Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Go Kite Travels & Tours Llp vs Hdfc Bank Limited
2026 Latest Caselaw 1430 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1430 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Go Kite Travels & Tours Llp vs Hdfc Bank Limited on 10 February, 2026

WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026


                                      1


                                                            2026:KER:11883




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM

         TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 21ST MAGHA, 1947

                          WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026


PETITIONER/S:

            GO KITE TRAVELS & TOURS LLP
            HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 2ND FLOOR, FAIR MOUNT
            TOWER, MAVOOR RD, ARAYIDATHUPALAM, KOZHIKODE-
            REPRESENTED BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER
            *UMER MUQTHAR,
            PEEDIKATHODUKAYIL, S/O MUHAMMED ,
            R/O PEEDIKATHODUKAYIL, KODUVALLY,
            KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673004:

            *CORRECTED AS :
            UMER MUQTHAR , AGED 30 YEARS

            AS PER ORDER DATED 09.02.2026 IN I.A.NO.1/2026 IN WPC
            4446/2026


            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.MAAROOF
            SMT.NAFIYA SHAHALA C.K.




RESPONDENT/S:

     1      HDFC BANK LIMITED
            MAJESTIC CENTRE, KOZHIKODE, KERALA, INDIA,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PIN - 673004
 WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026


                                        2


                                                               2026:KER:11883

     2      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            KHADKI POLICE STATION, PUNE MUMBAI HIGHWAY,
            CHURCH CHOWK, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, PIN - 411003



     3      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY
            THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

            ADV.SRI. PRATHEESH CHACKO, SC
                SMT. SHEEBA G., G.P.



OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE, GP


     THIS   WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
10.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026


                                     3


                                                          2026:KER:11883




                                 JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit

freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at

the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the

Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime

registered by the Police authorities against some other persons,

in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no

way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit

freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and

Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting

instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the Bank has

received a Requisition from the Respondent No.2 for an amount WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

of Rs.1,40,000/- for debit freezing of the account of the

Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition, and hence, the Bank

has effected debit freezing of the account of the Petitioner. The

learned Government Pleader submitted that there are twelve

other Requisitions for debit freezing/marking lien on the account

of the Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition. The learned

Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Bank submitted that the

Bank has not received the Requisitions. The Respondent/Bank

is free to effect the debit freezing/lien in accordance with the

future requisitions received by it.

3. The issue is covered by the decisions of this Court in Dr. Sajeer

v. Reserve Bank of India [2024 (1) KLT 826], Nazeer K.T. v. Manager,

Federal Bank, Makkaraparamba Branch [2024 KHC 768] and Abhiraj

Rajan v. State of Kerala [2025 KHC 1676].

WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

4. This Court has been consistently issuing the directions

contained in the aforesaid decisions with two other directions for

effecting uncommunicated/further requisitions for debit

freeze/lien and making the frozen amount at the disposal of the

jurisdictional Magistrate's Court. This Writ Petition is to be

disposed of, incorporating the same directions.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following

directions:

i) The Respondent/Bank is directed to confine the order of freeze/lien

against the account of the Petitioner only to the extent of the amounts

mentioned in the orders/requisitions issued to the Bank by the Police

Authorities, and it shall be done forthwith so as to enable the

Petitioner to deal with his account and transact therein beyond that

limit.

WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

ii) The respondents - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed

to inform the Bank as to whether freezing/lien of the account of the

Petitioner will require to be continued even in the aforesaid manner;

and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

iii) On the Bank receiving the aforesaid information/intimation from the

Police Authorities, the Bank will adhere to it and complete necessary

action - either continuing the freeze/lien for such period as mentioned

therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

iv) If, however, no information or intimation is received by the Bank in

terms of direction (ii) above, the Petitioner will be at full liberty to

approach this Court again; for which purpose, all his contentions in

the Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to him, to impel in the

future.

WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

v) The Police Officer concerned shall inform the Bank whether the

seizure of the Bank Account has been reported to the jurisdictional

Magistrate, and if not, the time limit within which the seizure will be

reported. If no intimation as to the compliance or the proposal to

comply with Section 102 Cr.P.C. (Section 106 BNSS) is informed to

the Bank within three months of receipt of a copy of the judgment, the

Bank shall lift the freeze/lien imposed on the Petitioner's account.

vi) In order to enable the police to comply with the above direction, the

Bank as well as the Petitioner shall forthwith serve a copy of this

judgment to the officer concerned and retain proof of such service.

vii) The directions of this Court in this judgment will not stand in the way

of the Bank effecting freezing/lien based on the requisitions

communicated in the future to the Bank with respect to the same

account of the Petitioner, and in such case, the Petitioner will be at

liberty to challenge the same.

WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

viii) The frozen/lien amount, if any, lying in the account of the Petitioner in

accordance with the aforementioned directions, shall be at the

disposal of the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE Shg/ WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

2026:KER:11883

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 4446 OF 2026

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL TRAIL BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BANK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter