Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Annamma Oommen vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28725 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28725 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Annamma Oommen vs The State Of Kerala on 3 October, 2024

                                                      2024:KER:73296
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

    THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946

                        WP(C) NO. 34367 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

          ANNAMMA OOMMEN
          AGED 50 YEARS
          WIFE OF VARGHEESE K V, FULL TIME MENIAL, ST. THOMAS
          HIGH SCHOOL, NIRANAM WEST KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM P O,
          THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT (RESIDING AT
          MALIPPURATH, KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM P O, THIRUVALLA,
          PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689621), PIN - 689621


          BY ADVS.
          V.A.MUHAMMED
          V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR




RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
          GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE II,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
          OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

    3     THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
          OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
          PATHANAMTHITTA @ THIRUVALLA, PIN - 689101

    4     THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
          OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA,
          PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689101
 WP(C) NO. 34367 OF 2024          2


                                                    2024:KER:73296
    5     THE MANAGER (THOMAS KURIAN)
          ST. THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL, NIRANAM WEST KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM
          P O, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689621
          (RESIDING AT PULLIPPADAVIL PUTTEPURACKAL, ANJILITHANAM
          P O, THIRUVALLA), PIN - 689621



OTHER PRESENT:

          ADV MARY BEENA JOSEPH-GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 34367 OF 2024            3


                                                         2024:KER:73296




              Dated this the 03rd day of October, 2024
                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner was appointed as Full Time Menial by the 5 th

respondent, from 06.12.2013 onwards on daily wages. However,

the appointment of the petitioner was not approved by the

Educational Authorities on the reason that the petitioner was aged

38 years and 6 months on the date of appointment and therefore

was beyond the age limit prescribed as per the relevant rules. The

petitioner, challenged the same before the statutory authorities

which was turned down, and ultimately the same was challenged

before this Court by filing WP(C) No.5874/2021 which was

dismissed as per Ext.P16 judgment, by following the principles laid

down in W.P.(C) No.14349/2019. Even though the said judgment

was challenged by the petitioner before a Division Bench of this

Court, as per Ext.P17, the findings of the learned single judge were

upheld. However, the petitioner was permitted to make a

representation before the Government within two weeks from the

2024:KER:73296 date of pronouncement of the judgment and the Government was

directed to consider the same within three months. Accordingly, the

petitioner submitted Ext.P8 representation, which was rejected as

per Ext.P19.

2. This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner in such

circumstances. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner,

the learned Government Pleader, I do not find any scope to

entertain this writ petition. This is particularly because, all the

contentions with regard to the right of the petitioner to get the age

limit relaxed, have been considered by this Court and rejected as

per Ext.P16. The same was upheld in Ext.P17 and the only relief

granted to the petitioner in Ext.P17 judgment by the Division Bench

of this Court was that, a permission to submit a representation

before the Government so as to enable the Government to exercise

the discretion in the matter. The Government has considered the

same as per Ext.P19, and the same is rejected. Since, all the

contentions with regard to the merits of denial of approval has been

already considered by this court in the earlier writ petition, the

challenge raised by the petitioner in this writ petition would amount

2024:KER:73296 to re-agitation of the issues already decided by this Court, which is

not permissible.

In such circumstances, I do not find any scope to entertain

this writ petition, and accordingly, it is dismissed.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE mus

2024:KER:73296

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34367/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P-1 TRUE COY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.12.2007 ALONG WITH TYPED COPY

EXHIBIT P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT DATED 06.12.2013 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT ALONG WITH TYPED COPY

EXHIBIT P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. B4/9239/2013/K. DIS DATED 04/07/2014OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B3/8875/2014 DATED 16/12/2014 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT ALONG WITH TYPED COPY

EXHIBIT P-5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. N2/91/2016/G.EDN DATED 18/11/2016 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P-6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER DATED 16/01/2017

EXHIBIT P-7 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE SSLC BOOK OF THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE LAST GRADE SERVICE RULES

EXHIBIT P-9 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF PUBLIC SERVICES (RAISING OF UPPER AGE LIMIT FOR APPOINTMENT RULES, 1978

EXHIBIT P-10 TRUE COPY OF THE G O (MS.) NO.

203/2013/G.EDN. DATED 02/97/2013

EXHIBIT P-11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C) NO.

30430/2016 DATED 13/02/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

2024:KER:73296 EXHIBIT P-12 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 07/07/2017

EXHIBIT P-13 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W P (C) NO.

23243/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 15/12/2020

EXHIBIT P-14 TRUE COPY OF THE G O (RT.) NO.

1829/2021/G.EDN. DATED 22/02/2021

EXHIBIT P-15 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (MS.) NO. 28/12/P&ARD DATED 20/06/2012

EXHIBIT P-16 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C) NO.

5874/2021 DATED 14.02.2024

EXHIBIT P-17 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO.

335/2024 DATED 05.03.2024

EXHIBIT P-18 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.03.2024

EXHIBIT P-19 TRUE COPY OF THE G O (RT.) NO.

4329/2024/G.EDN DATED 10.07.2024

EXHIBIT P-20 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (RT.) NO.

3405/2024/G.EDN DATED 30.05.2024

EXHIBIT P-21 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (RT.) NO.

1262/2022/G.EDN DATED 03.03.2022

EXHIBIT P-22 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. DGE/12247/ 2022/C2 DATED 12.09.2022

EXHIBIT P-23 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (RT.) NO.

5339/2022/G.EDN DATED 12.09.2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter