM-5 APPLICATION DATED 28.02.2022 Exhibit-P6 A TRUE COPYOF THE ORDER DATED 14.11.2022 BEARING NO. 827/2022 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit-P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE CURRENT STATE AND NATURE OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY Exhibit-P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 12.08.2025 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.

DCPKD/12300/2005-TM9 DATED 17.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter