Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Baby Joseph vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 9278 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9278 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2025

Kerala High Court

Baby Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 29 September, 2025

                                                          2025:KER:72826
WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

                                    1


                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ

         MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 / 7TH ASWINA, 1947

                         WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025


PETITIONER(S):

              BABY JOSEPH
              AGED 66 YEARS
              S/O JOSEPH, GOVERNMENT FOREST CONTRACTOR, THAYYIL HOUSE,
              TEEKOY, P.O. KOTTAYAM, PIN - 656580


              BY ADV SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR


RESPONDENT(S):

     1        STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND
              WILDLIFE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     2        ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR
              (FOREST MANAGEMENT), FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

     3        CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
              CENTRAL CIRCLE, PRIYADARSINI NAGAR, PARAVATTANI,
              THRISSUR, PIN - 680005

     4        DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
              DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICE, KOTHAMANGALAM,
              KOTHAMANGALAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686691



OTHER PRESENT:

              SRI.T.P.SAJAN, SPL. G.P. (FOREST)


         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

29.09.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                     2025:KER:72826
WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

                                 2



                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to

ensure that, while fixing the transportation cost for moving

timber from the forest teak plantation to the sales depots, the

transportation cost for moving timber from inside the forest to

the public road by small trucks, and thereafter from the public

road to the sales depot by trailer lorries, are fixed separately

before issuing any tender notification for working down the

timber.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he entered into

an agreement with the department to transport forest goods

from the coop inside the forest. As per the Forest Code Vol. III

of the Forest Department, teak timbers extracted from teak

plantations are categorized as follows:

1. Lengthy logs (above 8 to 7 metres in length),

2. Lengthy logs (between 6 to 7 metres in length), and

3. Short logs (below 6 metres, down to 2.4 metres in

length), and 4. Very short logs (below 2.4 metres).

As per the usual practice, timber logs of average 6 metres in 2025:KER:72826 WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

length fetch the highest market price. Hence, the Forest

Department's normal practice is to ensure that teak timber

logs, averaging 6 metres in length, are extracted from the teak

plantations deep inside the forest and transported by forest

contractors to timber sales depots in cities and towns via

public roads. For this purpose, the use of small trucks with a

cubic capacity of 6 cubic metres was permitted, as evidenced

in Exts.P1 and P2.

3. However, the petitioner points out a difficulty: due

to the extended length of the logs beyond the platform,

transporting them violates the provisions of the Motor Vehicles

Act, making it impossible to carry out the transportation. On

that basis, the petitioner earlier filed W.P.(C) No. 20932/2025

and secured the interim order marked as Ext.P4. In compliance

with the directions therein, the government has passed Ext.

P5.

4. It is now submitted by the counsel for the petitioner

that although permission was granted in paragraph 4 of

Ext.P5, the tender conditions, especially item 22 in Ext.P9, are

not revised in accordance with the permissions granted in 2025:KER:72826 WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

paragraph 4 of Ext.P5.

5. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has

submitted Ext.P10 representation before the DFO,

Kothamangalam. He has also submitted Exts.P6 and P7

representations to the Honourable Minister of Forest and

Wildlife, as well as the Chief Conservator of Forests. Despite

these efforts, no variation has been made in item 22 of Ext.P9

with respect to the rate to be quoted. Given this situation, the

petitioner sought a direction from the DFO, Kothamangalam to

consider his grievance in this regard as stated in Ext.P10.

6. In response to the petitioner's contentions, the

learned Special Government Pleader for Forest submitted that

it is the petitioner's duty to know the existing conditions

before entering into the contract as evident in paragraph 11 of

Ext.P8. They will not object if the petitioner carries out the

work in accordance with paragraph 4 of Ext. P5. The rates

quoted in paragraph 22 of Ext. P1 are as per the rules.

7. Taking note of these contentions and recording the

statements, there will be a direction to consider Exts.P6 and

P10 by the respective respondents after affording the 2025:KER:72826 WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

8. For this purpose, the petitioner shall appear before

the 4th respondent - DFO on 06.10.2025 at 11 a.m. for a

hearing for the consideration of Ext.P10 representation. The

petitioner is free to raise all his apprehensions with respect to

the loss to be occurred by carrying out the work as per

paragraph 4 of Ext.P5. The 4th respondent, DFO shall consider

the contentions of the petitioner in accordance with law and

pass appropriate orders. The entire exercise shall be

completed within a period of two weeks from 06.10.2025.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

P.M.MANOJ JUDGE rkr 2025:KER:72826 WP(C) NO. 35960 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35960/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. G.O.(MS) NO. 184/79/AD DATED 28.01.1979 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.

G.O.RT.NO.48/80/AD DATED 08.01.1980 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(MS) NO.

7/2007/F&WLD DATED 24.02.2007 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C).NO.20932/2025 DATED 21.08.2025 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER, GO(RT).

NO.354/2025/F&WLD DATED 18.08.2025 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, HIGH RANGE CIRCLE, DATED 16.12.2024 Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE MINSTER OF FOREST AND WILDLIFE DATED 20.11.2024 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION KFDDO/28891/2025/DFOKGLM L2 DATED 20.09.2025 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF PERCENTAGE BOQ, ESTIMATE FOR THE COST OF FINAL THINNING OPERATIONS IN 1982 TP PONGANTHODU UNDER VELOOR FOREST STATION IN THODUPUZHA RANGE DURING 2005-26 Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 24.09.2025

//True Copy// PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter