Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jamil Mohammed vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 9448 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9448 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Jamil Mohammed vs State Of Kerala on 8 October, 2025

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
B.A.No. 8427 of 2025

                                 ..1..

                                                  2025:KER:74248


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

 WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 16TH ASWINA, 1947

                   BAIL APPL. NO. 8427 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.16 of 2024 OF CRIME BRANCH POLICE STATION, IDUKKI

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

           JAMIL MOHAMMED
           AGED 47 YEARS, S/O MOHAMMEDKUTTY,
           ERACHAMVEETTIL, ORUMANAYOOR P.O,
           THRISSUR NOW RESIDING AT VILLA #P76,
           CAMINO-3, DUABILAND,
           DUBAI, PIN - 680512

           BY ADVS.
           SHRI.JOY GEORGE
           SMT.PRAICY JOSEPH
           SMT.TANYA JOY


RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
    2      THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE-II
           CRIME BRANCH,
           OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
           THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685584
    3      DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE-I
           CRIME BRANCH,
           OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
           KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682301
 B.A.No. 8427 of 2025

                                    ..2..

                                                          2025:KER:74248


    *4     SHEMI MUSTHAFA
           D/O MUHAMMADH MUSTHAFA KHANI RAVUTHAR,
           SHEMI MANZIL, VETTIMUKAL (P.O),
           ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM, KERALA PIN -695607

           *[ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
           08.08.2025 IN CRL MA 1/2025 IN BA 8427].

           BY ADVS.
           SRI.P.K.VARGHESE
           SHRI.RAMEES P.K.
           SHRI.ADITHYA VARMA S.
           SRI.P.NARARYANAN-SPL.GP


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.10.2025,   THE      COURT   ON    THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 B.A.No. 8427 of 2025

                                 ..3..

                                                     2025:KER:74248


                            ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest

bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 16

of 2024 of Crime Branch Police Station, Idukki. The offences

alleged are punishable under Sections 120B of 302, 307 and

201 r/w Section 34 of the IPC.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that while the de-

facto complainant was coming downhill in his Land Rover

Defender car bearing registration No. TO-623-KL-9627 from

Mankulam to Ettumanoor in the evening on 16.09.2023, a

Toyota Innova car bearing registration No. KL-53-G-2480

travelling in the same direction attempted to collide with the

Defender vehicle with intent to topple it. It is alleged that if

its driver had not swerved, the vehicles would have collided

with each other and his car would have toppled down into the

..4..

2025:KER:74248

valley injuring him fatally. According to the prosecution, the

accused No.1 conspired with the remaining accused and

attempted to kill the defacto complainant by colliding the

Toyota Innova car bearing registration No. KL-53-G-2480

driven by the accused No.6 with the Land Rover Defender car

bearing registration No. TO-623-KL-9627 of the defacto

complainant.

4. I have heard Sri. Joy George, the learned counsel

for the applicant, Sri.P.K.Varghese, the learned Additional

Public Prosecutor and Sri. P.Narayanan, the learned Special

Government Pleader. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted

that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated

in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no

materials are on record to connect the applicant with the

alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. The learned

Special Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the

..5..

2025:KER:74248

defacto complainant, on the other hand, submitted that the

alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal

acts of the applicant, and if he is granted pre-arrest bail, it

will affect the course of the investigation. It is further

submitted that custodial interrogation of the applicant is

inevitable.

6. A detailed objection statement has been filed by

the investigating officer.

7. Admittedly, the applicant was not travelling in the

Toyota Innova car involved in the accident. It has come on

record that at the time of the alleged incident, he was

abroad. It is also pertinent to note that neither the defacto

complainant nor anyone in the vehicle has sustained any

injury. According to the prosecution, due to the business

rivalry between the applicant and the defacto complainant,

the applicant wanted to do away with the defacto complainant

and accordingly he conspired with the remaining accused and

..6..

2025:KER:74248

intentionally caused the alleged accident. The learned Special

Government Pleader relied on the digital evidence collected

so far, pertaining to certain WhatsApp chats and telephone

conversations between the applicant with one of his

associates namely Shanavas and his brother Shiras who is

the driver of the defacto complainant. The prosecution also

relied on the calls made between the applicant and accused

No.2 and accused No.2 with accused No.3. I went through the

case records. It is true that there were several chats and

contact over the phone between these persons prior to and

after the incident. But that alone is not sufficient at this

juncture to connect the applicant with the incident. In the

investigation conducted so far, there is nothing on record to

suggest any overt act committed by the applicant. Further,

the case diary reveals that there was no damage at all to any

of the vehicles involved in the accident. Nobody in the

vehicles sustained any injury also. The applicant has no

..7..

2025:KER:74248

criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled

against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does not

appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case

where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event

of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees

One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each

to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer,

as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the

investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed

police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating

officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday

until further orders. He shall also appear before the

..8..

2025:KER:74248

investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like

nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of

the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other

person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence

or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the

investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala

without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of

bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of

violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional

court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE APA

..9..

2025:KER:74248

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8427/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 1215/2023 DATED 30.09.2023 ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

D2/17768/2024/PHQ OF THE STATE POLICE CHIEF DATED 02.02.2024 ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF IDUKKI HANDING OVER THE FILE TO CRIME BRANCH DATED 03.02.2024 ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 16/2024 DATED 07.02.2024 REGISTERED U/S 120B R/W 308 IPC BY RENUMBERING ANNEXURE A1 ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REPORT CHANGING THE SECTION OF OFFENCE IN ANNEXURE A1 DATED 16.03.2024 ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.09.2023

ANNEXURE A7 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT DATED 13.12.2024 IN SLP CRL NO. 17082-17086/2024 ANNEXURE A8 TRUE COPY OF THE FACT-FINDING REPORT OF THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI DATED 24.10.2024 ANNEXURE A9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 15.02.2025 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CRIME BRANCH ERNAKULAM ANNEXURE A10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE STATE POLICE CHIEF AGAINST ANNEXURE A9 REPORT DATED 19.05.2025

..10..

2025:KER:74248

RESPONDENT ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE R4(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/09/2023 BEFORE THE STATE POLICE CHIEF, KERALA ANNEXURE R4(B) THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION REPORT FILED BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE-II CRIME BRANCH IDUKKI DATED 21.06.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter