Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Khalid vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 9999 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9999 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Khalid vs State Of Kerala on 23 October, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
CRL.MC NO. 8795 OF 2025         1

                                                      2025:KER:78843

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 1ST KARTHIKA, 1947

                       CRL.MC NO. 8795 OF 2025

        CRIME NO.33/2006 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM

        IN LP NO.83 OF 2007 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

TIRUR

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:

             KHALID,
             AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. MOIDHEEN BHAVAKUTTY, EENINTHE
             PURAKKAL HOUSE, PADINJAREKKARA P O., TIRUR TALUK,
             MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676562

             BY ADV SRI.BINU V V VEETTIL VALAPPIL
RESPONDENTS/STATE, DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND INJURED:

    1        STATE OF KERALA,
             REPRESENTED THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031
    2        DIRAR,
             AGED 52 YEARS
             S/O. HASSAINAR, ARAYACHANTE PURAKKAL, PADINJAREKKARA
             P. O., TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.,
             PIN - 676562
    3        SIDHICK,
             AGED 63 YEARS
             S/O. KUNJIMOIDEENKUTTY, PUTTUMANAKATH, AZHEEKAL,
             LIGHT HOUSE ROAD, PONNANI, PONNANI TALUK,
             MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679577

             BY ADV SHRI.MANEKSHA D.
             SR PP SRI M P PRASANTH
        THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8795 OF 2025      2

                                                 2025:KER:78843



                          ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2025

The petitioner is the 3rd accused in L.P.No.83/2007 on

the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Tirur,

which arises out of Crime No.33/2006 registered by the

Tirur Police Station, Malappuram, as against the accused

persons for allegedly committing the offences punishable

under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 read

with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court under

Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023, to quash Annexure A First Information Report and

Annexure B Final Report and all further proceedings in the

above crime. It is averred in the criminal miscellaneous

case that the dispute that led to the registration of the

crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and

the respondents 2 and 3 (injured), who have affirmed

Annexures C and D affidavits, vouching for the settlement.

2025:KER:78843

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the

learned Counsel for the respondents 2 and 3.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with

the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties

have resolved their differences amicably. The respondents

2 and 3 are no longer desirous of pursuing the prosecution

and has no objection in the proceedings being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that even though the Investigating Officer has

reported that the petitioner has arrived at a bone fide

settlement with the respondents 2 and 3, who have

voluntarily executed Annexures C and D affidavits, one of

the injured namely CW2 has not been identified till date.

The records are not traceable since the crime is of the year

2006.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,

the respondents 2 and 3 are the ones who suffered the

2025:KER:78843

grievous hurt. Moreover, by judgment dated 27.02.2009 in

S.C.No.331/2008, the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc)-I,

Manjeri, had acquitted the accused 2, 4, 5 and 7 in the

same crime since the prosecution had miserably failed to

prove beyond reasonable doubt that the said accused

persons had committed the above offences. Similarly, the

proceedings as against the 1st accused was quashed as per

the order in Crl.M.C No.1776/2019. The petitioner is

actually in a better position than the above said accused

persons. Therefore, this Court may not insist for recording

the statement of CW2.

7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Gian Singh v. State

of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], State of Madhya

Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC

688], Naushey Ali v. State of U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78], and

in a catena of decisions, has authoritatively held that in

cases where the offences are not grave or heinous,

involving mental depravity, and where the parties have

amicably settled the dispute, the High Court, to secure the

2025:KER:78843

ends of justice, may invoke its inherent powers to quash the

proceedings, particularly if continuation of the prosecution

would serve no fruitful purpose.

8. On a consideration of the facts and materials on

record, particularly the fact that the respondents 2 and 3

have executed Annexures C and D affidavits in favour of

settlement, and the Trial Court had acquitted the accused

2, 4, 5 and 7 and this Court had quashed the proceedings as

against the 1st accused, I am satisfied that the petitioner is

also entitled to get the proceedings quashed as against him.

Moreover, the offences alleged against the petitioner are

not heinous or of a serious nature, involving mental

depravity; no public interest or element of societal concern

is involved; the petitioner do not have criminal antecedents;

the respondents 2 and 3 have voluntarily executed the

affidavits; the chances of conviction are remote in view of

the settlement; and the continuation of the proceedings

would merely burden the judicial process without advancing

the cause of justice. Furthermore, the settlement would

2025:KER:78843

promote harmony between the parties and restore peace.

Hence, this Court finds this as a fit case to exercise its

inherent jurisdiction.

In the result, the Crl.M.C is allowed. Accordingly,

Annexure A First Information Report and Annexure B Final

Report in Crime No.33/2006 of the Tirur Police Station and

all further proceedings in L.P.No.83/2007 on the file of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Tirur, as against the

petitioner, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

NAB

2025:KER:78843

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR REGISTERED BY THE TIRUR POLICE IN CRIME NO.33/2006 ANNEXURE B CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.33/2006 OF TIRUR POLICE ANNEXURE C AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 17/09/2025 ANNEXURE D AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/INJURED DATED 17/09/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter