Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Jameela vs The State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 1931 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1931 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2025

Kerala High Court

P. Jameela vs The State Of Kerala on 6 January, 2025

Author: Murali Purushothaman
Bench: Murali Purushothaman
Wpc40494 of 2023              ..1..




                                                 2025:KER:96


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

 MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 16TH POUSHA, 1946

                    WP(C) NO. 40494 OF 2023

PETITIONERS:

     1      P. JAMEELA, AGED 69 YEARS
            MEMBER(RTD), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
            D/O N SREEDHARAN, AGED 69 YEARS
            M-10-16 VALIYATHARAYIL INDIRANAGAR,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695005

     2      DR. GRESAMMA MATHEW, AGED 69 YEARS
            MEMBER(RTD), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
            D/O MATHEW KANIKATHOTTU(H), VAKASSERIL LANE
            ERAYILKADAVU, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686001

     3      DR. K USHA, AGED 68 YEARS
            MEMBER(RTD), KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
            D/O KAMBISSERI KARUNAKARAN KAMBISSERIL,
            PRATHEEKSHA NAGAR KOLLAM, PIN - 691004


            BY ADVS.
            S.PRASANTH (AYYAPPANKAVU)
            VARSHA BHASKAR
            ANUPAMA SIBI
            N.KRISHNA OZHAKKANAT
            MALAVIKA K.
 Wpc40494 of 2023                   ..2..




                                                        2025:KER:96



RESPONDENTS:

     1          THE STATE OF KERALA
                REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION(E),
                SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     2          KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
                REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PATTOM PO.,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004

     3          THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A&E) KERALA
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695039



         THIS    WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLYL
HEARD ON 22.11.2024, THE COURT ON             06.01.2025 DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
 Wpc40494 of 2023             ..3..




                                            2025:KER:96




                        JUDGMENT

The petitioners are retired members of the

Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC). The 1 st

petitioner, who retired on 31.03.2010 as Joint

Director of Forensic Science Laboratory under the

Home Department, was appointed as Member of the

PSC as per Ext.P1 Government Order. Vide Ext.P1,

the 2nd petitioner who retired on 31.03.2010 as a

Teacher from BCM College, Kottayam was also

appointed as Member of the PSC. The 3rd petitioner

retired from Sasthamkotta Devaswom Board

College as Associate Professor on 31.03.2010 and

was appointed as the Member of the PSC as per Wpc40494 of 2023 ..4..

2025:KER:96

Ext.P2 Government Order.

2. The Kerala Public Service Commission

(Composition and Conditions of Service of Members

and Staff) Regulations, 1957 (hereinafter referred

to as 'the Regulations') are framed under Article

318 of the Constitution of India. Regulations 7 and

7A relate to the reckoning of pension for the

Chairman and Members of the PSC. As per the

Regulations, the Chairman or other Member of the

PSC, who, on the date of his entering on duties as

such, was in the service of the Government of

Kerala, shall count his service as Chairman/Member

for pension under the Rules applicable to the

service to which he belonged immediately before Wpc40494 of 2023 ..5..

2025:KER:96

such appointment. However, at his option, to be

exercised within a period of six months, he would

be entitled to draw his pension and other

retirement benefits under the Rules applicable to

service to which he belonged. As per Clause (3) of

Regulation 7A, the Chairman or other Member of

the Commission, who on the date of his entering on

duties as such was in the service of the Government

of India or the Government of any State other than

the State of Kerala shall from the date of his

appointment be entitled to draw his pension and

other retirement benefits under the Rules

applicable to the service to which he belonged, with

effect from the date of his appointment as Chairman

or other Member. Clause (4) also enables such a Wpc40494 of 2023 ..6..

2025:KER:96

Chairman or other Member to exercise option

within a period of three months not to draw the

pension and be entitled to count his service for

pension and his pension shall be revised as per the

Rules applicable to the service to which he

belonged immediately before such appointment.

However, the salary shall be reduced by the amount

equivalent to the pension and he shall be entitled to

draw his pension and retirement benefits

separately. Clause (4) of Rule 7A enables the

Chairman or Members to exercise the option, within

a period of three months, not to draw the pension

and to count the service towards pension under the

Rules of his erstwhile appointment.

 Wpc40494 of 2023                ..7..




                                                          2025:KER:96



3. The Government have amended the

Regulations as per Ext.P7 Order dated 21.08.2017.

As per Clause 7(1) of the amended Regulations, the

Chairman/Member of the PSC shall be given

pension at the rate of 7.5% of the basic pay drawn

for every completed year of service as

Chairman/Member in the Commission subject to a

maximum of 50% of basic pay drawn and Dearness

Allowance at the rate admissible to Central

Government Employees (pre-revised).

4. The petitioners, along with one

K.Premarajan and another person, had earlier

approached this Court by filing WP(C)

No.4203/2015 and this Court, taking note of the Wpc40494 of 2023 ..8..

2025:KER:96

amended Regulations as well as Ext.P9 judgment

rendered in identical case, directed consideration

of the request of the petitioners for payment of

revised pension vide Ext.P8 judgment. The

Government was also directed to consider whether

a fresh opportunity should be given to the

petitioners to opt in the light of the subsequent

amendment of the Regulations with retrospective

effect from the dates prior to the appointment of

the petitioners.

5. Pursuant to Ext.P8 judgment, the

Government passed Ext.P10 order rejecting the

request of the petitioners relying on the unamended

provisions of Regulation 7A(1) and (2) of the Wpc40494 of 2023 ..9..

2025:KER:96

Regulations. It is stated therein that since there is

no provision for exercising a re-option and since the

petitioners had already exercised their option, such

request also cannot be considered.

6. One of the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.4203 of

2015 viz., Sri.K.Premarajan, filed W.P.(C) No.28946

of 2020 challenging Ext.P10 order. This Court, by

Ext.P15 judgment, set aside Ext.P10 order and

directed the Government to re-consider the case of

the petitioner for grant of re-option and for drawal

of pension in accordance with the amended

Regulations as has been done in the case of

identically situated persons after following

necessary procedure. This Court, in Ext.P15, Wpc40494 of 2023 ..10..

2025:KER:96

observed as follows:

"In the result, Ext.P10 order is set aside. There will be a direction to the Government to re-consider the case of the petitioner for grant of the re-option and for drawl of pension in accordance with the amended Regulations as has been done in the case of identically situated persons as evident from Exts.P13 and P20 orders, after following necessary procedure as has been done in those cases. The 1st respondent shall take appropriate steps to pass orders in accordance with law, in the case of the petitioner as well and after following all due procedure, taking note of the orders passed in the case of identical situated persons. Appropriate action shall be taken within a period of three months from Wpc40494 of 2023 ..11..

2025:KER:96

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment."

7. Pursuant to Ext.P15 judgment, the

Government have issued Ext.P16 order, allowing

Sri.K.Premarajan to revise his pension option. The

petitioners state that they are similarly situated like

Sri.K.Premarajan and the benefit granted to him

shall be extended to them also.

8. Heard Sri.Prasanth Sugathan, the learned

counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Antony Mukkath, the

learned Senior Government Pleader and

Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned Standing Counsel

for the 2nd respondent.

9. By Ext.P15 judgment, this Court observed

that when benefits were conferred to identically Wpc40494 of 2023 ..12..

2025:KER:96

situated persons, there can be no reason to

eliminate other similarly situated persons without

any justification. It was in the said circumstances

that this Court set aside Ext.P10 and directed the

Government to re-consider the case of the

petitioner in W.P.(C)No.28946 of 2020 for grant of

re-option and for drawal of pension in accordance

with the amended Regulations. Pursuant to

Ext.P15, the Government considered the case of the

petitioner therein and granted him the benefit as

per Ext.P16 order after exempting from the

provision of Regulation 7A(2) of the Regulations. It

is stated in Ext.P16 that the decision taken by the

Government therein shall not be treated as a

precedent. If the benefit of re-option of pension can Wpc40494 of 2023 ..13..

2025:KER:96

be granted to Sri.K.Premarajan, there is no rhyme

or reason for not extending the same to the

petitioners who are similarly situated and who had

approached this Court in W.P.(C) No.4203 of 2015

along with Sri.K.Premarajan seeking for the very

same benefit. While exercising the powers of

exemption from the provisions of Regulation 7A(2),

similarly situated persons cannot be eliminated

without any justification. The discretion of the

Government to grant exemption cannot be

exercised in arbitrary manner. The same would

amount to violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the

Constitution of India.

Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. There Wpc40494 of 2023 ..14..

2025:KER:96

will be a direction to the 1st respondent to re-

consider the case of the petitioners for grant of re-

option and for drawal of pension in accordance with

the amended Regulations as has been done in

Ext.P16 order in the case of Sri.K.Premarajan.

Appropriate orders in this regard shall be passed

within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

                     MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
                             JUDGE
SB
 Wpc40494 of 2023                ..15..




                                                   2025:KER:96




                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1         TRUE COPY OF G.O.(P) NO. 316/2010/GAD

DATED 14/09/2010 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF DATED G.O.(P) NO. 27/2011/GAD DATED 25/01/2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATIONS 1957 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE CCOPY OF THE RESOLUTION DATED 08.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER TO CHIEF MINISTER

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF GO(MS) NO. 25/2013 DATED 31- 01-2013 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION (F)

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF G.O(P) NO. 23/2017/GAD DATED 21-08-2017 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (SPECIAL -E) DEPARTMENT

Exhibit P8 TRUECOPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BE COURT DATED 16-11-2019 IN WP(C) NO.



Exhibit P9         TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE
                   COURT    DATED   22-05-2019   IN    WP(C)

 Wpc40494 of 2023               ..16..




                                                  2025:KER:96




Exhibit P10        TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO. 76/2020/GAD DATED

04-01-2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.SPL.E1/86/2019/GAD DATED 22-08-2019 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF GO(MS) NO.102/2019/GAD DATED 27-05-2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO. 6354/2009/GAD DATED 07-09-2009 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF GO(MS)NO.103/2019/GAD DATED 28-05-2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 06-10-2022 IN WP(C) NO.

Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF G.O. (MS) NO. 163/2023/GAD DATED 13-10-2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS)NO.88/2021/GAD DATED 12-02-2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter