Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devikalyani B vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 29438 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29438 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Devikalyani B vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2024

                                                         2024:KER:77357

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

    THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 25TH ASWINA, 1946

                         WP(C) NO. 5896 OF 2022

PETITIONER:

              DEVIKALYANI B.,
              AGED 42 YEARS
              W/O. NANDA KUMAR, AMBADI, S.K NAGAR 202,
              ASRAMAM WEST, KOLLAM- 691 002.

              BY ADV B.MOHANLAL


RESPONDENTS:

              STATE OF KERALA,
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE
     1
              DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

              THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
              COLLECTORATE, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
     2
              695043.

              THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SUB COLLECTOR)
              COLLECTORATE, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
     3
              695 043.

              THE TAHASILDAR (LR)
              TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
     4
              695 121.

              THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
              ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE, ATHIYANNOOR P.O.,
     5
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695123.

     6        THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
              KRISHI BHAVAN, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
 WP(C) No.5896 of 2022
                                   2


                                                         2024:KER:77357


            695 021 (THE CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
            CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KERALA PADDY
            AND WET LAND ACT 2008).


            BY ADV

            SMT.DEVI SHRI R., GP

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.10.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.5896 of 2022
                                       3


                                                               2024:KER:77357


                        MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
                      -------------------------------------
                        W.P(C) No.5896 of 2022
           -----------------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 17th day of October, 2024


                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges Ext.P8, an order passed by the Local

Level Monitoring Committee rejecting the petitioner's request to delete

her property from the data bank.

2. Earlier the petitioner had approached this Court by filing

W.P.(C) No.5148/2017, in which an interim order was passed directing

the Agricultural Officer to seek a report about the lie and nature of the

property as it remained on the date of coming into force of the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the

Director, Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre

(KSREC). It was also directed that upon receipt of the report, the LLMC

will pass orders on whether the petitioner's property is to be retained

in the data bank. The said writ petition was finally disposed of by

judgment dated 20.10.2017 along with a batch of cases, directing the

petitioners to prefer applications in the prescribed form before the

Local Level Monitoring Committee to correct entries in the data bank

2024:KER:77357

concerning their properties. Ext.P8 was the order passed pursuant to

the directions above noted.

3. Ext.P8, noticed that about 43 coconut trees aged more than

27 years. However, it found that the property in question is

waterlogged and therefore, rejected the request of the petitioner to

remove the same from the data bank.

4. A statement has been filed on behalf of the 3rd respondent,

contending that the petitioner has to make an application under Form-

5, as the application filed under Rule 3(a), for regularization of the

unauthorized reclamation of land could not be considered, as the

section was deleted on 23.11.2016. The said stand of the Government

is contrary to the judgment of this Court in Lalu P.S. v. State of

Kerala and Others [2020 (5) KHC 490] wherein this Court held

even after the amendment of the Rules on 30.12.2017, an application

can be preferred before the Local Level Monitoring Committee.

5. Though Ext.P8 notices the existence of coconut trees aged

more than 27 years, the only reason for rejecting the request of the

petitioner to remove the property from the data bank was that the

same was waterlogged. The same cannot be a reason either to include

the property as paddy land or wetland more so in the light of the

judgment of this Court in Mather Nagar Residents Association &

Another v. District Collector Ekm and Ors [2020 (2) KHC 94]

2024:KER:77357

wherein it was held that merely because a property is lying fallow and

gets waterlogged during rainy season or otherwise, it cannot be

termed as paddy land or wet land going by the Paddy Land And Wet

Land Act, 2008.

6. Going by the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy

Land and Wetland Act, 2008, "paddy land" is defined as all types of

land situated in the State where paddy is cultivated at least once in a

year or suitable for paddy cultivation but uncultivated and left fallow,

and includes its allied constructions like bunds, drainage channels,

ponds and canals. As per Sec.5(4), the Local Leval Monitoring

Committee have the power to prepare the data bank with the details of

the cultivable paddy land and wetland, within the area of jurisdiction of

the Committee, with the help of the map prepared or to be prepared

by the State Land Use Board or Centre-State Science and Technology

Institutions based on satellite pictures by incorporating the survey

numbers and extent in the data-bank and get it notified by the

concerned Panchayat/Municipality/Corporation, in such manner. A

reading of the above would show that what is to be included in a data

bank are the details of the cultivable paddy land and wetland. Of

course, taking note of the definition of paddy land as mentioned above,

such an exercise to find out whether a property is a paddy land or

whether it is cultivable or non-cultivable has to be ascertained taking

2024:KER:77357

into account the natural features of the land whether it is fit for

cultivation or not. The most relevant aspect therefore is to find

whether the land is fit for paddy cultivation.

7. Given the above discussion, since there is no finding in

Ext.P8 that the property is paddy field or cultivable one, Ext.P8 cannot

be sustained, and the same is accordingly quashed. There will be a

direction to the Local Level Monitoring Committee of which the 6th

respondent is the convener to pass fresh orders in the light of the

observations made above, within three months from the date of receipt

of a copy of this judgment.

The impugned order is quashed, and the writ petition is allowed

as above.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE SCB

2024:KER:77357

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5896/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 03-04-2017 FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 ISSUED BY EXHIBIT P1 THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DATA BANK OF THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY ISSUED EXHIBIT P2 BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF 175/16 DATED 05-03-2016, MAHAZAR LOCATION SKETCH AND A CALCULATION SHEET FORWARDED BY THE 5TH EXHIBIT P3 RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FROM THE 5TH RESPONDENT

THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20-01- 2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE EXHIBIT P4 RESPONDENTS 2,5 AND 6 AND ITS POSTAL RECEIPT

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15-02-2017 EXHIBIT P5 IN W.P(C) NO. 5148/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20-04-2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 6TH EXHIBIT P6 RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT P5

THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 20-10-2017 IN W.P(C) NO. 5148/2017 OF THIS EXHIBIT P7 HON'BLE COURT

THE TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. KBN 11/2020-2021 DATED 04-03-2021 ISSUED BY THE LOCAL LEVEL EXHIBIT P8 MONITORING COMMITTEE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter