Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sudheesh vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 368 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 368 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Sudheesh vs State Of Kerala on 5 June, 2025

                                                                        1




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
   THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1947
                         CRL.MC NO. 2933 OF 2025
 CRIME NO.1050/2015 OF Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam
           AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN APPEAL NO NO.71 OF
2023       OF   ADDITIONAL   DISTRICT   &   SESSIONS   COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA
ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 30.01.2023 IN CC NO.532
OF 2016 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PIRAVOM
PETITIONER/S:

       1        SUDHEESH​
                AGED 44 YEARS​
                S/O. SUKUMARAN, PONGUMKALAYIL HOUSE, THOTTARA KARA,
                KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
                682315

       2        GOMATHY​
                AGED 74 YEARS​
                W/O. SUKUMARAN, PONGUMAKALAYIL HOUSE, THOTTARA KARA,
                KULIYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
                682315

       3        SUKUMARAN​
                AGED 79 YEARS​
                S/O. KANNAN, PONGUMKALAYIL HOUSE, THOTTARA KARA,
                KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
                682315

       4        REMYA​
                AGED 38 YEARS​
                W/O. SUDHEESH, PONGUMKALAYIL HOUSE, THOTTARA KARA,
                KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
                682315


                BY ADVS. ​
                SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM​
                SHRI.THOMAS C.ABRAHAM​
                SHRI.BASIL MATHEW​
                                                 2025:KER:39818
Crl.M.C 2933/2025             2


RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA​
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2     JOBY JOHN​
          AGED 45 YEARS​
          S/O. LATE JOHN, GRACE VILLA, THOTTARA KARA,
          KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
          682315

    3     ALIAMMA JOHN​
          AGED 75 YEARS​
          W/O. LATE JOHN, GRACE VILLA, THOTTARA KARA,
          KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
          682315

    4     SUJA​
          AGED 40 YEARS​
          W/O. JOBY JOHN, GRACE VILLA, THOTTARA KARA,
          KULAYITTIKKARA VILLAGE. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
          682315


          BY ADV SRI.P.P.RAJESH

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                              2025:KER:39818
Crl.M.C 2933/2025                      3



                                   ORDER

​ The petitioners are the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.71/2023 on the

files of Additional District and Sessions Court, Muvattupuzha. They were

convicted by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Piravom, as per

judgement dated 30.01.2023 in CC No.532/2016 for the commission of

offences under Sections 283, 323, 324, 452, 294(b), 506(ii) and 427 IPC read

with Section 34 IPC. The offences were in respect of the alleged criminal

trespass, physical assault and mischief committed upon PW1 to PW3.

​ 2.​ In the present petition, the petitioners seek to quash the

conviction and sentence awarded by the learned Magistrate, stating the reason

that the issue has been amicably settled with the aggrieved persons. It is

further stated that a counter case registered in connection with the same

incident is also settled pursuant to the compromise between the parties.

​ 3.​ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel

for the de facto complainant and the learned public prosecutor, representing

the State of Kerala.

​ 4.​ The learned counsel for the de facto complainant submitted that

all issues between the parties, which resulted in Crime No.1053/2015, which is

the subject matter of SC No.701/2019 and Crime No.1050/2015 of 2025:KER:39818

Mulanthuruthy Police Station, which is the subject matter of Criminal Appeal

71/2023, have been amicably settled between the parties, and hence there is

absolutely no need to continue the proceedings in those cases. The aggrieved

persons have filed affidavits to the effect that they are not having any

subsisting grievance, and that it is highly necessary to quash the conviction

and sentence awarded by the trial court since the matter has been amicably

settled with the petitioners.

​ 5.​ The learned public prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted that

the aggrieved persons have given statements to the investigating officer also

upon same terms as that of the affidavits filed before this court.

​ 6.​ In Crl.MC 4358/2025, which relates to the counter case registered

in connection with the alleged assault perpetrated upon the petitioners herein,

affidavit has been filed by the second petitioner herein to the effect that the

issue has been amicably settled, and hence the proceedings in SC

No.701/2019 on the files of the Special Court for SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989,

Ernakulam, are to be quashed. On the basis of the aforesaid affidavit, and also

upon consideration of the submissions of the parties, the said case pending

before the Special Court has been quashed by a separate order of this Court.

As the issues between the parties have been amicably settled, and they are

not having any subsisting grievance, there is absolutely no need to enforce the 2025:KER:39818

conviction and sentence awarded against the petitioners by the learned

Magistrate in CC No.532/2016. As rightly pointed out by the petitioners, there

is no legal embargo in quashing the proceedings, even after conviction by the

Trial Court when the matter is pending at the appellate or revisional stage.

The legal position in this regard has been laid down by this Court in Soban v.

State of Kerala [2021(3)KHC 383].

​ 7.​ Having regard to the fact that the issues involved are purely

private in nature, and that the parties have amicably settled the disputes

between them, I am of the view that the quashment of the conviction and

sentence awarded by the Trial Court is highly necessary to meet the ends of

justice.

​ In the result, the petition stands allowed. The conviction and sentence

awarded by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Piravom, upon the

petitioners herein, as per judgment dated 30.01.2023 in CC No.532/2016, are

hereby quashed. The Appellate Court shall take note of this order and close

the appeal against the aforesaid judgment of the learned Magistrate.

Sd/-

G.GIRISH JUDGE IAP 2025:KER:39818

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.

1050/2015 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION DATED 24/01/2016 Annexure 2 THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12/03/2025 SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Annexure 3 THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12/03/2025 SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Annexure 4 THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12/03/2025 SWORN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Annexure 5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30/1/2023 IN C.C. NO. 532/2016 ON THE FILES OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PIRAVOM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter