Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Haridas vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28798 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28798 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Haridas vs State Of Kerala on 3 October, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                          2024:KER:73346

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

     THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946

                       CRL.MC NO. 7301 OF 2024

        CRIME NO.167/2019 OF Nenmara Police Station, Palakkad

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.398 OF 2019 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,ALATHUR

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1-5:

    1       HARIDAS
            AGED 40 YEARS
            S/O.RAMADAS, MUTHALAPPARA HOUSE, NENMARA,
            PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

    2       SUNIL.C.C
            AGED 40 YEARS
            S/O.CHACKO, PUZHACKALTHARA, KANIMANGALAM,
            NENMARA, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

    3       SUNNY JOSEPH
            AGED 52 YEARS
            S/O.JOSEPH, MALAYAKKANDATHIL VEEDU, PEZHUMPARA,
            CHATHAMANGALAM.P.O, NENMARA,
            PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

    4       SUJI
            AGED 45 YEARS
            S/O.VASUDEVAN, THOTTATHIL VEEDU, MATTUPARA,
            NENMARA, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

    5       RADHAKRISHNAN
            AGED 48 YEARS
            S/O.APPU, PARAMADA VEEDU, MATTUPARA,
            NENMARA, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

            BY ADV
               V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
 CRL.MC NO. 7301 OF 2024           2



                                                          2024:KER:73346



RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/CW1:

     1     STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

     2     MOHANAN
           AGED 63 YEARS
           S/O.KRISHNAN, MUTHALAPPARA HOUSE,
           NENMARA, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678508

           BY ADV
              T.J.MARIA GORETTI
              SRI. C.N. PRABHAKARAN (PP)


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   03.10.2024,    THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY    PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 7301 OF 2024           3



                                                           2024:KER:73346

                 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                  --------------------------------------
                    Crl.M.C No.7301 of 2024
                 ---------------------------------------
                Dated this 3rd day of October, 2024

                               ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528

BNSS to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are the accused 1 to 5 in C.C. No.398 of 2019

on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Alathur

arising out of Crime No.167 of 2019 of Nenmara Police Station,

Palakkad. 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

21.04.2019 formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and

assaulted the defacto complainant thereby committed the offence

under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, and 324 r/w Section 149 of

the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be

served by continuing the proceedings.

2024:KER:73346

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012)

10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the

High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes

between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and

Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another

[(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure 2 affidavit filed by the 2nd

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the

defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied

that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in

this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for

quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an

exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in

C.C. No.398 of 2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court, Alathur are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

MSA

2024:KER:73346

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C.NO.398/2019 OF THE COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I, ALATHUR

Annexure 2 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 08.08.2024 SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN EVIDENCING THE FACTUM OF SETTLEMENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter