Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suni B.T vs Vinayaka Granites
2024 Latest Caselaw 30533 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30533 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Suni B.T vs Vinayaka Granites on 25 October, 2024

Author: V.G.Arun

Bench: V.G.Arun

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR
                                     &
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
                                     &
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
          Friday, the 25th day of October 2024 / 3rd Karthika, 1946
         CONTEMPT APP(C) NO. 5 OF 2024(S) IN CONTEMPT CASE(C) 2773/2023

    APPELLANT/ADDITIONAL 2ND RESPONDENT:


           SUNI B.T, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O AJITHKUMAR,

           FORMER SECRETARY OF KONNI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KONNI P.O,

           PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 697, RESIDING AT UTHRADAM, THUNDUVILA,

           NEMOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 020.

        BY ADVOCATES M/S. S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI & THAJUNA MARIA FRANCIS

    RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND 1ST RESPONDENT:


       1. VINAYAKA GRANITES, PAYYANAMON P.O, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SMT. RAJAMMA THOMAS, PIN - 689 692.
       2. DIPU P.K, SECRETARY, KONNI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KONNI P.O.,
          PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 691.



      ADVOCATES M/S. ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL, S.SREEDEV, RONY JOSE, LEO
      LUKOSE, KAROL MATHEWS SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, DERICK MATHAI SAJI, KARAN
      SCARIA ABRAHAM & ITTOOP JOY THATTIL FOR R1

     This Contempt appeals (civil) having come up for orders on
25.10.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:


                                                           P.T.O.
          NITIN JAMDAR, C.J., V. G. ARUN, J. & S. MANU, J.
         --------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Contempt Appeal (C) No.5 of 2024
           ----------------------------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 25th day of October, 2024

                                    ORDER

Nitin Jamdar, C.J.

Heard Sri. S. Mohammed Al Rafi, learned counsel for the Appellant and Sri. Enoch David Simon Joel, learned counsel for Respondent No.1.

2. This reference is placed before the Full Bench on the administrative order passed in the light of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 13 August 2024 in Contempt Appeal (C) No.5 of 2024 in the case of Suni B.T. v. Vinayaka Granites and Another. The Division Bench directed the Registry to place the matter before the Larger Bench since the Division Bench has expressed their inability to agree with the view taken by another Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sunil C. (Dr.) v. Dr. Selsa S. [Contempt Appeal (C) No.8 of 2023 dated 13 February 2024].

3. Reference is made to the Full Bench as per the provisions of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 (Act of 1958). Section 7 of the Act of 1958 deals with the procedure for the Full Bench to decide the question of law, which is referred. Section 7, therefore, contemplates that to enable the Full Bench to decide the question of law, it should be crystalised in the referral order.

4. We have gone through the reference order in Suni B.T. and also the judgment of the Division Bench in Sunil C. The Division Bench in Suni

B.T. has expressed inability to agree with the view taken by the other Division Bench in Sunil C. However, the reference order has not crystalised the question that the Full Bench is called upon to decide. One option would be to place the matter before the Division Bench which has made the reference to specify the question to be answered. However, since the issue requires closure at the earliest, with the assistance of the counsel for the parties, we have crystalised the question to be decided, which arises from the divergence of views between the two Division Benches.

5. The question is as under:-

"Whether an appeal is maintainable under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 when the Court, after forming a prima facie opinion, proceeds to frame charge under Rule 14(b) of the Contempt of Courts (High Court of Kerala) Rules framed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971."

6. The power of the High Court to punish for contempt under Article 215 of the Constitution of India also may arise for consideration.

7. Post on 15 November 2024. Summary of submissions and compilation of decisions, which counsel seek to rely, shall be furnished before the next date of posting.

Sd/-

NITIN JAMDAR CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

V. G. ARUN JUDGE Sd/-

                                                                       S. MANU
                                                                        JUDGE
       Jvt & krj                     //TRUE COPY//
                                                     P.A. TO C.J.


25-10-2024                       /True Copy/                              Assistant Registrar
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter