Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumari Alakanandha S vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 7779 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7779 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2025

Kerala High Court

Kumari Alakanandha S vs State Of Kerala on 8 April, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

                                1

                                               2025:KER:30391
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 1101 OF 2025

PETITIONER/S:

    1     GEETHA
          AGED 51 YEARS
          C/O GIGIMON, VETTIKKATTIL (H), 200 ACRE, ADIMALY PO
          KERALA, PIN - 685561

    2     KUMARI ALAKANANDHA S
          AGED 14 YEARS
          MINOR REPRESENTED BY GRANDMOTHER SMT. GEETHA C/O
          GIGIMON, VETTIKKATTIL (H), 200 ACRE, ADIMALY PO
          KERALA, PIN - 685561

    3     MASTER ATHUL KRISHNA
          AGED 12 YEARS
          MINOR REPRESENTED BY GRANDMOTHER SMT. GEETHA C/O
          GIGIMON, VETTIKKATTIL (H), 200 ACRE, ADIMALY PO
          KERALA, PIN - 685561


          BY ADVS.
          IPSITA OJAL
          ANIL KUMAR K.P.
          MARIYAMMA A.K.
          MANAS P HAMEED
          ARYA ASHOKAN




RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN
          AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
          SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (DLSA) WAYANAD,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
 WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

                                2

                                               2025:KER:30391
          CIVIL STATION, MADATHUMPADI, KALPETTA, KERALA, PIN
          - 673121

    3     KERALA STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (KELSA),
          REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
          NIYAMA, SAHAYA BHAVAN, NEAR THE HIGH COURT BUILDING
          ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 682031

   *4     ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
          DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
   *5     FINANCE SECRETARY,
          DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA

          ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE SUO-MOTU
          IMPLEADED AS THE ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 IN
          THE WRIT PETITION.

          BY ADV LEO LUKOSE
          GP SRI.B.S.SYAMANTHAK
          GP SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.04.2025, ALONG WITH WP(C).1410/2025, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

                                3

                                                 2025:KER:30391

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 1410 OF 2025

PETITIONER/S:

          KUMARI ALAKANANDHA S
          AGED 14 YEARS
          MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS GRAND MOTHER SMT. GEETHA
          C/O GIGIMON, VETTIKKATTIL (H), 200 ACRE, ADIMALY PO
          KERALA, PIN - 685561


          BY ADVS.
          IPSITA OJAL
          ANIL KUMAR K.P.
          MARIYAMMA A.K.
          MANAS P HAMEED
          ARYA ASHOKAN




RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN
          AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
          SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (DLSA)WAYANAD,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
          CIVIL STATION, MADATHUMPADI, KALPETTA, KERALA, PIN
          - 673121

    3     KERALA STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (KELSA),
          REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
          NIYAMA, SAHAYA BHAVAN, HIGH COURT COMPOUND, KOCHI,
          ERNAKULAM, KERALA,, PIN - 682031

   *4     ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
          DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
 WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

                                4

                                               2025:KER:30391
   *5     FINANCE SECRETARY,
          DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA

          ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE SUO-MOTU
          IMPLEADED AS THE ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 IN
          THE WRIT PETITION.

          BY ADV LEO LUKOSE
          GP SRI.B.S.SYAMANTHAK


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.04.2025, ALONG WITH WP(C).1101/2025, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

                                 5

                                                    2025:KER:30391
                          C.S.DIAS, J.
           ----------------------------------------------
           WP(C) Nos.1101 & 1410 OF 2025
          -----------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 8th day of April, 2025

                  COMMON JUDGMENT

The writ petitions are filed to direct the 2 nd respondent ―

the District Legal Services Authority, Wayanad ― to disburse the

full and final compensation to the petitioners', who are the

petitioners in VCC Nos.5/2023 and 2/2022, as per the National

Legal Services Authority guidelines and the Kerala Victim

Compensation Scheme, 2021. As the writ petitions arise out of the

same incident, they are consolidated, jointly heard, and are being

disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of

convenience, the parties are referred to as in the party array in

W.P(C) No.1101/2025, which is treated as the leading case.

2. The 1st petitioner is the mother of late Nijitha

(deceased), who was married to Sanal Kumar (accused).

Petitioners 2 and 3 are the children born in the wedlock between

the deceased and accused. On 15.01.2022, the accused threw

acid on the deceased and the 2nd petitioner with the intention to

murder them. The deceased succumbed to burn injuries on WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 22.01.2022, and 2nd petitioner suffered 50 per cent burn injuries

and disfigurement. The Ambalavayal Police registered Ext.P1 FIR

against the accused. However, the accused committed suicide on

the same day. The petitioners are the legal heirs of the deceased.

Although the 2nd respondent had registered VCC No.5/2023 and

granted interim compensation to petitioners 2 and 3, the final

compensation has not been paid. The petition has been pending

for the last two years. Similarly, VCC No.2/2022 was suo motu

registered by the 2nd respondent due to the burn injuries suffered

by the 2nd petitioner. In the said petition also, the 2nd respondent

has only paid interim compensation to the 2 nd petitioner. As per the

NALSA guidelines, acid attack victims have to be paid

compensation within two months. The inaction of the respondents

is violative of the petitioners' fundamental right to life guaranteed

under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and is illegal and

arbitrary. Therefore, the respondents may be directed to disburse

the full compensation to the petitioners expeditiously.

3. The 3rd respondent has filed a statement in W.P.

(C)No.1101/2025, stating that VCC 2/2022 was suo motu

registered by the 2nd respondent based on a newspaper report that WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 nd the 2 petitioner suffered burn injuries due to the acid attack by

the accused. The 2nd petitioner was paid an interim compensation

of Rs.1,00,000/-. Subsequently, the petitioners filed an application

before the Judicial First-Class Magistrate-I, Sulthan Bathery, for

compensation under the scheme. The learned Magistrate referred

the application to the 2nd respondent, who registered VCC

No.5/2023. As the applications arose from the same incident, they

were clubbed together. As per Order No.94/2023, Rs.2,00,000/-

was paid to the 2nd petitioner as interim compensation in VCC

No.2/2022 and Rs.3,00,000/- was paid jointly to the petitioners 2

and 3 in VCC No.5/2023. The Probation Officer has certified that

the 2nd petitioner is entitled to a total compensation of

Rs.10,50,000/- and the petitioners 2 and 3 are entitled to a total

compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-. After deducting the interim

compensation already paid to the 2nd petitioner, she is entitled to a

balance compensation of Rs.7,50,000/- in VCC No.2/2022, and

petitioners 2 and 3 are entitled to a further compensation of

Rs.7,00,000/- in VCC No.5/2022. Accordingly, the 2 nd petitioner is

entitled to a total balance compensation of Rs.11,00,000/- in the

two applications and the 3rd petitioner is entitled to a balance WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 amount of Rs.3,50,000/- in VCC No.5/2023. The 2 nd respondent

has requested the Government to pay the balance compensation

to the petitioners immediately, but the Government has not paid

the amount due to paucity of funds. The writ petition may be

disposed of in the above manner.

4. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing

for the respondents 2 and 3.

5. Section 357 A was inserted in the Code of Criminal

Procedure by Act 5 of 2009 w.e.f. 31.12.2009 directing every State

Government, in coordination with the Central Government, to

prepare a scheme for compensating victims or their dependants

for the loss suffered by them in a crime. Section 357 A reads as

follows:

"357A.Victim Compensation Scheme (1) Every State Government, in co-ordination with the Central Government, shall prepare a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependents who have suffered loss or injury as a result of the crime and who require rehabilitation (2) Whenever a recommendation is made by the Court for compensation, the District Legal Services Authority or the State Legal Services Authority, as the case may be, shall decide the quantum of compensation to be awarded under the scheme referred to in sub-section (1).

(3) If the trial Court, at the conclusion of the trial, is satisfied, that the compensation awarded under Section 357 is not adequate for such rehabilitation, or where the cases end in acquittal or discharge and the victim has to be rehabilitated, it may make recommendation for compensation.

WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391

(4) Where the offender is not traced or identified, but the victim is identified, and where no trial takes place, the victim or his dependents may make an application to the State or the District Legal Services Authority for award of compensation.

(5) On receipt of such recommendations or on the application under sub-section (4), the State or the District Legal Services Authority shall, after due enquiry award adequate compensation by completing the enquiry within two months.

(6) The State or the District Legal Services Authority, as the case may be, to alleviate the suffering of the victim, may order for immediate first-aid facility or medical benefits to be made available free of cost on the certificate of the police officer not below the rank of the officer in charge of the police station or a Magistrate of the area concerned, or any other interim relief as the appropriate authority deems fit."

6. Sub-section (5) of Section 357 A mandates the

compensation to be awarded by completing the enquiry within two

months. It is based on the said provision that the Kerala Victim

Compensation Scheme has been formulated.

7. In Abhishek K.A v. State of Kerala (2020 (5) KHC 47),

this Court has emphatically declared that no victim shall be made

to wait for compensation.

8. This Court, in XXXX v. State of Kerala (2023 (5) KHC

406), has succinctly explained the salient features of the Kerala

Victim Compensation Scheme and the procedure to be followed in

paying compensation to the victims.

9. In Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar (AIR 1983 SC 1086),

the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the right to compensation is

an integral part of the right to life guaranteed under Art. 21 of the WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 Constitution.

10. In the cases at hand, Exts.R3 (a) and (b) proceedings

were passed on 25.01.2024 and 27.04.2024, respectively. The

entitlement of the petitioners 2 and 3 to compensation is also not

disputed by the respondents. As the accused is no more, the

criminal proceeding against him has abated. Therefore, there is no

legal impediment in paying the compensation to petitioners 2 and

3. The sole reason for the delay on the part of the Government in

paying the compensation is paucity of funds.

11. On analysing the benevolent intention of Section 357A

Cr.P.C, the Kerala Victim Compensation Scheme and the

exposition law on the above point, and further that more than 2

years have lapsed after the incident, paucity of funds, financial

constraints or a liquidity crunch are not justifiable reasons for the

respondents to delay the payment of compensation legally and

legitimately due to petitioners 2 and 3, who are orphan children

living in a state of vagrancy. It is the state's bounden duty and

liability to pay the petitioner's compensation in precedence to all

its other financial commitments and liabilities. I am convinced and

satisfied that the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court is to be WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 exercised in favour of the petitioners.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I allow the writ petitions in

the following manner:

(i) The additional respondents 4 and 5 are directed to

transfer Rs.14,50,000/- to the bank account of the 2 nd respondent

within one month from the date of production/receipt of a copy of

this judgment, failing which they will have to pay interest on the

said amount at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of

incident till the date of actual payment.

(ii) Immediately on receipt of the said amount, the 2 nd

respondent shall transfer Rs.1,00,000/- each to the savings bank

accounts of the petitioners 2 and 3. The 1 st petitioner is permitted

to withdraw the amount from the savings bank accounts of the

petitioners 2 and 3 to meet their urgent needs and expenses.

(iii) Out of the balance amount, the 2 nd respondent shall

deposit Rs.10,00,000/- and Rs.2,50,000/-, respectively, in the

names of petitioners 2 and 3, in fixed deposits in

nationalised/scheduled banks, which provide the highest rate of

interest, till the children attain majority. The Bank shall

automatically renew the fixed deposits on the basis of this WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 judgment, and a lien of the District and Sessions Judge, Wayand,

shall be marked on the fixed deposits. The bank shall credit the

interest on the fixed deposit on a quarterly basis to the savings

bank accounts of petitioners 2 and 3. The 1st petitioner is

permitted to withdraw the interest from the savings bank accounts

to meet the maintenance expenses of petitioners 2 and 3.

(iv) In case the petitioners 2 and 3 want to prematurely

withdraw any amount from the fixed deposit to meet any

unforeseen exigency, they would be at liberty to file an original

petition before the District Court, Wayanad, for the said purpose.

The District Court, Wayand, is directed to keep the fixed deposit

receipts in its safe custody till the children attain majority as

directed in this judgment. The Registry is directed to forward a

copy of this judgment to the District Court, Wayand.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rkc/08.04.25 WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1410/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.38/2022 DATED 15/01/2022 REGISTERED AT AMBALAVAYAL POLICE STATION WAYANAD WP(C) NO. 1101 & 1410 OF 2025

2025:KER:30391 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1101/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF FIR NO.38 OF 2022 DATED 15.01.2022 REGISTERED AMBALAYAL POLICE STATION WAYANAD

Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF SMT.NIJITHA ISSUED BY THE KOZHIKODE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UNDER REGISTRATION NUMBER 962/2022 ISSUED ON 09..01.2025

Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF MR.SANILKUMAR PC ISSUED BY THE THALASSEY MUNICIPALITY ON 23.05.2023

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Ext R3(a) True copy of the report in VCR 5 of 2023 prepared by the 2nd Respondent.

Ext R3(b) A true copy of Order No. 81/2024 dated 27.04.2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter