Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Janarthanan vs The State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 1026 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1026 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V.Janarthanan vs The State Of Kerala on 2 February, 2026

W,P(C) No.3169 of 2026



                             .    .1..
                                                   2026:KER:8440


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

    MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 13TH MAGHA, 1947

                         WP(C) NO. 3169 OF 2026

PETITIONERS:

     1       V.JANARTHANAN
             AGED 58 YEARS, S/O VELUSWAMI CHETTIYAR,
             115-1, SESI AVENUE,AFTER TEX PARK, KALAPATTI,
             COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU PIN-641 048
             REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SALESH.S.
             S/O SASI, 9-120, BETHANY NIVAS, VEERAPANDI VILLAGE,
             CHINNATHADAGAM ROAD, ANAKATTI P.O COIMBATORE,
             TAMILNADU PIN-, PIN - 641108

     2       JYOTHIMANI .J
             AGED 57 YEARS, W/O V. JANARTHANAN,
             115-1, SESI AVENUE,AFTER TEX PARK, KALAPATTI,
             COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU PIN-641 048 REPRESENTED BY
             POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SALESH.S, S/O SASI , 9-
             120, BETHANY NIVAS, VEERAPANDI VILLAGE,
             CHINNATHADAGAM ROAD, ANAKATTI P.O COIMBATORE,
             TAMILNADU, PIN - 641108


             BY ADV SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD


RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE STATE OF KERALA
             HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
             PIN - 695001
 W,P(C) No.3169 of 2026



                             .     .2..
                                                           2026:KER:8440


     2       THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
             THE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PUDUPALLITHERUVU,
             NURANI, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

     3       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
             SHOLAYUR POLICE STATION, SHOLAYUR, PALAKKAD
             DISTRICT, PIN - 678581

     4       RODIYAN @ RANKAN
             S/O KARA VECHUPATHI, SHOLAYUR,
             AGALI, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678581

     5       JYOTHIMANI
             W/O RANKAN VECHUPATHI, SHOLAYUR,
             AGALI , PALAKKAD, PIN - 678581

     6       MURUKAN
             S/O RANKAN VECHUPATHI, SHOLAYUR,
             AGALI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581


             BY ADVS.
             SHRI.ANEESH K.R
             SHRI.JOSEPH BEN



      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   02.02.2026,     THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W,P(C) No.3169 of 2026



                                 .      .3..
                                                                  2026:KER:8440




                               J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2026

Petitioners are the plaintiffs in the suit O.S.No.355/2024

pending before the Munsiff Court, Agali. As per Ext.P1

interim application, the petitioners sought for an interim

relief restraining trespass at the hand of the defendants,

from taking yields from the property, for fencing the

boundaries, as also, from disturbing the peaceful possession

of the property by the plaintiffs, pending disposal of the

suit. When the suit was moved on 06.10.2023, an ex-parte ad

interim order was passed, as could be seen from the backside

of Ext.P1 Order, which is extracted herebelow:

"The respondents/defendants and their henchmen are hereby restrained from trespassing into the petition schedule property and from obstructing the petitioner's and their men from peaceful enjoyment and possession of the petition schedule property until further order."

. .4..

2026:KER:8440

2. The relief for preventing the defendants from causing

any obstruction to the plaintiffs in fencing the property -

though sought for - has not been granted. Learned counsel for

the petitioners would submit that more than 47 postings are

over, despite which, the interim order reflected in Ext.P1

has not been made absolute. On such premise, the petitioners

seek police protection to fence their property. This Court

directed notice by special messenger to respondents 4 to 6.

Despite service, they have not chosen to appear before this

Court.

3. Learned Government Pleader, on behalf of respondents 1

to 3, would submit that there is popular resistance by the

tribals against the petitioners' attempt to fence the

property.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, as

also, the learned Government Pleader, this Court notice that

a relief for police protection cannot be granted, when the

. .5..

2026:KER:8440

subject matter is pending consideration before a Civil Court.

By the Order reflected in Ext.P1, an interim injuction has

already been granted. If the petitioners insist for an Order

enabling fencing without any obstruction from the

respondents/defendants, the same is also liable to be

considered by the learned Munsiff, inasmuch as the same is a

prayer sought for in Ext.P1. Going by the submission made by

the learned counsel for the petitioners, despite 47 postings,

the Order reflected in Ext.P1 has not been finalized.

5. In the circumstances, this Court directs the learned

Munsiff, Agali, to consider and pass Orders in the

petitioners' prayer for granting an injuction against the

defendants in the suit from causing any obstruction to the

petitioners fencing their property. Let the above exercise be

completed within a period of one month from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that,

such Order shall be passed after affording an opportunity of

being heard to the defendants in the suit. In case the relief

. .6..

2026:KER:8440

as sought for by the petitioners herein is granted by the

learned Munsiff, and in case any obstruction is still caused,

the learned Munsiff will ensure that the Order passed is

enforced, if necessary, by ordering police protection.

Needless to say that, if there is any threat to the life of

the petitioners, the 3rd respondent will offer adequate police

protection.

The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand disposed of, as above.

Sd/-

                                                   C. JAYACHANDRAN
                                                        JUDGE
TR




                             .    .7..
                                                       2026:KER:8440


                  APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3169 OF 2026

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1               A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM APPLICATION

DTD 04-10-2023 FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FILED AS IN I.A NO 1085/2023 IN O.S NO 207/2023 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE MUNSIFF COURT, MANNARKKAD AND THE INTERIM ORDER DTD 06-10-2023 RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 AND THEIR HENCHMEN FROM OBSTRUCTING THE PETITIONERS' AND THEIR MEN FROM PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT AND POSSESSION OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 04-08-2025 IN TLA CASE NO. 65/88 ISSUED BY THE SUB COLLECTOR, OTTAPPALAM Exhibit P3 A TRUE COY OF THE COMPLAINT DD 21-01-2026 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT SEEKING POLICE PROTECTION Exhibit P4 A TRUE COY OF THE COMPLAINT DD 21-01-2026 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 A TRUE COY OF THE COMPLAINT DD 21-01-2026 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD 21-01-2026 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter