Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28707 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024
2024:KER:73230
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 11TH ASWINA, 1946
MFA (FOREST) NO. 450 OF 1982
APPELLANTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
RREPRERSENTED BY THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, VESTED
FORESTS, KOZHIKODE.
2 CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, VESTED FORESTS, KOZHIKODE AND
CUSTODIAN OF VESTED FORESTS, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.
SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN (FORESTS)
RESPONDENTS:
1 CHERIYA MAMMU HAJI,
S/O ABDULLA HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2 KUNHAYAMMAD,
S/O UMMERKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
3 MAHAMOOD HAJI,
S/O UMMERKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
4 KUNHUMATHA,
D/O UMMERKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
5 MOIDU HAJI,
S/O UMMERKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
6 KOYAMANKUTTY HAJI,
S/O SAINABA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -2-
7 KUNHALIMA UMMA,
D/O SAINABA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
8 MAYANKUTTY,
S/O SAINABA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
9 UMMUL KULSU,
D/O MOOSA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
10 ABDUL SAMED,
S/O BEEVI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
11 UMMERKUTTY,
S/O IBRAHIM, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
12 KOYAMUTTY,
S/O IBRAHIM, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
13 MARIUMMA,
D/O IBRAHIM, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
14 KUNHABDULLA,
S/O ATHRUMANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
15 KUNHAYISHU,
D/O ATHRUMANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
16 KUNHIPATHU,
D/O KUNHAMMED, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
17 RABIA,
D/O KUNHAYISHU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -3-
18 ZUBAIR,
S/O KUNHAYISHU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
19 AYISHUMMA,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
20 IBRAHIM
S/O AAMED, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
21 ZAINABA,
D/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
22 ABDUL RAHIMAN,
S/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
23 KUNHAMMACHA,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
24 MARIAMMA,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
25 ABOOBACKER,
S/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
26 KADEESUMMA
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
27 ABDUL HAMEED,
S/O ABDUL RAHIMAN HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
28 CHERIYA BEEVI,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -4-
29 KUNHU MOHAMMED
S/O HASSANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
30 ABDUL RAZAK
S/O HASSANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
31 CHERIYA AYISHUMU,
D/O ABDULLA HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
32 PATHUTTY,
D/O MAMMU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
33 KUNHIBI,
D/O MAMMU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
34 KUNHANBA,
D/O MAMMU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
35 KOYOTTY,
S/O SIYYALI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
36 BEEVI,
D/O UPPERI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
37 ABDURAHIMANKUTTY ALIAS ATHRUMANKUTTY,
S/O UMMERKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
38 MAMMU,
S/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
39 ZAINABA,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -5-
40 ABDUL RAZACK,
S/O HASSANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
41 PATHUTTY,
D/O HASSANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
42 MAYIMU,
D/O HASSANKUTTY, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
43 MORIYUMMU,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
44 MAYIMU,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
45 ZERINA,
D/O MAHMOOD, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
46 ABDUL SUKHOOR,
S/O MAHMOOD, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
47 PATHIMATHU ZUHARA,
D/O UNNI MAYAN, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
48 HASSANKUTTY,
S/O KUNHI THERUVAI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
49 KUNHUMMACHA,
D/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
50 ABDULLA,
S/O KUNHAMMED, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -6-
51 ABDUL AZEEZ,
S/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
52 MOHAMMED,
S/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
53 CHERIYA KHADEESA,
D/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
54 HAFSATH,
D/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
55 RUKHIATH
D/O ABDUL RAHIMAN HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
56 MUSTAFA,
S/O MAMMU HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
57 ABDUL MAJEED,
S/O MAMMU HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
58 KUNHIMATHA,
D/O MOOSA HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
59 ABDUL KHAYUM,
S/O MOOSA HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
60 THAHA,
S/O MOOSA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
61 KUNHAMMA,
D/O KOYAMONKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -7-
62 HARRIS,
S/O MAHMOOD, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
63 SULFIKAR,
S/O ABDULLA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
64 ILLIAS,
S/O MOHAMMED, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
65 MOHAMMED ANWAR,
S/O ABOOBACKER, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
66 KUNHAMMED,
S/O HASSANKUTTY HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI
HOUSE, POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
67 ABDUL NAZER,
S/O MARIAMMA, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
68 ASHRAF,
S/O KUNHIBI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
69 SAIBUNNISSA,
D/O UMMER KULSU, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
70 HASSANKUTTY,
S/O ABDULLA HAJI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE,
POST BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
71 ATHRUMANKUTTY,
S/O ULPERI, PUTHIYAMADATHUMMAL PERUNGADI HOUSE, POST
BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.
S.K. SAJU
SIDHARTH O.
BALU TOM
BONNY BENNY
2024:KER:73230
MFA(FOREST)NO.450/1982 -8-
M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.)
K.NOORUDHEEN
R.SUDHIR
PHILIP ANTONY CHACKO
S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
R.SREEHARI
SUSANTH SHAJI
MOHAMMED ASIF P.
ALBIN A. JOSEPH
THIS MFA (FOREST) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 03.10.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:73230
SATHISH NINAN &
JOHNSON JOHN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
M.F.A.(Forest) No.450 of 1982
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2024
J U D G M E N T
Sathish Ninan, J.
The State is in appeal, challenging the order of the
Forest Tribunal granting exemption to the respondents-
applicants under Section 3(3) of the Kerala Private Forest
(Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to
as "the Vesting Act").
2. The original application contains two schedules: 'A'
schedule having an extent of 13,000 acres and 'B' schedule
having an extent of 1,235 acres. 'B' Schedule is stated to
be a portion of 'A' schedule.
3. According to the applicants, the 'A' schedule
property belongs to the Puthiya Madathummal Peringadi Tarwad
of the applicants. Their title and possession of the
property has been declared by the Munsiff's Court, Koyilandy
in OS 242/1940 under Ext.P2 judgment. While the fact that
the properties are vested forest is not disputed, it is
2024:KER:73230
claimed that the applicants are entitled to exemption under
Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act in respect of the 'B'
schedule property since they hold the same with the intent
to cultivate.
4. The State contended that the properties are included
in VFC Nos.4 and 54 which cover an extent of 3382.873 acres.
The claim for exemption was challenged.
5. The Tribunal, as per the impugned order, held that
the applicants are entitled to exemption under Section 3(3)
of the Vesting Act with respect to 1020 acres from the 'B'
schedule.
6. We have heard Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan, the learned
Special Government Pleader for the appellant, and the
learned Senior Counsel Sri.M.Ramesh Chander on behalf of the
respondents-applicants.
7. The points that arise for determination are:-
(i) Have the applicants established the ingredients under Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act, entitling an order exempting the 'B' schedule property from vesting?
2024:KER:73230
(ii) Is the identity of the 'B' schedule property established?
(iii) Does the order of the Tribunal warrant any interference?
(iv) Is the additional evidence sought to be produced in the appeal under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, liable to be admitted ?
8. Section 3 of the Vesting Act provides for vesting of
private forests in the State, on the appointed day i.e,
10.05.1971. Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act provides for
exemption from vesting if the ingredients as mentioned
therein are satisfied. Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act reads
thus: -
"(3) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply in respect of so much extent of private forests held by an owner under a valid registered document of title executed before the appointed day and intended for cultivation by him, which together with other lands held by him to which Chapter III of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, is applicable, does not exceed the extent of the ceiling area applicable to him under Section 82 of the said Act."
As per the Section, to secure exemption, the following
conditions are to be satisfied:
2024:KER:73230
(i) The property must be held by the owner.
(ii) Such holding must be under a registered document
of title executed before the appointed day.
(iii) It must be held with an intention to cultivate.
(iv) The extent of the property, when taken along with
the other properties of the owner, should not exceed the
ceiling limit fixed under Section 82 of the Kerala Land
Reforms Act.
If the above ingredients are satisfied, such property is
liable to be exempted from vesting.
9. A reading of the judgment of the Tribunal shows
that, the consideration was with regard to the availability
of registered title deed of the applicants and whether they
are holding land in excess of the ceiling limit. As to
whether the other ingredients have been satisfied or not was
not considered at all. Unless the applicants satisfy all the
conditions noted above, they cannot secure exemption from
vesting. The order of the Tribunal is liable to be
2024:KER:73230
interfered with for that sole reason.
10. As noticed, the 'B' schedule property in the
original application is 1235 acres from out of the 'A'
schedule having an extent of 13000 acres. In the description
of the 'B' schedule to the OA, its four boundaries are shown
as "remaining property", indicating that it is bounded on
all four sides by the remaining extent of the 'A' schedule.
The 'B' schedule was not identified in any manner. No
commission was taken out. Without identifying the property
an order of exemption could not have been granted.
11. So also, though the claim is for exemption of the
'B' schedule having an extent of 1235 acres from out of the
'A' schedule, the Tribunal has granted exemption for an
extent of 1020 acres, which is lesser than the 'B' schedule.
The identity of the said 1020 acres is not established. For
the said reason also the order of the Tribunal cannot be
sustained.
2024:KER:73230
12. The learned Special Government Pleader took us to
the relief claimed in the OA and contended that a reading of
the same reveals that the applicants are even uncertain
about the identity of the property over which they claim
exemption. The relief claimed in the OA reads thus :-
"So this Honourable Tribunal may be pleased to declare that the 'B' schedule property or any other area from 'A' schedule property which this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper, is not a vested forest and the petitioners are entitled to possess the same for their personal cultivation under Section 3(3) of Act 26/71."
Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act provides for exemption on
the ground of intention to cultivate. Such intention must be
evinced with reference to the appointed day ie: 10.05.1971.
Even in the OA the applicants are not definite/specific
regarding the identity of the property over which they claim
to have had the intention to cultivate as on the appointed
day. Hence the argument of the counsel cannot be brushed
aside.
2024:KER:73230
13. On the findings above, the order of the Forest
Tribunal is liable to be interfered with. With regard to the
satisfaction of the ingredients of Section 3(3), the only
evidence available is that of PW1. Since there has been
failure to consider the satisfaction of the ingredients of
Section 3(3), we are of the opinion that the Tribunal could
be directed to reconsider the matter. Opportunity could be
afforded to both sides to amend their pleadings and to
adduce further evidence.
14. The appellant has filed IA 1/2024 under Order XLI
Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking production
of additional documents/evidence. In the affidavit filed in
support of the application it is stated that they were
unaware of the existence of such documents. According to the
appellant the said documents establish that the applicant's
Tarwad had alienated the entire extent of property held by
them, to various persons, during the period from 1940 to
1965, and that no property remained with the Tarwad. The
2024:KER:73230
documents are certified copies of the registered assignment
deeds. A bare perusal of the documents suggests that they
are relevant to determine the claim in the OA since Section
3(3) of the Act requires that the property must be held by
the owner and with an intention to cultivate. In the light
of the liberty being granted to the parties, under this
judgment, to adduce further evidence, it shall be open to
the appellant to produce the documents before the Tribunal.
To enable the same the additional evidence sought to be
produced before this Court could be returned to the
appellant.
15. With regard to the ingredient of the Section that
the property must be held under a registered document of
title, according to the applicants they had obtained title
much prior to the coming into force of the registration laws
in the Malabar area of the State wherein the property is
situated, and that their title and possession of the
property has been declared by the civil court in Ext.P2
2024:KER:73230
judgment in OS 242/1940. The findings in Ext.P2 judgment
need to be given due consideration. However, the property
has not been identified with reference to Ext.P3 plan
prepared in Ext.P2 suit.
16. The learned counsel for the applicants would
contend that the memorandum of appeal does not urge any
ground denying their right, title or possession and also
about the alleged alienations, and hence cannot be argued.
We are unable to agree with the submission of the learned
counsel. In ground (2) raised in the memorandum, the title
and possession of the property of the applicants are denied.
By virtue of the additional documents sought to be produced
in the appeal under Order XLI Rule 27, the appellant seeks
to establish the said contention. That apart, it is well
settled that the burden rests squarely on the applicant to
prove that he is entitled to the benefit of the exclusion
under Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act. Therefore, it is for
the applicants to establish satisfaction of the ingredients.
2024:KER:73230
17. With regard to identity of the property, it is a
ground available even on the pleadings of the applicants
themselves. At any rate, without establishing the identity,
the applicants would not be entitled to an order for
exemption.
18. The learned counsel for the applicants would urge
that, the alleged lease, the certified copy of which is
produced as Annexure-1, violates Section 8 of the Mappila
Marumakkathayam Act, which was applicable to the parties and
hence is void. Such lease, if at all could have been
created, the written consent of the majority of the members
of the Tarwad was necessary, it is argued. The learned
Special Government Pleader for the appellant would point out
that, the said document contains a recital that such written
consent was obtained. We do not think that it is necessary
or proper for us to go into such contentions at this stage
since, as indicated by us earlier, the matter needs to go
back to the Tribunal for fresh disposal. All the rival
2024:KER:73230
contentions are to be urged before the Tribunal.
In the result, this appeal is allowed. The order of the
Tribunal is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the
Tribunal for disposal afresh. Both sides shall be permitted
to amend their pleadings and to adduce further evidence if
they so choose. It is clarified that all the rival
contentions are left open. We are sure that the Tribunal
would take note of the fact that the OA is of the year 1981
and make every endeavour for expeditious disposal of the
case.
Parties to appear before the Tribunal on 21.10.2024.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
Sd/-
JOHNSON JOHN JUDGE kns/-
//True Copy// P.S. To Judge APPENDIX OF MFA (FOREST) 450/1982
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE COPIES OF THE DOCUMENT NO.20/1965 OF KOZHIKODE SRO(CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE ANNEXURE- 1IN RP NO.14/1984)
Annexure A2 DOCUMENT NO.39/1961 OF KOZHIKODE SRO (CERTIFIED COPIES OF ANNEXURE -11 IN RP NO.14/1984)
Annexure A3 CERTIFIED COPIES OF DOCUMENT NO.710/1940 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE,PERAMBRA
Annexure A4 DOCUMENT NO.360/1943 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THALASSERY
Annexure A5 DOCUMENT NO.383/1943 OF SOB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THALASSERY
Annexure A6 DOCUMENT NO.1030/1956 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THALASSERY
Annexure A7 DOCUMENT NO.1038/1956 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THALASSERY
Annexure A8 DOCUMENT NO.1039/1956 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, THALASSERRY
Annexure A9 TRUE COPY OF FELLING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VIDE PROCEEDINGS DATED 13.04.1973 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-1X
-----
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!