Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manvi Choudhary vs Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 6018 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6018 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2025

Kerala High Court

Manvi Choudhary vs Union Of India on 20 May, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas
Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas
                                                    2025:KER:34413

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

        TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2025/30TH VAISAKHA, 1947

                    BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025

     CRIME NO.57/2025 OF AIR INTELLIGENCE UNIT, AIR CUSTOMS,

CIAL, NEDUMBASSERY, ERNAKULAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED

IN BAIL APPL. NO.5240 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

PETITIONER:

             MANVI CHOUDHARY,
             AGED 27 YEARS,
             D/O INDER SAIN CHOUDHARY, 1-D-26,
             JAWAHAR NAGAR, GANGANAGAR, RAJASTAN,
             PIN - 335 001.


             BY ADVS.
             NAVANEETH.N.NATH
             ABHIRAMI S.
             ABDUL LATHEEF P.M.



RESPONDENTS:

    1        UNION OF INDIA,
             REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KERALA,
             PIN - 682 031.

    2        INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
             AIRPORT INTELLIGENCE UNIT, CIAL COCHIN,
             REP BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             AIRPORT INTELLIGENCE UNIT, CIAL COCHIN,
             PIN - 683 111.
 BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025
                                 -2-


                                                     2025:KER:34413

     THIS   BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON

20.05.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025
                                 -3-


                                                      2025:KER:34413

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS., J
                 --------------------------------------
                  Bail Appl. No.6232 of 2025
                  ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 20th day of May, 2025

                            ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS').

2. Petitioner is the accused in O.R. No. 57/2025 of Air

Intelligence Unit, Air Customs, CIAL, Nedumbassery. She is alleged

to have committed offences punishable under sections 20(b)ii(B),

23(b), 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

3. The prosecution case is that on 19.03.2025, at around

12.45 am, the accused was found in possession of 7450 grams of

hybrid Ganja at the exit gate of Cochin International Airport and

thereby she committed the offences alleged.

4. Sri. Navaneeth N. Nath, the learned counsel for the

petitioner submitted that already a period of more than 60 days

elapsed since the petitioner was arrested on 19.03.2025 and

therefore she is entitled to be released on statutory bail. The

decision in Mohammed Sajid v. State of Kerala [2025 (2) KHC

260] has been relied upon to justify the aforesaid proposition. BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025

2025:KER:34413

5. Sri. Sreelal N. Warrior, the learned Standing Counsel

appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent submitted that the

proposition laid down in Mohammed Sajid's case requires

reconsideration. It is also submitted that the investigation is yet to

be completed and that petitioner is required to be detained further.

6. On a consideration of the rival contentions, this Court

notices that the learned Single Judge in Mohammed Sajid's case

(supra) had compared the phraseology used in Section 187(3)(i) of

BNSS as well as the phraseology used in Section 167(2)(a)(i) of

Cr.P.C and came to the conclusion that, even for offences punishable

up to 10 years, the concept of statutory bail will be available on

completion of 60 days, if the final report has not been filed. In

coming to the above conclusion, the observations of the Supreme

Court in Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam [(2017) 15 SCC

67] was relied upon apart from the decision of the Karnataka High

Court in State of Karnataka by Kavoor Police Station v.

Kalanthar Shafy [2024 KHC Online 5417].

7. Though initially this Court entertained a doubt about the

correctness of the above proposition, on a perusal of the dictum laid

down by the Supreme Court in Rakesh Kumar's case (supra), this

Court is of the considered view that the proposition in Mohammed BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025

2025:KER:34413

Sajid (supra) does not require any reconsideration. The words

'imprisonment for a term of 10 years or more' in Section 187(3)(i) of

BNSS, do indicate that there must be a minimum sentence of

imprisonment of 10 years and not a period of imprisonment upto 10

years. Since I am in consonance with the decision in Mohammed

Sajid's case (supra), the petitioner is entitled to be released on

statutory bail as sixty days have elapsed since his arrest and the

final report has not yet been filed.

8. Accordingly this bail application is allowed and the

petitioner is released on bail on the following conditions;

(a) Petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer as and when required and shall co-operate with the investigation and trial of the case.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while she is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave the Country without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

(f)Petitioner shall provide the mobile numbers and other contact numbers apart from her permanent residential address to the investigating officer. BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025

2025:KER:34413

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the

investigating officer will be at liberty to approach the jurisdictional

Court shall be empowered to consider the application for

cancellation of bail, if any, and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been

granted by this Court.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE ADS BAIL APPL. NO. 6232 OF 2025

2025:KER:34413

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 6232/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A A TRUE COPY OF THE OCCURRENCE REPORT DATED 19.03.2025 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ANGAMALY.

Annexure B A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REMAND FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT OF ANGAMALY DATED 19.03.2025.

Annexure C A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.04.2025 PRONOUNCED BY THE HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM DIVISION IN CRL.MC NO. 868 OF 2025.

Annexure D A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.04.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN BA NO.

5240 OF 2025.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter