Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T. Indira vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 7172 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7172 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

T. Indira vs State Of Kerala on 25 June, 2025

Author: D. K. Singh
Bench: D. K. Singh
WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024




                                              1
                                                                         2025:KER:45913


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH

                  WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 4TH ASHADHA, 1947

                                    WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024


PETITIONER/S:

                T. INDIRA, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O. GOPINATH, ANJALI, TRICHAMBARAM,
                TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670141


                BY ADVS. SHRI.K.N.ABHILASH; SHRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT
                SHRI.RISHI VARMA T.R.; SHRI.RITHIK S.ANAND
                SMT.SREELAKSHMI MENON P.


RESPONDENT/S:

       1        STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION
                DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695004

       2        DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, NEAR COLLECTORATE,
                KANNUR, PIN - 670012

       3        DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
                DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICE, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR, PIN - 670141

       4        THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EDUCATION
                JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

                V. VENUGOPAL-GP


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING FINALLY HEARD ON 25.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024




                                            2
                                                                     2025:KER:45913



                                         JUDGMENT

The petitioner wants payment of leave surrender benefits for

thirty days, for which the petitioner has approached this Court in the

present writ petition with the following prayers:

"(i) Call the entire records leads to Ext P4 and quash Ext P4 by issuing the writ of certiorari.

(ii) Declare that the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of leave surrender.

(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to disburse the leave surrender benefit to the petitioner.

(iv) Issue any other writ order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper while considering this writ petition."

2. The petitioner, before her promotion as Headmistress of

Moothedath High School, was teaching as a High School Assistant for

thirty long years and she was promoted as Headmistress on 31.03.2021.

Thereafter, she demitted office on 31.05.2021. WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024

2025:KER:45913

3. The petitioner's claim for thirty days earned leave surrender

benefit has been rejected vide Ext.P2 order dated 09.12.2022, which was

confirmed by the appellate order in Ext.P4 dated 11.06.2024. These

orders are challenged before this Court.

4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner's claim has been rejected on the grounds of Rule 81A of Part I

of Kerala Service Rules. However, the said Rule is not applicable in the

case of the petitioner, and what is applicable is Note 4 of Rule 81 of the

Kerala Service Rules. It is further submitted that the petitioner should

be treated as 'transferred' from a vacation department to a non-vacation

department after she was promoted.

5. On the other hand, Mr V Venugopal learned Government

Pleader has submitted that the petitioner cannot claim the benefit of

Note 4 of Rule 81, which is applicable in respect of an officer who is

transferred from a vacation department to a non-vacation department.

Promotion in the same department is not a 'transfer'. The duties of the WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024

2025:KER:45913

petitioner as Principal may be to work even during vacation. But that

does not mean that the petitioner was transferred from a vacation

department to a non-vacation department.

5.1 Further, it is submitted that the Government has issued

Government Order dated 05.02.1973, whereby the headmasters of

schools under the Director of Public Instruction are to be treated as non-

vacation officers with effect from 09.06.1969. Therefore, the petitioner

could be treated as a non-vacation officer.

6. Note 4 to Rule 81 of the Kerala Service Rules reads as under:

"Note 4. When an officer is transferred from a vacation department to a non-vacation department, his period of service in the former will, for the purpose of calculation of leave, be considered to have terminated with effect from the close of the last vacation enjoyed by him. But if the transfer is effected during the course of vacation, he will be deemed to have been transferred to the non-vacation department on the close of the vacation which he has partly enjoyed and he will be credited with proportionate amount of earned leave under this rule for the period of vacation which he was prevented from enjoying on account of such transfer. When an officer is transferred from a non-vacation to a vacation WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024

2025:KER:45913

department, his period of service in the latter will be held to have commenced from the date of expiry of the last vacation previous to such transfer."

6.1 Rule 81A of Part 1 of the Kerala Service Rules reads as under:

"81A-The earned leave admissible to an officer in permanent employ in the Vacation Department, who is prevented from availing himself of vacation in full and whose actual period of duty is less than one year due to superannuation, shall be calculated in such proportion for full block year as the number of days of actual duty bears to the full year........"

7. The petitioner's reliance on Note 4 of Rule 81 is misplaced

since the petitioner is not transferred from a vacation department to a

non-vacation department, but she was promoted in the same

department. Because of the Government Order dated 05.02.1973, her

period of promotion of two months would be treated as a non-vacation

period.

7.1 Thus, this Court does not find that the stand taken in the

impugned orders in Exts.P2 and P4 suffers from any illegality or that the

petitioner can claim the benefit of leave surrender as claimed in this writ WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024

2025:KER:45913

petition.

Therefore, the writ petition fails, which is hereby dismissed.

Sd/-

D. K. SINGH JUDGE

jjj WP(C) NO. 40303 OF 2024

2025:KER:45913

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40303/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.06.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER 1/193898/2022 DATED 09.12.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.05.2023 IN WP(C) 15133 OF 2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.06.2024 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter