Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 30954 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30954 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner on 23 October, 2024

Author: Sathish Ninan

Bench: Sathish Ninan

                                                          2024:KER:79254
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

                                  &

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN

   WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 1ST KARTHIKA, 1946

                        RP NO. 1064 OF 2024

        AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.09.2024 IN WP(C) NO.9438 OF

                   2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

                               -----

REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:

    1     BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.,
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR,
          BHARAT BHAVAN, OPPOSITE GRAND HOTEL, 4 & 6 CURRIMBHOY
          ROAD, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI, PIN - 400001.

    2     THE SENIOR MANAGER (FINANCE) (SF),
          SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
          1, RANGANATHAN GARDEN, 11TH MAIN ROAD, PB NO. 1212 &
          1213, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI, PIN - 600040.

    3     THE GENERAL MANAGER (FINANCE),
          BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION, POST BAG NO. 2,
          AMBALAMUGHAL, KOCHI, PIN - 682302.


          BY ADVS.
          S.PARVATHI
          T.K.SREEKALA
          NIKITHA SUSAN PAULSON
          ANAND GEO
          V.V.ASOKAN (SR.)
                                                                     2024:KER:79254
RP NO. 1064 OF 2024                      -2-



RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND 4TH RESPONDENT:

       1        THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682013.

       2        UNION OF INDIA,
                REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE,
                4TH FLOOR, A-WING, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI,
                PIN - 110001.


                BY ADV P.R.AJITH KUMAR


       THIS      REVIEW   PETITION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION    ON
23.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                    2024:KER:79254



                     SATHISH NINAN &
                   JOHNSON JOHN, JJ.
          = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                R.P. No.1064 OF 2024 in
                W.P.(C) No.9438 of 2014
          = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2024

                       O R D E R

Sathish Ninan, J.

The grievance of the review petitioner is with

regard to the direction contained in paragraphs 58 and

59 of the judgment directing payment of an amount of

₹ 18 Crores with interest.

2. The said amount of ₹ 18 Crores is the tax dues

claimed for the period from 2000 - 2001 to 2013 - 2014.

3. According to the review petitioner, pending the

proceedings there was an Amnesty Scheme under which the

liability for various periods noted above was settled.

It is also stated that, with regard to the remaining

period there are orders of stay of recovery by this

Court in various writ petitions. The above was omitted

to be brought to the notice of this Court during the R.P. No.1064 OF 2024 in

2024:KER:79254

course of hearing, submits the learned senior counsel.

4. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,

we are of the opinion that it would be sufficient if the

Assessing Officer takes into consideration the aforesaid

aspects and intimates the assessee(review petitioner)

with regard to the tax presently payable for the

aforesaid periods. Such process may be undertaken with

due notice to the assessee and be completed within

fifteen days from today.

5. On completing the process as above, the

Assessing Officer shall inform the assessee/review

petitioner of the amount payable. Such amount shall be

paid by the review petitioner within one month from the

date of receipt of such intimation. On default, the said

amount will attract interest as ordered in the judgment

dated 11.09.2024.

R.P. No.1064 OF 2024 in

2024:KER:79254

6. With the above clarification, this review

petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

SATHISH NINAN JUDGE

Sd/-

JOHNSON JOHN JUDGE kns/-

//True Copy//

P.S. To Judge 2024:KER:79254

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 03.12.2021

Annexure B TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT DATED 03.12.2021 EVIDENCING AMNESTY SETTLEMENT FOR AY 2004-05 (KGST) AND 2005-06 (CST)

Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM

AND 234 OF 2018

Annexure D TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPELLATE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM DATED 31.07.2015 IN STA 189/2014 (2006-07 KGST)

Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE AUDITED CLOSING SHEET OF SUNDRY CREDITOR FORMING PART OF THE AUDITED BALANCE SHEET FOR THE AY 2023-24

-----

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter