Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gokul vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 2188 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2188 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Gokul vs State Of Kerala on 27 February, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
                                                               2026:KER:17844

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

    FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1947

                      BAIL APPL. NO. 987 OF 2026

    CRIME NO.1496/2025 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA

        AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.01.2026 IN CRMC NO.1528 OF 2025

OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT/RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY,

ALAPPUZHA


PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

    1       GOKUL
            AGED 28 YEARS
            SREE NANTHANAM VEEDU, VALLIKUNNAM MURI, VALLIKUNNAM
            P.O., ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN - 690501


            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.BALASUBRAMANYAN
            SMT.PRIYANKA SUSAN RAJU
            SHRI.VAISAKH J.
            SHRI.HILAL BABU
            SHRI.MUHAMMED ASHIK K.A.


RESPONDENT/STATE:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2       SHO
            NOORANADU POLICE STATION, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA,
            KERALA, PIN - 690504

            SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS    BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A. No.987 of 2026
                                       -2-


                                                           2026:KER:17844




                                  ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime

No.1496/2025 of Nooranadu Police Station, Alappuzha District.

The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 296(b),

333, 118(1) and 118(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 23.09.2025

at 3.00 p.m., a dispute arose between the applicant and one of

the colleagues of the defacto complainant named Arun Das,

who is a native of Assam, at Esquire Bar situated at Charumood

Junction in connection with cleaning of the table in the bar. The

applicant used abusive language against the victim and struck

him on the head with a beer bottle and then, the applicant left

in a motorcycle belonging to accused No.2, an "unknown

person" and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Balasubramanyan, the learned

counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A.Noushad, the learned

2026:KER:17844

Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials

are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime;

hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public

Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged

incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal

acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the

course of the investigation.

6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of pre-arrest

bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be granted as a

matter of course. The power under Section 482 of BNSS could

be exercised only when a special case is made out, that too,

recording reasons thereof. Perusal of the case diary reveals

that the accusation made against the applicant is very serious

in nature, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act

on his part. Specific overt act has been alleged against the

applicant. The defacto complainant has sustained fracture of

nasal bone in the incident.

2026:KER:17844

7. The investigation is in a preliminary stage. The

custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary for the

investigation. As rightly argued by the learned Senior Public

Prosecutor, the possibility of the applicant influencing the

witnesses and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled

out if he is released on bail. Considering the gravity of the

offence and stage of the investigation, I am of the view that

this is not a fit case where the extraordinary jurisdiction vested

with this Court under Section 482 of BNSS could be invoked.

The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE SKP

2026:KER:17844

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 987 OF 2026

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1496 OF 2025 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT DATED 23.09.2025 Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CRIMINAL MC. NO. 1528 OF 2025 DATED 13.01.2026 OF SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter