Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod vs Cial (Cochin International Airport ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 9578 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9578 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Vinod vs Cial (Cochin International Airport ... on 10 October, 2025

Author: T.R.Ravi
Bench: T.R.Ravi
                                                2025:KER:75232
WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

                              1
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

 FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 18TH ASWINA, 1947

                     WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

         VINOD
         AGED 59 YEARS
         S/O V R SIVANANDAN, RESIDING AT VILLA NO19, DEW
         HOMES VILLAS, NEDUMBASSERY P O, ERNAKULAM, PIN -
         683585


         BY ADVS.
         SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS
         SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH
         SHRI.SACHIN.P.K
         SHRI.VARGHESE XAVIER




RESPONDENTS:

    1    CIAL (COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD)
         REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KOCHI
         AIRPORT PO KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 683111

    2    THE CHAIRMAN
         CIAL (COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD), KOCHI
         AIRPORT PO KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 683111

    3    COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD
         REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL
         AIRPORT, NEDUMBASSERY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683111
                                                    2025:KER:75232
WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

                                 2
    4       MANAGING DIRECTOR
            COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD.
            (CIASL),COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
            NEDUMBASSERY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683111


            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.ABEL TOM BENNY
            SRI.D.PREM KAMATH
            SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL)
            SHRI.AARON ZACHARIAS BENNY
            SHRI.ALAN J YOGYAVEEDU
            SMT.JYOTHIKA KRISHNA
            SHRI. MATHEW ANGELO DAVIS
            SMT.ANANDITHA RAJEEV
            SRI. SUJIN, SC, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
            LIMITED




     THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   10.10.2025,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                       2025:KER:75232
WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

                                    3




                           T.R. RAVI, J.
           --------------------------------------------
                 W.P(C). No. 34153 of 2025
               --------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 10th day of October, 2025

                          JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed seeking to quash

Ext.P17 and for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to

reconsider Exts.P15 and P16 representations submitted by

the petitioner. The respondents in this case is the Cochin

International Airport Ltd (CIAL). The question whether the

writ petition will be maintainable against the petitioner

was considered by this Court in the judgment in

W.P(C).No.7219 of 2014 and the learned Single Judge

categorically held that a writ petition would not lie under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. On another occasion, the matter came up

before a Division Bench of this Court in Shiv Mohan vs.

Cochin International Airport Limited and Others in 2025:KER:75232 WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

W.A.No.552 of 2020 and the Division Bench confirmed the

said view. The counsel for the petitioner relied on the

judgment of the High Court of Bombay in Writ

Petition.No.12161 of 2019 to submit that the right to leave

encashment is akin to salary, which is property under

Article 300 A of the Constitution of India and the employee

can approach the Court for relief. However, it was a case

where the respondent fell within the definition of "State"

and was amenable to writ jurisdiction. The principle laid

down there will not apply in the case of the respondent

herein.

In view of the categoric pronouncement, this writ

petition cannot be held to be maintainable. The writ

petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the

petitioner to move to the appropriate forum for the reliefs

prayed for.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

LEK 2025:KER:75232 WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34153/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER NO.

CIASL/P&A/120/2017/05 DATED 22.02.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER GIVING ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF LMM POST Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER NO.

CIASL/P&A/120/2018/60 DATED 10.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER (F&A) ASSIGNING SPECIAL DUTIES TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER NO.

CIASL/P&A/120/2024 DATED 05.09.2024 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT REMOVING PETITIONER FROM THE POST OF LMM Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR BEARING NO. CIASL/P&A-268/2024 DATED 18.09.2024, INVITING APPLICATIONS FOR THE LMM POST AND RELATED COMMUNICATIONS ARE PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.09.2024 BEFORE THE CHIEF MINSTER OF KERALA WHO IS THE CHAIRMAN OF CIASL, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE E-MAIL COMMUNICATION, RESPONSE TO THE EXHIBIT P5 DATED 10.10.2024 TO THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY ONE BINDU P DAS, Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO THE EXT P6 THROUGH E-MAIL DATED 14.10.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16.10.2024 BEFORE THE CHIEF MINSTER OF KERALA SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RESIGNATION LETTER DATED 23.10.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT 2025:KER:75232 WP(C) NO. 34153 OF 2025

Exhibit P10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RESIGNATION LETTER DATED 23.10.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AFTER THE ALTERATION OF THE STATED GROUNDS FOR RESIGNATION BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P11 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE LETTER NO.

CIASL/P&A/107/2024 DATED 23.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE CIASL TO THE PETITIONER STATING THE WAIVER REQUEST OF SERVICE BOND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED Exhibit P12 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BOND AGREEMENT DATED 11.08.2021 BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE CIAS Exhibit P13 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.01.2025 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT REQUESTING FOR BOND WAIVER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P14 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO. CIASL/P&A/107/2024 DATED 13.01.2025 ISSUED BY THE CIASL TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P15 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.05.2025 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P16 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.05.2025 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P17 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 11.07.2025 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CIAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter