Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rainy John vs Prince Mathew
2025 Latest Caselaw 3378 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3378 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Rainy John vs Prince Mathew on 12 August, 2025

Author: Devan Ramachandran
Bench: Devan Ramachandran
                                              2025:KER:60924



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
                                &
         THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA
  TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 21ST SRAVANA, 1947
                   OP (FC) NO. 442 OF 2025
  AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.3/2025 IN OP NO.503 OF 2025 OF
                    FAMILY COURT, KANNUR

PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:

          RAINY JOHN, AGED 47 YEARS, D/O P.J. JOHN,
          KADAVANKUNNEL HOUSE, PALLIKKULAM, CHIRAKKAL
          P.O, CHIRAKKAL VILLAGE, KANNUR TALUK,
          KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670011

          BY ADVS.
          SMT.ARCHANA MITHRAN O.K.
          SMT.K.K.SHEEBA
          SMT.LIMNA BHASKARAN


RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3:

    1     PRINCE MATHEW, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O MATHEW,
          KADAVANKUNNEL HOUUSE, PALLIKKULAM, CHIRAKKAL
          P.O, CHIRAKKAL VILLAGE, KANUR TALUK, KANNUR
          DISTRICT, PIN - 670001

    2     FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH
          MANAGER, VALAPATTANAM BRANCH, 3/586-B, GROUND
          FLOOR, RAJEESH RESIDENCY, NATIONAL HIGHWAY,
          CHIRAKKAL, PUTHIYATHERU, KANNUR, PIN - 670001

    3     AXIS BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH
          MANAGER, SOUTH BAZAAR BRANCH, B/15, AKASH
          BUILDING, GROUND FLOOR, KADABERI, SOUTH BAZAAR,
          KANNUR, PIN - 670002
                                                       2025:KER:60924
OP(FC) 442/25
                                   2

            BY ADVS.
            SRI.MANSOOR ALI
            SHRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR


      THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.08.2025,     THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                                     2025:KER:60924
OP(FC) 442/25
                                           3

                                  JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 order of the learned Family

Court, Kannur, however, only qua the directions dated

08.05.2025.

2. Smt.Archana Mithran - learned counsel for the

petitioner, submitted that her client has already complied with the

directions in the order impugned, but did not surrender her

Passport because she has to travel to Australia for employment.

She added that the learned Family Court, thereupon, issued

further orders initiating action for disobedience against her client.

She argued that the direction in the impugned order, that her

client shall surrender the Passport, is totally untenable,

particularly when it says that it has been ordered to ensure that

she does not make any further drawings on the Fixed Deposit,

which is the subject matter of the Original Petition filed by the 1st

respondent - her husband. She offered an undertaking that her 2025:KER:60924 OP(FC) 442/25

client, even if she is to travel abroad, will not deal with the

Fixed Deposit any further and that she is willing to maintain

complete status quo with respect to the same until further orders

are issued by the learned Family Court.

3. In response, Sri.P.Santhosh Kumar - learned counsel

for the 1st respondent, submitted that his client never wanted the

Passport of the petitioner to be surrendered, but only that she

furnish security for the amounts she has already withdrawn from

the Fixed Deposit. He explained that his client has a genuine

apprehension that, if the petitioner is allowed to travel abroad

without furnishing security of the amounts in question, she would

never return and his client will be consequently left without any

remedy, even if he is to obtain a decree.

4. When we examine Ext.P5 to the extent impugned, it is

evident that the learned Family Court has already made it clear

that the petitioner shall not draw any further amounts from the

Fixed Deposit. The action/orders that the learned Family Court 2025:KER:60924 OP(FC) 442/25

will pass with respect to the amount allegedly withdrawn earlier

are wholly for it to decide in due course; but we fail to

understand why it then directed the petitioner to surrender her

Passport. This can only construe that the learned Court intended

that the petitioner shall not leave India until the Original Petition

is disposed of, but we cannot find any power vested in it to have

done so.

5. Since Sri.Santhosh Kumar also says that his client never

sought for surrender of Passport of the petitioner, we cannot find

favour with Ext.P5 to that extent.

6 Coming to the argument of Sri.Santhosh Kumar that the

petitioner must be asked to furnish security for the amounts she

has allegedly drawn from the Fixed Deposit, this is a matter his

client should raise before the learned Family Court appropriately

and it would not be upon us to make any orders to such effect.

In the afore circumstances, we allow this Original

Petition and set aside Ext.P5 order dated 08.05.2025, to the extent 2025:KER:60924 OP(FC) 442/25

to which the petitioner has been directed to surrender her

Passport before the learned Family Court. However, we record the

submissions of Smt.Archana Mithran that her client will not deal

any further with the Fixed Deposits until further orders

authorising such are issued by the learned Family Court.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE RR 2025:KER:60924 OP(FC) 442/25

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 442/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION AS O.P.NO.503/2025 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24/3/2025 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT KANNUR, DATED 08-04-2025 IN IA.NO.2/2025 IN OP

Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN I.A.NO.3/2025 IN I.A.NO.2/2025 IN OP NO. 503/2025 OF FAMILY COURT KANNUR DATED 15/4/2025 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT KANNUR IN OP

Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, KANNUR IN I.A.NO.3/2025 IN OP NO. 503/2025 DATED 8/5/2025 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1(a). The copy of the HDFC bank statement for the period from 28.06.2019 to 04.11.2024 of the 1st respondent herein dated nill Exhibit R1(b) The copy of the ICICI bank statement of the 1st respondent herein dated 03.12.2024 Exhibit -R1(c). The True copy of the order in I.A. No. 3 of 2025 dated 18/6/2025 Exhibit-R1(d) o The true copy of the complaint filed with the Commissioner of Police, Kannur dated 5/4/2025 by the petitioner herein Exhibit-R1(e) The true Copy of the Identity card of Identity Card issued by Kisan Service Society, Kannur dated nill Exhibit-R1(f) The true copy of the order in IA/3/2025 of OP 503/2025 dated 14/7/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter