Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28014 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
Monday, the 23rd day of September 2024 / 1st Aswina, 1946
WA NO. 1247 OF 2024
AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 09.07.2024 IN WP(C) 17501/2015 OF THIS COURT
APPELLANT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
M/S TASTY NUTS INDUSTRIES, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER
MUHAMMED NOUFAL, K.P. ROAD, KILIKOLLUR, KOLLAM , PIN - 691004
BY ADV.B.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
1. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
ORGANISATION, REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND
COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691001
2. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI, PIN - 110001
BY ADVS.M/S.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR , AKASH S., GIRISH KUMAR M S & RICHU
THERESA FOR R1
Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment of the
Learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No: 17501/2015 dated 09/07/2024 till the
disposal of this Writ Appeal.
This Writ Appeal coming on for orders along with connected cases on
23/09/2024 upon perusing the appeal memorandum, the court on the same day
passed the following:
AMIT RAWAL & EASWARAN S, JJ.
-------------------------------------------------------
WA No.1246, 1247, 1379 of 2024
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2024
ORDER
Amit Rawal, J.
Mr.B.Mohanlal, inter alia submits that the appellate
Tribunal set aside the order passed under Section 7A of the Act
on the premise that the appellants were not given proper
opportunity whereas the aforementioned order was assailed in
this Court through the writ petition on behalf of the Central
Board of Trustees and others. Not only the objection with
regard to the maintainability but as far as the illegality of the
order was also assailed on the premise that the inspection done
by the Enforcement officer and the report submitted thereon to
the enquiry officer had not seen the light of the day nor was
supplied to the establishment for perusal.
Issue notice before admission to the 2 nd respondent.
Sri. Pirappancode V.S Sudhir accepts notice. In the meantime,
there shall be an interim stay of the judgment under appeal.
Post on 20.11.2024.
SD/-
AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
SD/-
EASWARAN S, JUDGE
sab
23-09-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!