Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rejith R vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 29851 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29851 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Rejith R vs State Of Kerala on 22 October, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                      2024:KER:79771

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

     TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 30TH ASWINA, 1946

                       CRL.MC NO. 8095 OF 2024

    CRIME NO.2276/2015 OF Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.163 OF 2016 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , ADOOR

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            REJITH R
            AGED 33 YEARS
            S/O RETNAKARAN, PALAVILAYIL VEEDU, PERINGANADU P.O,
            PERINGANADU VILLAGE , ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA,
            PIN - 691551


            BY ADVS.
            AJITH MURALI
            MOHANAN M.K.




RESPONDENTS/STATE, COMPLAINANT & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,, PIN - 682031

    2       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            ADOOR POLICE STATION, ADOOR ,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
            PIN - 691523

    3       GEEVARGHESE ABRAHAM
            AGED 86 YEARS
            S/O LATE P.S ABRAHAM , PALLATHU PUTHEN VEEDU ,
            KARUVATTA , ADOOR P.O, ADOOR TALUK , PATHANAMTHITTA
            DISTRICT,, PIN - 691523
 CRL.MC NO. 8095 OF 2024          2


                                                    2024:KER:79771


          BY ADVS.
          SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)
          SRI. K.V ANIL KUMAR


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8095 OF 2024               3


                                                                2024:KER:79771

                       BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                  ---------------------------------------------
                        Crl.M.C.No.8095 of 2024
              ----------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2024

                                 ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section

528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash

all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C. No.163/2016 on

the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor,

arising out of Crime No.2276/2015 of Adoor Police Station,

Pathanamthitta, registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 447, 506(I), 323 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860. The third respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

06.09.2015 trespassed into the courtyard of the de facto

complainant and assaulted him inflicting grievous injuries, and

thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned

Public Prosecutor.

2024:KER:79771

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings

against the petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also

submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no

purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

[(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in

appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable

resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to

put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was

reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab

and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and

Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC

653].

7. I have perused Annexure-C affidavit filed by third

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that

upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine,

and the defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I

am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public

interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for

granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the

proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

2024:KER:79771

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner

in C.C. No.163/2016 on the files of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court, Adoor, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJ

2024:KER:79771

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure-A THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

2276/2015 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION DATED 7.9.2015.

Annexure-B A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.

2276/2015 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION DATED 19.11.2015.

Annexure-C A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.9.2024.

Annexure-D THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGAGEMENT INVITATION LETTER OF THE PETITIONER.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter