Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 29123 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2024
2024:KER:75814
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 18TH ASWINA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 34832 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
M/S. KOYENCO FEEDS P LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR JASIQUE PONNAM PARAMBATH
KOYENCO HOUSE, KANNUR ROAD, WEST HILL, KOZHIKODE,
PIN - 673 005.
BY ADVS.
K.P.ABDUL AZEES
T.ARCHANA
BABY SAHLA B.
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 3RD FLOOR, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING,
SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110 001.
2 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI,
PIN - 110 001.
3 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY (TAXES), SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
4 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, KOZHIKODE RANGE II,
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE,
PIN - 673 001.
BY ADVS.
V GIRISHKUMAR (SC),
THUSHARA JAMES (SR GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:75814
WP(C) 34832/2024 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the
fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit
on account of the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of
Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the year 2019-20, through
Ext.P1 order dated 14.08.2024.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that, with the notification of sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the
CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner would now be entitled to the
benefit of input tax credit which has been denied to the petitioner
though Ext.P1 order.
3. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader and the
learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4 also.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, the learned Senior Government Pleader and the
learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and 4
and having regard to the assertion of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner that on account of notification of
Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the
petitioner will be entitled to input tax credit, which has been 2024:KER:75814
denied to the petitioner by Ext.P1 order, the writ petition will
stand disposed of, setting aside Ext.P1 to the extent that it denied
input tax credit to the petitioner on account of the provisions of
sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts and
directing the competent authority to pass fresh orders, after
taking note of the provisions contained in Section 16(5) of the
CGST/SGST Acts and after affording an opportunity of hearing to
the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats 2024:KER:75814
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34832/2024
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE COPY OF THE ORDER IN ORIGINAL NO.
40/24-25/GST/SUPDT DATED 14/08/2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!