Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Biju vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28746 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28746 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Biju vs State Of Kerala on 3 October, 2024

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

                                                           2024:KER:73213



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

    THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946

                       BAIL APPL. NO. 7404 OF 2024

     CRIME NO.100/2024 OF KOLLAM EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KOLLAM

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 31.08.2024 IN CRMP NO.5041

OF 2024 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, KOLLAM


PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:

            BIJU,
            AGED 47 YEARS
            S/O.BHARATHAN SARMAN,
            ATTUPURATHU VADAKKATHIL VEEDU,
            SINKARA PALLI, EAST KALLADA,
            KOLLAM -, PIN - 691502

            BY ADVS.
            K.SIJU
            S.ABHILASH
            ANJANA KANNATH
            MARIYA JOSE


RESPONDENTS/STATE:

    1       STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2       EXCISE RANGE OFFICER,
            KOLLAM EXCISE RANGE,
            KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691001


            BY SMT. SEETHA. S
            SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS    BAIL    APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
03.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                2024:KER:73213
B.A. No.7404 of 2024           2


         Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2024

                           ORDER

The application is filed under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the sole

accused in Crime No. 100/2024 of the Kollam Excise

Range Office, Kollam, which is registered against him for

allegedly committing the offences punishable under

Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1 of

1077. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to

judicial custody on 29.08.2024.

2. The crux of the prosecution case is that:

on 29.08.2024, at around 18:50 hours, the accused was

found in conscious possession of 5 litres of arrack, which

was meant for sale. The accused was arrested on the

spot with the contraband article. Thus, the accused has

committed the above offences.

3. Heard; Sri. K. Siju, the learned counsel 2024:KER:73213

appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Seetha. S., the

learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner

submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the

accusations levelled against him. There is no material to

substantiate the petitioner's involvement in the crime.

The Investigating Office has deliberately implicated the

petitioner as an accused due to his previous animosity.

The petitioner has been in judicial custody since

29.08.2024, the investigation in the case is complete,

and recovery has been effected. Hence, the petitioner

may be released on bail.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed

the application. The Investigating Officer has filed a bail

objection report, inter alia, contending that the

petitioner is a habitual offender since he is involved in

five other crimes of a similar nature. If the petitioner is

released on bail, he would commit a similar offence.

Hence, the application may be dismissed.

2024:KER:73213

6. The prosecution case is that, the petitioner

was found in conscious possession of 5 litres of arrack.

He was arrested on the spot with the contraband article.

It is well settled in Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home

Secy., State of Bihar [(1980) 1 SCC 81] that merely

because an accused has same criminal antecedents, the

same shall not be treated as a ground to deny bail to an

accused. The fact remains that the petitioner has been in

judicial custody for the last 37 days, the investigation in

the case is complete, and the recovery has been effected.

7. On an anxious consideration of the facts, the

rival submissions made across the Bar, and the materials

placed on record, especially on considering the fact that

the petitioner has been in judicial custody since

29.08.2024, that the contraband involved in the case is

of a small quantity, that the investigation in the case is

practically complete, and that the recovery has been

effected, I am of the view that the petitioner's further 2024:KER:73213

detention is unnecessary. Hence, the petitioner is

entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed, by

directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him

executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand

only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to

the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which

shall be subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m till the filing of the final report.

Thereafter, he shall also appear before the Investigating Officer on every third Saturday of every month till 9 a.m. and 11 a.m till the conclusion of the trial in Crime No.100/2024;

(ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever;

2024:KER:73213

(iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail;

(iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond;

(v) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction limits of the Court of Session, Kollam, without the previous permission of the jurisdictional court.

(vi) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.

(vii) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be moved and entertained by the court below.

(viii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect 2024:KER:73213

recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE mtk/03.10.2024 2024:KER:73213

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 7404/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 THE REMAND REPORT DATED 29.8.2024 SUBMITTED IN C.R NO.100/2024 OF KOLLAM EXCISE RANGE BEFORE THE JFMC, KOLLAM

Annexure A2 THE COPY OF ORDER IN CRL.M.P NO.

5041/2024 DATED 31.8.2024 ON THE FILE OF JFMC-I, KOLLAM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter