Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.N. Sathyapalan vs The Senior Divisional Commercial ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 28888 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28888 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

P.N. Sathyapalan vs The Senior Divisional Commercial ... on 3 October, 2024

Author: V.G.Arun

Bench: V.G.Arun

                                                          2024:KER:73239
WP(C) NO. 34548 OF 2024               1


                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

      THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946

                          WP(C) NO. 34548 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:

              P.N. SATHYAPALAN
              AGED 61 YEARS
              SON OF MR. ARAVINDAN, PONNULLI HOUSE, NEDUMPARA PO,
              THRISSUR, PIN - 679531.


              BY ADVS.
              ANIL S.RAJ
              K.N.RAJANI
              RADHIKA RAJASEKHARAN P.
              ANILA PETER
              SIMI S. ALI
              ARSHID.M.S.
              SARITHA K.S.



RESPONDENT/S:

      1       THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANGER, SOUTHERN
              RAILWAY
              DIVISIONAL OFFICE, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, KOZHIKODE -
              PALAKKAD HIGHWAY, KALLEKKULANGARA, OLAVAKODE, PALAKKAD,
              KERALA, PIN - 678002.

      2       THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL MANAGER
              SHORNUR RAILWAY STATION, SHORNUR, PIN - 679001.

              SRI. T.C. KRISHNA, DSGI IN CHARGE


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                    2024:KER:73239
WP(C) NO. 34548 OF 2024                     2




                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner was issued with licence to operate a

catering stall at Shornur Junction Railway Station. While so,

a complaint was raised by a passenger that a dead frog was

found in the food served from the petitioner's stall. The

petitioner was thereupon issued with a show cause notice,

followed by an order, terminating the contract and directing

removal of his stall. Alleging that the termination order was

passed without providing an opportunity of hearing, the

petitioner preferred W.P.(C) No.31943 of 2024. That writ

petition was disposed of, directing the respondents to grant

an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Accordingly a

hearing was conducted on 27.9.2024 and the present

impugned order passed, affirming the earlier order of

termination.

2024:KER:73239

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended

that the petitioner's explanation is not adverted to in the

impugned order and, the order is passed based on reasons

which were hitherto not mentioned or brought to the

petitioner's notice. The order is also challenged on the

ground that, deficiency in service would attract only penalty

in the first instance and licence can be terminated only on

recurrence of deficiencies.

3. The learned Central Government Counsel submits

that the writ petition is not maintainable in view of the

alternative remedy, by way of appeal and provision for

arbitration, contained in the Master Circular.

4. Having heard the counsel, this Court does not find

any extraordinary circumstance, warranting invocation of the

writ jurisdiction, particularly in view of the alternative

remedies available to the petitioner. The earlier order was set 2024:KER:73239

aside as it was passed in violation of the principles of natural

justice. The present impugned order having been passed

after hearing the petitioner, his remedy is to challenge the

order before the appropriate forum.

The writ petition is hence dismissed, leaving it open

for the petitioner to approach the proper forum.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN JUDGE Sru 2024:KER:73239

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34548/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF AWARD BEARING NO:J/C.79/TENDER-2016/SRR-013 DATED 13.5.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RENEWAL ORDER DATED 24.7.2023 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.6.2024.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED 22.6.2024.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 9.7.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.7.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.8.2024.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTE DATED 27.9.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AT THE HEARING.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.9.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED UNDER FSS ACT, 2006 TO SMT. SANDHYA, M/S VISHNUMAYA FOOD PRODUCTS.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO:C/SECR/BSP/CATG/IRCTC/POLICY DATED 18.9.2023 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY TO THE GROUP GENERAL MANAGER, IRCTC, SOUTH ZONE, SECUNDERABAD.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter