Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sheena Sajithan vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 27330 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27330 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sheena Sajithan vs State Of Kerala on 11 September, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

                                                         2024:KER:69365

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

   WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 20TH BHADRA, 1946

                       WP(C) NO. 23011 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

          SHEENA SAJITHAN,
          AGED 52 YEARS,
          W/O. LATE MANAPARAMBIL CHATHU SAJITHAN, MC AUDIOS AND
          VIDEOS, XXI/955, KOOLIYADAN PLAZA, VELLANGALLUR,
          THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680 662.


          BY ADVS.
          LAL K.JOSEPH
          P.MURALEEDHARAN (THURAVOOR)
          T.A.LUXY
          SURESH SUKUMAR
          ANZIL SALIM
          SANJAY SELLEN
          ANUPAMA




RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

    2     THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX,
          SGST DEPARTMENT TAX COMPLEX, KARAMANA,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 002.

    3     THE STATE TAX OFFICER,
          TAX PAYER SERVICE CIRCLE, IRINJALAKUDA, PIN - 680 125.
 WP(C) NO. 23011 OF 2024
                                  2

                                                     2024:KER:69365

     4     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (RECOVERY),
           OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, TAX PAYER
           SERVICE CIRCLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 004.

           BY SMT.JASMINE M M, GP


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
11.09.2024,    THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 23011 OF 2024
                                   3

                                                        2024:KER:69365

                             JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed by the legal heir of late

Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan, against whom certain proceedings

were initiated under the provisions of the CGST / SGST Acts by issuing

a notice on 25.09.2020. According to the petitioner, a reply was filed to

the said notice on 18.02.2021. It is submitted that late Manaparambil

Chathu Sajithan expired on 02.03.2023 and after his death and more

than two years after filing of the reply, Ext.P5 order and Ext.P5 (a)

proceedings have been issued in the name of the deceased namely late

Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan. It is submitted that presently

Revenue Recovery proceedings have also been initiated against the

petitioner as the legal heir of late Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The

learned Government Pleader with reference to the counter affidavit

submits that the death of late Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan was not

intimated to the Officer and it is in such circumstances that Ext.P5

order and Ext.P5(a) proceedings came to be issued in the name of the

dead person.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader and having regard to the fact that

Ext.P4 death certificate indicates that late Manaparambil Chathu WP(C) NO. 23011 OF 2024

2024:KER:69365

Sajithan expired on 02.03.2023 and on the short ground that Ext.P5

order and Ext.P5(a) proceedings appear to have been issued only on

15.06.2023 in the name of late Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan, Ext.P5

and P5(a) are quashed, making it clear that the proceedings may be

continued and culminated against the petitioner, who is stated to be

the legal heir of late Manaparambil Chathu Sajithan. Fresh orders shall

be passed only after affording an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner. As a consequence of quashing Exts.P5 and P5(a), Ext.P6

Revenue Recovery proceedings will also stand quashed. Considering

the fact that the proceedings which were culminated in Ext.P5 order

and Ext.P5(a) proceedings is being set aside only on the ground that it

was completed against a deceased person, it is also clarified that the

de-novo adjudication can be culminated against the petitioner within a

period of six months from today, not withstanding any period of

limitation.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 23011 OF 2024

2024:KER:69365

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23011/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DATED 17/7/2018

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE IN ASMT 10 BEARING REFERENCE NO 32DCTPS0163A1ZU/2017-18 DATED 25-09-2020

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DETAILED REPLY IN FORM GST ASMT 11 DATED 18/02/2021

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE COCHIN CORPORATION DATED 13/03/2023

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.32BCTPS0163AIZU/2017-18 DATED 15.06.2023

Exhibit P5(a) TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE FORM GST DRC-07 DATED 15/06/2023

Exhibit P6 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 5/2/2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter