Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amal V Nawaz vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28799 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28799 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Amal V Nawaz vs State Of Kerala on 3 October, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                   2024:KER:73477

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

  THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946

                        CRL.MC NO. 8001 OF 2024

   CRIME NO.465/2020 OF Edathala Police Station, Ernakulam

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.256 OF 2021

OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, ALUVA


PETITIONER/ACCUSED 4:

            AMAL V NAWAZ
            AGED 27 YEARS
            S/O MOIDEEN MUHAMMAD NAWAZ, VYLLOPILLIL HOUSE,
            JAWAHAR NAGAR, CHOORNIKARA KARA, THAIKKATTUKARA
            P.O., ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM,
            PIN - 683 106.

            BY ADVS.
            AJAI JOHN
            V.M.SAJAN


RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.

    2       ANOOP @ JO VARGHESE
            AGED 44 YEARS
            S/O VARGHESE, KOYIKKARA HOUSE, SOCIETYPADY,
            KEEZHMADU VILLAGE, EDATHALA, ERNAKULAM RURAL,
            PIN - 683 112.

            SRI. C.N. PRABHAKARAN (PP)
            ADV. RAKHY BABY FOR R2


        THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C. No. 8001 of 2024
                                 :2:                     2024:KER:73477

                  BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                -------------------------------------------
                    Crl.M.C.No. 8001 of 2024
           ----------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2024


                               ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash all

proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the 4th accused in C.C. No.256/2021 on the

files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Aluva which arise

out of Crime No.465/2020 of Edathala Police Station, Ernakulam

registered for the offences under Sections 447, 341, 323, and 324

read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2nd

respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

28.05.2020 trespassed into the residence of the complainant and

dragged him out and assaulted him with an iron road, thereby

committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

:3: 2024:KER:73477

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be

served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

[(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate

cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of

disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to

the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder

Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6

SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of

Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 affidavit filed by the 2 nd

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that

upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and

the defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am

satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is

involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the

prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only

be an exercise in futility.

:4: 2024:KER:73477

8. Accordingly, all proceedings as against the petitioner

alone in C.C. No.256/2021 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of

First Class-I, Aluva are quashed.

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed as above.

Sd/-

                                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
SCB                                            JUDGE

                                :5:                 2024:KER:73477






PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1             CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.

465/2020 OF EDATHALA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM RURAL.

Annexure A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CC/256/2021 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I AT ALUVA.

Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE DE-

FACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 25/09/2024 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MAYBE MARKED AS ANNEXURE A3.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter