Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Hussian Alias Hussian Ashari vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 248 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 248 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Mohammed Hussian Alias Hussian Ashari vs State Of Kerala on 2 June, 2025

Author: N.Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
                                            2025:KER:38428




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

 MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                WP(C) NO. 17552 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

         MOHAMMED HUSSIAN ALIAS HUSSIAN ASHARI
         AGED 54 YEARS
         S/O. LATE MUHAMMED, KOKKOTTIL HOUSE,
         AMBALAPADI, KOLATHUR P.O.,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679338

         BY ADVS.
         SHRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE
         SMT.M.SANTHY
         SHRI.SANIL KUMAR S.
         SMT.ANNA JEZITA DAVID




RESPONDENTS:

    1    STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
         HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
         SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 69500

    2    DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
         KERALA POLICE HEADQUARTERS,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010

    3    SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
         UPHILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676505
                                              2025:KER:38428
WP(C) No.17552 of 2025
                           2


    4    DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
         PERUNTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
         PIN - 676505

    5    STATION HOUSE OFFICER
         KOLATHUR POLICE STATION,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679338

    6    MR. RAINKUTTY
         AGED 65 YEARS
         S/O KUNJALAVI HAJI, SECRETARY,
         MASJID COMMITTEE, JALALIA JUMA MUSJID,
         KOLATHUR, PERUNTHALMANNA,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679338

    7    MAKANDAN SHARAFU, AGED 45 YEARS
         S/O MARAKKAR, MAKANDAN HOUSE, KOLATHUR P.O.,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679338

    8    KHASIM
         S/O. HAVVA UMMA, PUTHUVAKKOOTHU VEEDU,
         KOLATHUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
         PIN - 679338

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.V.JOHN SEBASTIAN RALPH
         SRI.VISHNU CHANDRAN
         SRI. RALPH RETI JOHN
         SRI.GIRIDHAR KRISHNA KUMAR
         SRI.ABDUL RASHEED
         SMT.GEETHU T.A.
         SMT.MARY GREESHMA
         SMT.LIZ JOHNY
         SMT.KRISHNAPRIYA SREEKUMAR
         SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 02.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                     2025:KER:38428
WP(C) No.17552 of 2025
                                  3



                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2025

The petitioner, a permanent resident of Malappuram

District, has filed this writ petition seeking police protection for

him and his family. The threat allegedly arises from a group of

individuals affiliated with the Jalalia Juma Masjid, Kolathur,

including its Secretary and his close associates, who have

allegedly assaulted and threatened the petitioner and his wife

due to the petitioner's whistleblowing activity.

2. The petitioner submitted Ext.P1

representation to the Chief Secretary of Kerala on 10.12.2024,

exposing the illegal encroachment of 2.29 Acres of

Government land by the governing body of the religious

institution. Based on this, the District Collector and Tahsildar

initiated steps to verify the complaint including a scheduled

land survey. In retaliation, the petitioner and his wife were 2025:KER:38428

subjected to violent attacks on 28.03.2025 and again on

12.04.2025, resulting in grievous injury.

3. Despite repeated complaints lodged with the

police and clear instructions from the District Collector to

provide protection, the police authorities failed to take any

action. This continued inaction has not only emboldened the

aggressors, but also placed the petitioner and his family in

grave and ongoing danger. The petitioner seeks to direct the

concerned police authorities to provide adequate protection to

him and his family.

4. Respondents 6 to 8 entered appearance and

resisted the writ petition. Respondents 6 to 8 submitted that

the allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition are

false and incorrect. Respondents 6 to 8 denied the allegation

of unlawful trespassing. Visit of respondents 7 and 8 to the

petitioner's house was aimed at counselling him to avoid

stirring up issues within the community and to protect the 2025:KER:38428

sanctity of the religious faith.

5. The petitioner frequently misused the Right

To Information Act to harass ordinary citizens and engage in

illegal bribery under the pretext of legal activism. He engages

his wife to make false allegations as complaints to the public

officials.

6. The petitioner's claims are completely

unfounded, spurious and maliciously motivated, constituting a

deliberate attempt to defame and tarnish reputation of the

respondents. These fabricated accusations are intended

solely to harass and intimidate the respondents, rather than

serve any legitimate purpose, contended respondents 6 to 8.

7. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the learned Government Pleader representing

respondents 1 to 5 and the learned counsel appearing for

respondents 6 to 8.

2025:KER:38428

8. From the pleadings, it is discernible that the

petitioner has made certain complaints alleging encroachment

of puramboke land by Jalalia Juma Masjid, Kolathur,

Perinthalmanna. According to the petitioner, annoyed by the

complaint made by the petitioner, the persons affiliated to the

said Juma Masjid, are obstructing and physically threatening

the petitioner.

9. When this matter came up for admission on

06.05.2025, this Court passed an interim order directing

respondents 4 and 5 to provide adequate police protection for

the lives of the petitioner and his family.

10. Going through the pleadings, I find that the

petitioner is facing threat from the members of Juma Masjid.

In the circumstances, the writ petition can be disposed of with

appropriate directions.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing

the 5th respondent that if the petitioner brings to the notice of 2025:KER:38428

the 5th respondent any threat from the part of respondents 6 to

8 or anyone claiming under them, the 5th respondent shall look

into the matter and extend sufficient police protection to the

petitioner as is found necessary.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk 2025:KER:38428

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17552/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.12.2024 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20/12/2024 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT COMMUNICATION Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 29.03.2025 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 3/4/2025 Exhibit P5(a) THE RECEIPT DATED 03/04/2025 ISSUED FROM DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, MALAPPURAM Exhibit P6 A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03/04/25 Exhibit P6(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DATED 03.04.2025 Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE EMERGENCY OUTPATIENT CARD DATED 13/04/25 ISSUED FROM GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE KOZHIKODE Exhibit P7(a) A COPY OF THE TRIAGE SHEET ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 18.04.2025 (SUBMITTED ON 19/04/25)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter