Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 81 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
1
2025:KER:33606
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MAY 2025 / 16TH VAISAKHA, 1947
CRL.MC NO. 3749 OF 2025
CRIME NO.611/2023 OF Angamali Police Station, Ernakulam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.302 OF 2023 OF
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ANGAMALY
PETITIONERS:
1 URUMEES
AGED 59 YEARS
, S/O DEVASSY, MENACHERY HOUSE,
KAVARAPPARAMBU, ANGAMALY VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683572
2 JOMON
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O ANTHONY, MENACHERY HOUSE,
KAVARAPPARAMBU, ANGAMALY VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683572
BY ADV C.P.TENNY
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 SIMON
AGED 37 YEARS
ENCHAKKADAN HOUSE, KIDANGOOR KARA,
PAZHUPONGU BHAGAM, THURAVOOR VILLAGE,
ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683572
2
CRL.MC NO. 3749 OF 2025 2025:KER:33606
BY ADV ASHEEK ANTONY
OTHER PRESENT:
SR PP SREEJA V
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.05.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3
CRL.MC NO. 3749 OF 2025 2025:KER:33606
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J.
------------------------------------------
Crl.MC. No. 3749 OF 2025
------------------------------------------
Dated this the 06th day of May, 2025
ORDER
The Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 573/2025 of
Angamaly Police station and the offences alleged against him are
punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2) of
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha (BNS), 2023.
2. The 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant. Annexure
A4 is the affidavit sworn in by him.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Adv. Sri.
Asheek Antony the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent as
well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The averments in the Crl.M.C. and the affidavit sworn in by
respondent No.2 would show that the entire disputes between the
parties have been settled. The learned Public Prosecutor, on
instructions, submitted that a statement of the defacto complainant
has also been received wherein she has reported that the matter has
been amicably settled.
CRL.MC NO. 3749 OF 2025 2025:KER:33606
5. In view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan [(2019) 5 SCC 688],
I am of the opinion that the proceedings against the petitioner can be
quashed taking note of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
No purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings
against the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Crl. M.C. is disposed of. Annexure A3 Final
Report on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I,
Angamaly is quashed.
Sd/-
SYAM KUMAR V. M. JUDGE NJ
CRL.MC NO. 3749 OF 2025 2025:KER:33606
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 ACCUSED COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO. 611 OF 2023 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ANGAMALY DATED 23.07.2023
Annexure A2 ACCUSED COPY OF THE F.I.S IN CRIME NO. 611 OF 2023 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ANGAMALY DATED 23.07.2023
Annexure A3 ACCUSED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.
611 OF 2022 OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ANGAMALY DATED 11.09.2023
Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 14.04.2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!