Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1490 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2026
> y ARRON SST RE SPD SA Ly a TOR RT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNASULAM PRESENT YHE HONOURARLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R. SNEHALATRA WEONESDAY, THES 11°78 pay OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 22ND MAGHA, 1847 MAT APPRAL NO. 4258 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.03.2025 IN OP (OTHERS) NO. 948 OF 2023 OF FAMILY COURT, PUNALUR APPELLANTS /RESPONDENT : * SANDERF RAVERNDRA SHARMA AGED 35 YEARS S/O RAVEEBRDRA SHARMA, VAISHARHY, NADUTHERIT, EBATTASHT VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN ~ S89895S, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATYORNET HOLDS RAVERDRA SHARMA, AGED §7 YEARS, §/O BALAKRISHNA BRATTSITSIRIPPADU, VAISHARHY, NRADUTHERI, PATYTASRY VIELIAGE, FPATHANAPURAN TALUER, ROLLAN DISTRICT, RERALA, BIN ~ 888496 4 RAVREDRA SHARMA AGED 67 XYSARS S/O BALARRISHNA BNATTATRIRIPPADU, VAISHARRY , NADUTSERT, PATTARNY VILLAGE, FPATHANADURAN TALUE, ROLLAM DISTRICT, EBRALA, BIN - SBSH85 BY ADV SRI .A.AHZAR RESPONDENTS / PETITIONER AND IRD RESPONDENT : 2 BRESHMI MURALERDRARAN ACHARY AGED 33 YEARS D/O MURALEEDHARAN ACHARY, RESHNT BRAVAN, ERATRO VARAKRU, PATTAZARY B.O., BATTAZERY VILLAGE, FPATHANAPURAN TAIUIN, ROLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, BIN - 681522, REPRESENTED THROUGH HSER POWER OF AUTORNEY HOLDER MURALERDHRAN ACHARY, AGED AY YEARS, S/O PARANESWARAN ACHARY, RESHMI BHAVAN, ERATHU VADARRU, PATTASRY &.0., PATTASHY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAN TARUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, BIN - 681 522 Matra Nos §22/ene5 & SLOf2O25 bee "7 het 3 as o hd + 2 VATSRNAVT AGED 28 YEARS O/O BAVERNDRAN SHARMA, VAISHAKHY,. NADUTHERTL, PATTASRY VILLAGE, BATRHANAPOURAN TALUX, ROLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, FIN ~ S88685 BY ADVS. SHRI. ANSU VARGHESE SERIE. E.S . SYAMRUTTAN SHRI. 7, BANULESAN SHERI .NAVEES THOMAS SHARIN P. BAULSON THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR SEARTNG ON LL.OS,. 2028, ALONG WITH Mat. Appeal. 919/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN TRE HIGH COURT OF RERALA AT RRNARULAN PRESENT FEE RONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & TNE RONOURABLE MES. JUSTICE M.B. SNERALATHA WEDNESDAY, THE 11°" pay oF FEBRITARY 2026 / 22ND MAGHA, 1947 COUR ; NAT APPEAR NO. S29 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JURGMENT IS OP (OTHERS) NO. 948 OF 2022 OF FAMILY SOUNALOUR APPELLANT (PETITIONER : RESHMI MURALEEDRARAN ACHARY AGER 33 YEARS D/O MURALEEDMABAN ACSARY, RESHMI BHAVAN, ERATHU VYARARRY, BATTASHY P.O., BARTASHY VILDAGE, PATHANAPURAN TRLUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, BIN ~- 881522, REPRESENTRE TRROUGR HER POWER OF ATEORNEY ROLDER MUBALEEDERAN ACHARY, AGED S? YEARS, 8/0 BARAMESWARAN ACBARY, RESNMI BHAVAN, BRATNHO VADARRU, PATYVAZHY P.O, , PATYTAZHY VILGAGE, PATHANAPOURANM TALURK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, RERALA, PIN - 681522 BY ADVS. SERT.ANSO VARGRESE SHERI... BANULEYAN RESPONDENTS /RESPONDENTS 1 Po 3: RS SANDREP RAVERNDRA SEARMA AGED 33 YRARS S/O RAVBENDRA SHARMA, VAISHARHRY, NADUTHERI, PATTAZRY VILLAGE, PATRANASURAM TALUR, RBOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, BIN ~- S896935 RAVERNDRA SHARMA AGED 67 YSARS S/O RALAKRIGHNA RHATTATHIRIPPADU, VAISRAKRY, NANUTHERT, PATTAZRY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA, BIN ~ 689695 Mat.A Nog 4298/2038 & 9190/2025 & SUSE IRERSTRSER 3 YAITSHNAVI. AGED 27 YEARS D/O RAVEENPRAN SSARMS,, VAISHARNY, NADUTHERI, PATTALRYE VILLAGE, BATHANAPURAM TALUS, BOLDAM DISTRICY, RERALA, PIN ~ 689695 BY ADY SHRI.P.S. SYAMRUTTAN FRTS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL RAVING COMB UF FOR RBEARTNG ON 21.02.2026, ALONG WITH Mat. Aprmeal.429/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED TRE POLLOWING: cee DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & M.S.SNENHALATHA, 3]. Mat. Appeal Nos.d29/2025 & 9190/2025 Dated thie the Lith February, 2026 MS Snehalatha, 3 When these agoeals came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for both sides subrnitted thet the disputes between the parties have been settied In the mediation held under the segis of Mediation Centre, Ernakulam and a memorandum of settlement agreement has been Aled before this Court, 3, We have examined the memorandum of settiement agreement and we notice thet it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel, The terms of the agreament are lawful and therefore the settiement arrived at by the parties is accepted. 3. Th wew of the settlement arrived at bebween the parties, Mat Appeal No.4239/2025 and Mat.A No. 9219/2025 are disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at by the parties. 4. The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the memorandum of settiement agreement and shall comply all the terms therein, which de farm part of this judgment. df DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE Sd/- ab M.E.SNEHALATHA, JUDGE 3 iss bs By - 6S bx fi # Cy re eg By wed ye is Pa ool SG iH a 32 oe y vt oot ae! > 6 ig wy a + oo thee, chews oe ce? ed % P si Fs (a void we Bis $4, cf a aed ge x Y a a, ra = ; , ap ; "2s ee om , og a Zz © # Bs a go , 4 p ' whew, % re? seg "4 Gee oon --_ fe ; a wo Be i Py é = 2 = wi a a ae mo ies oe ¢ t good we ween. t fee ae fr . a i @ } bene ee od fave wr < 5 es Fa Fa a & a BB GB & = us fe oa 2 4 a 2 e 23 Lge BS s i wt 5 eh ' a te " ge ; : * ooh a teghe x " Fad G od beg og 9 " H my Bi tod. . $83 Pee i bee id %, ' ey, o3 & im be Bi eo & a2 . e "5 eA. ne Fa fr te be Z toes i A a $s, "a whe owe es o ee ; ed yo it Sngbe ta 2 "3 Ls renee fee a Zi BE 1 ees A ia Ge & 'ad 3 ane aad cs: us a, Be $ beat 4 "as Son od "se ray ; ry, on wish Be oe pe @ -- a ee we fen # j ba te a eS zy a a * the + & pe PA Fg g A = Be » & * es 2 & e ety p Se Gs neg 4 aed rae Fisce) ote bone gens we whee wee. By & Fv a8 as oie as, wv od 6 8 oS a is Le a -- 2 & % we ke a ' "p oa " ie are Ae a ar be Kee had fe Bs % ee ae ' se wi 3 " "sy Oo ; " ££ Ct fn & a % =e es: ce ss re Pe % 2 & an fa det ie B 3 z Ea pe ra fe es i a ae a os RA . ge SB gm ¢@ & @ : % oe 5 BE ee rd and um ee a 4 ee ae j A wy ud ef Wz B key oh sf om & oy fe ig a oR " ; oe 5 ag a e e ¢ 2 & jen EB g 4 a 3 Be 2 " BS # e & e & fe eet i we ag 4 on . BA 9, oy . " a B & ae oy tet £2 i, . we a at @ ey 3 a iid . oS & a & 'gO Gi ue 3 ¢ 2 . & é A vsene cok 44 3 5 3 ra ah 2 at * a vy @ oe & a ue 2% ome be 5) bye oe Be Doce ifs o '4 ad rs, aired a ce fs a wt # A ee oe i +H Ch be good eh Za os hay "4 p E cs 3 we 1 fy ity x th, bes " ae woes ge. £, re) Fd ' 6 a & $8 a Peed Pad § 2 f ra wed Seed ~ Ae iy ep 4 7 oy mS ge O B "Bm & ~ we re B & Pe BE ery £3, 4 ee ro wee ifs @ Ay ws on ry Soin be a ge teitte pedal we ~ 4 24, yu a % * 5 ° ve ae gz % aS e ae "4 B ve of "iy wy 4 fest Fee peer ad ; * ed a Be: oe of ms von " @ wt he 2 bs : "eg a "ef i men 8 R tM o r Pd ~ .
iq
Sy)
CHAN
ny x
ay
$
&
ryt, Rast
SONI
' "
re
Ss
s
wn the da
Secs S TPO
Pe
rionth
Nt Bs aq
MRSt
b
3)
eleny
Rayvecndra Sharne
« Weighrawi
oe
FS
{Res by SOA Holder Muraleadharan Ackary }
SEF te, & = dee my
z
7) Fa be
"tS & Bt a e &
Es EG
Kd
rs
he cos $e
Eom eo
be %, 6B
i. Sandeep Ravaendra Sarma i. Rasher Muraiaedharan Achary
x
= x
~
©, x
Suneiionss.
Reanangants
od
O.The parties agrse to fle a mutual divorms petition or. in the alternative. 8
petition seeking declaration/renognition of the foreign diverce judgment, before
the Farmniy Court, Purl.
LivThe lst respondent, Reshmi Muraleercharan Achary, has mm obiection to atiawing LA. No. PL of 2025, being the substitution of document petition in OR
Others} No. 948 of S023, pending before the Ranuly Court, Puna
12. The above apoeais may kindly be disposed of in terms of this Setticment
Agreement, and this Aqrasment may farm part of fhe Judgment af {his Hon'ble
Ceart,
ated this the ¥" day of fanuary, 2026.
Sepetante:- i. Sandean Ravecadra Sharma
iRhep Sy POA Nokier Raweendra Sharm }
=. Mayeerdra Sharma
Rasuendants 3. Rashmi Muraigedharan Achary
Reg by POA Nolder Muralaadharan Achary } (
a. Waishnawi
-- ate yee "-- Vet Q ie
Counsel for the Appeltants Counsel for the Raeapendents
Gelegin) CBN cel fs de. na Res gordo The above Settoment Agrsement is authenticated by me.
Adv. Anceda Geegum (Mediatork",
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!