Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 92 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
2025:KER:33608
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 16TH VAISAKHA, 1947
BAIL APPL. NO. 5586 OF 2025
CRIME NO.477/2025 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.04.2025 IN BAIL APPL. NO.4478 OF 2025 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
SHEREEF
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O KHADER, KUZHIKANDATHIL HOUSE, MADATHIKKARA DESAM, PULLUR
VILLAGE,THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680683
BY ADVS.
MANUMON A.
REBIN VINCENT GRALAN
SURESH C.
ROSNA M. JOY
AVIN KRISHNA M.P.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
PIN - 682031
2 SHO
IRIJALAKUDA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680125
SRI E C BINEESH -SR PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.05.2025,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:33608
B.A.No. 5586 of 2025
2
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J.
----------------------------------------
B.A. No.5586 of 2025
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of May, 2025
ORDER
This bail application is filed under Section 483 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter
referred as 'BNS' for short).
2. The petitioner herein is the 2nd accused in Crime
No.477 of 2025 of Irinjalakuda Police Station, Thrissur. The
above case is registered against petitioner for the
offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110
and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The prosecution case is that on 16.03.2025 at
about 7.30 p.m., the accused attacked the defacto
complainant with an iron rod, manhandled him and
thereby caused injuries.
4. Heard, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner/2nd accused 2025:KER:33608
contended that the petitioner is innocent. It was pointed
out that there is no allegation that the petitioner used any
weapon for attacking the defacto complainant and the
only allegation is that he manhandled the defacto
complainant. The learned counsel for the petitioner
further submitted that the 1st accused, against whom
there is allegation of attack by using weapon for
committing the offence, was already released on bail.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail
application on the ground that the petitioner has criminal
antecedents and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled
to bail.
7. The petitioner/2nd accused is in judicial custody
from 17.03.2025 onwards. The allegation against the
petitioner/2nd accused is that he manhandled the victim.
The 1st accused is reportedly on bail. Regard being had
period of detention undergone and the progress made in
the investigation, this Court is of the view that, grant of
bail will not cause any impediment in the process of
investigation and a fair and full probe can be well ensured 2025:KER:33608
by granting bail to the petitioner by imposing necessary
conditions. Accordingly, Bail is granted to the petitioner
on the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two
solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.
(ii) The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate
the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence
of similar nature while on bail.
Sd/-
M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE SK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!