Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhulkhifili vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28318 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28318 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Dhulkhifili vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                              2024:KER:71323

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

   WEDNESDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 3RD

                          ASWINA, 1946

                  CRL.MC NO. 7380 OF 2024

   CRIME NO.452/2021 OF Meenangadi Police Station,

                            Wayanad

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.639 OF

2021     OF    JUDICIAL    MAGISTRATE    OF   FIRST    CLASS

,SULTHANBATHERY

PETITIONER/S:

   1       DHULKHIFILI
           AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN, EDAVALOM VEEDU, PINANGODE
           P.O, ACHOORANAM, WAYANAD-, PIN - 673121

   2       SHABEEB.C,
           AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O. ISMAIL, CHERUKADATHU VEEDU, PINANGODE
           P.O, VENGAPPALLY, WAYANAD-, PIN - 67312

   3       SHABEEB,
           AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O. ANTHRU, NEDIYARAMBATH HOUSE, PINANGODE,
           P.O.VENGAPPALLY, WAYANAD-, PIN - 673121

   4       FAJIS.P,
           AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O. KUNJAPPA, PUTHENPURAYIL VEEDU, PINANGODE
 Crl.M.C.No.7380 of 2024




                                                           2024:KER:71323
                                  -2-


             P.O, VENGAPPALLY, WAYANAD-, PIN - 673121

     5       SAMSHEED
             AGED 41 YEARS
             S/O. MOIDEEN, MAMMINIPATTU, PINANGODE P.O,
             VENGAPPALLY, WAYANAD-, PIN - 673121


             BY ADVS.
             K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN
             DEEPA K.RADHAKRISHNAN
             JISSMON A KURIAKOSE
             SANAL C.S
             SIDHARTHAN M.T.


RESPONDENT/S:

     1       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
             OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

     2       SHAMEER R.K,
             AGED 40 YEARS
             S/O. FATHIMA, ARAKKATTIL HOUSE, ANAPARAVAYAL,
             MUTTIL SOUTH VILLAGE, MUTTIL P.O, VAITHIRI,
             WAYANAD DISTRICT-, PIN - 673122



OTHER PRESENT:

             SMT. SREEJA V (PP)


         THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   25.09.2024,    THE   COURT   ON    THE   SAME   DAY    PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.7380 of 2024




                                                                2024:KER:71323
                                      -3-



                                  ORDER

Dated this the 25th day of September, 2024

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction

under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to quash all

proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused 1 to 5 in C.C.

No.639 of 2021 on the files of the Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Sulthanbathery,

arising out of Crime No.452 of 2021 of Meenangadi

Police Station, Wayanad, registered for the

offences under Sections 143, 147, 341, 323 and

324 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860. The 2nd respondent is the de facto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused

had on 11.07.2021 formed themselves into an

2024:KER:71323

unlawful assembly and assaulted the de facto

complainant and thereby committed the offences

alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel for the

respondents, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners

submitted that the matter has been settled and

hence the proceedings against the petitioners

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no

purpose would be served by continuing the

proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and

Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has

held that in appropriate cases, the High Court

2024:KER:71323

can take note of the amicable resolution of

disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to

put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view

was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v.

State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466]

and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of

Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 affidavit

filed by the 2nd respondent. The learned Public

Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification,

it is understood that the affidavit is genuine,

and the defacto complainant stands by the

contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter

has been settled and no public interest is

involved in this case. There is no impediment for

granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an

2024:KER:71323

exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the

petitioners in C.C. No.639 of 2021 on the files

of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Sulthanbathery are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE Scl/

2024:KER:71323

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure-A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 452/2021 ALONG WITH FIS DATED 16/7/2021 OF MEENANGADI POLICE STATION, WAYANAD DISTRICT

Annexure-A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 22/7/2021 IN CRIME NO.

452/2021 OF MEENANGADI POLICE STATION FILED BEFORE THE JFCM-1, SULTHAN BATHERY

Annexure-A3 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 24.07.2024 SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter