Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr Bijimol vs Bhaskaran K
2025 Latest Caselaw 2502 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2502 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2025

Kerala High Court

Dr Bijimol vs Bhaskaran K on 16 January, 2025

                                                2025:KER:3783

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ

 THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 26TH POUSHA, 1946

                    OP(C) NO. 104 OF 2025

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED     IN OS NO.15 OF 2023 OF
ASSISTANT   SESSIONS  COURT/SUB      COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT,
MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONERS:
    1     DR BIJIMOL
          AGED 43 YEARS
          D/O DAMODARAN, AGED 43 YEARS, KANJIPURATH,
          PUTHIYAVILA (P.O.), VELANCHIRA, KARTHIKAPPALLY
          TALUK, KANDALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA-, PIN - 690531

    2     DR LIJI S
          AGED 40 YEARS
          D/O DAMODARAN, AGED 40 YEARS, KANJIPURATH,
          PUTHIYAVILA (P.O.), VELANCHIRA, KARTHIKAPPALLY
          TALUK, KANDALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690531

    3     SOFIYA
          AGED 10 YEARS
          REPRESENTE BY THE MOTHER D/O DR BIJIMOL,
          KANJIPURATH, PUTHIYAVILA (P.O.), VELANCHIRA,
          KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, KANDALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA,
          PIN - 690531

    4     DEVADARSANA PANICKER,
          AGED 8 YEARS
          REPRESENTE BY THE MOTHER D/O DR LIJI S,
          KANJIPURATH, PUTHIYAVILA (P.O.), VELANCHIRA,
          KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, KANDALLUR VILLAGE,
          ALAPPUZHA-, PIN - 690531
    5     GAURI PANICKER
          AGED 7 YEARS
          (MINOR), AGED 7 YEARS,REPRESENTE BY THE MOTHER D/O
          DR LIJI S, AGED 40 YEARS, KANJIPURATH, PUTHIYAVILA
          (P.O.), VELANCHIRA, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, KANDALLUR
          VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA-, PIN - 690531
 OP(C) No.104 of 2025
                             2
                                               2025:KER:3783


    6     RAGHUL D PANICKER
          AGED 44 YEARS
          S/O DIVAKARA PANICKER, KANJIPURATH, PUTHIYAVILA
          (P.O.), VELANCHIRA, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK,
          KANDALLUR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA-, PIN - 690531

    7     VIJAYARAJ
          AGED 62 YEARS
          S/O PADMANABHAN, MEENATHIL HOUSE, PERUMPALLY,
          VALIYAZHIKKAL (P.O.), ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690535


          BY ADVS.
          C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM)
          D.JAYAKRISHNAN
          VIJAYKRISHNAN S. MENON
          VIVEK NAIR P.
          K.S.ARAVIND
          ANANTHU R MURALI
          V.ASWIN
          ADEEBA AMEEN
          SRUTHI SREEKUMAR
          M.R.RADHAKRISHNAN




RESPONDENT:

          BHASKARAN K
          AGED 70 YEARS
          S/O KUCHUMMINI, SNEHALAYAM, PUTHIYAVILA (P.O.),
          KANDALLOOR, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690531



     THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 OP(C) No.104 of 2025
                                   3
                                                         2025:KER:3783



                              P.M. MANOJ, J
                    -----------------------------------
                      O.P.(C) No.104 of 2025
              ----------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 16th day of January, 2025


                                JUDGMENT

The original petition is preferred being aggrieved by the

delay in disposing I.A. No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.15 of 2023 on the

files of Sub Court, Mavelikkara.

2. The suit was preferred by the respondent for

declaring the settlement deed dated 04.04.2017 which

registered as a document No.447 of 2017 of SRO, Keerikad as

null and void and to set aside the same and declare document

Nos.491 of 2021 and 492 of 2021 of SRO, Keerikad not binding

on the plaintiff as those documents were executed by the

defendants 1,7 and 8 by playing fraud on the plaintiff and also

for a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the

defendants or anybody under them from trespassing into the

plaint 'A' schedule property, demolishing the structure and other

constructions on it and from committing any kind of mischief in

it.

3. It is stated that the father of the 1 st and 2nd petitioners

herein derived title in respect of A schedule property through

2025:KER:3783

settlement deed No.446/17 dated 04.04.2017 executed on the

files of SRO, Keerikkad. The above referred property was

unconditionally settled in favour of the 1st defendant who is the

father of the petitioners 1 & 2 without any reservation as to life

estate or any contingent interest. Father of petitioners 1 and 2,

and the 1st defendant in the suit had accepted the settlement

deed on the date of its execution itself. Thereafter, on

29.03.2021 the 1st defendant Damodaran settled the above

property in favour of his daughters and grand children who are

the petitioners herein.

4. The Sub Court, Mavelikkara on 22.02.2023 issued an

ex-parte ad-interim injunction order in IA No. 1 of 2023

restraining the defendants/petitioners herein from destructing

the boundary demarcations of the 'A' schedule property, annex

any portion of it with defendant's property and committing any

act of mischief in it.

5. During the pendency of the suit, 1st defendant

Damodaran had expired. Even after obtaining the ad-interim

injunction order, on 02.03.2023, the respondent along with his

son in law and other henchmen trespassed into the registered

land of the petitioners 1 to 5 and the property owned by

the mother of petitioners 1 and 2/1 st defendant's wife with the

2025:KER:3783

aid of JCB and made two pits on the northern side and about 15

loads of earth were removed from the said land and dumped in

the northern plot. Being aggrieved by that, the petitioners filed a

detailed objection to I.A No. 1 of 2023 praying to dismiss the

same.

6. The petitioners had specifically pointed out in Ext.P3

objection to I.A. No.1 of 2023; the illegality committed by the

respondent/plaintiff. While instituting the suit on 20.02.2023, the

respondent/plaintiff preferred I.A No. 1 of 2023 for temporary

injunction in respect to the 'A' schedule property which claims to

be absolutely belongs to the petitioners 1 to 5 by virtue of

settlement deed executed by settlement deeds No. 491 of 2021

and 492 of 2021 on the files of SRO, Keerikad. The

respondent/plaintiff preferred the above suit challenging the

settlement deed dated 04.04.2017, which was executed by him

in the name of the deceased 1st defendant. The deed came into

operation and the 1st defendant had derived title and

possession in respect of schedule No. 'A' in the suit and

thereafter settled in favour of the petitioners herein.

7. It is further stated that, the respondent/plaintiff

obtained the ex-parte ad-interim injunction suppressing the

material facts. The case was posted on 23.09.2023, for hearing

2025:KER:3783

I.A. and the case was adjourned for the reason that the Presiding

Officer was on leave. Under such circumstances, the petitioners

have preferred O.P.(C). No. 2130 of 2023 seeking for an

expeditious disposal of I.A within a time frame which is to be

fixed by this Court. By order dated 10.10.2023 the O.P. was

closed stating that there was no hindrance for the petitioners to

move for an early hearing of I.A. in the trial court itself.

Thereafter the matter stands posted on 22 occasions and finally

posted to 16.01.2025. Even today that matter has got adjourned

to some other day. This is the circumstance in which the

petitioners have preferred this original petition for an

expeditious disposal of I.A. No.1 of 2023 and for an expeditious

consideration of Ext.P3 objection.

8. I have heard Sri.C.Unnikrishnan, the learned counsel

for the petitioners. On considering the limited nature of prayer

sought in the writ petition, I prefer to dispense notice to the

respondent. Accordingly, notice to the respondent is dispensed

with.

9. On considering the facts involved in this case, i.e.,

even after 22 postings between 04.11.2023 to 17.12.2024, the

I.A. was not disposed. While the matter was considered today,

the counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, that is also

2025:KER:3783

adjourned. It is stated that the counsel for the petitioner was

ready and pressed for hearing on all the postings above

mentioned. On considering these circumstances, it appears that

it will be appropriate to grant directions as sought in the original

petition. Accordingly, the Sub Court, Mavelikkara is directed to

consider Ext.P2 i.e., I.A. No.1 of 2023 and the objection preferred

against I.A. No.1 of 2023 as per Ext.P3 in the next posting itself

and pass appropriate orders.

Accordingly, the original petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

P.M.MANOJ JUDGE sss

2025:KER:3783

APPENDIX OF OP(C) 104/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO.

15 OF 2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 1/2023 IN O.S. NO. 15 OF 2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA

Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED ON 10.07.2023 BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN/DEFENDANTS IN I.A. NO. 1/2023 IN O.S. NO. 15 OF 2023 OF THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.(C) NO. 2130 OF 2023 DATED 10.10.2023

Exhibit P5 . TRUE COPY OF THE B-DIARY OF THE CASE PROCEEDINGS OF THE O.S. NO. 15 OF 2023 UPTO 19.08.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter