Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mashooq Ali @ Babu Khan vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 33604 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33604 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Mashooq Ali @ Babu Khan vs Union Of India on 21 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 6804 OF 2024
                                        1




                                                              2024:KER:87493
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

      THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                           CRL.MC NO. 6804 OF 2024

         AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 19.03.2024 IN CRMP NO.54/2024

 IN RC NO.1 OF 2023 OF SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF NIA CASES,ERNAKULAM

PETITIONER/CLAIMANT :

              MASHOOQ ALI @ BABU KHAN
              AGED 60 YEARS
              RESIDING AT A209,
              SHAHEEN BAGH, JAMIA NAGAR,
              OKHLA, SOUTH DELHI, PIN - 110 025.


              BY ADVS.
              ABRAHAM P.GEORGE
              M.SANTHY




RESPONDENT/S:

              UNION OF INDIA
              PRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY,
              KOCHI THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA
              ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 031.



              SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.11.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 6804 OF 2024
                                                   2




                                                                                    2024:KER:87493
                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                          ......................................................
                                   Crl.M.C.No.6804 of 2024
                           ...................................................
                      Dated this the 21st day of November, 2024


                                               ORDER

Petitioner is the father of Sri.Shahbaz Khan, against whom, a notice was

issued by the National Investigation Agency (for brevity, 'NIA') under Section

160 of Cr.P.C. directing him to appear before them. In the meantime, a

search was conducted at the petitioner's residence on 11.05.2023 and an

amount of Rs.5,39,700/- was seized from the cupboard inside his bedroom.

Thereafter, petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.54/2024 before the Special Court of

Trial of NIA Cases, Ernakulam for release of the amount. By the impugned

order, the Special Court allowed the application and directed release of the

amount on condition that petitioner executes a bond for Rs.5,00,000/- with

two solvent sureties each for the like sum. Petitioner challenges the

aforesaid order to the extent it imposed the aforesaid condition.

2. I have heard Sri.Abraham P. George, the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as Senior Panel Counsel, on behalf of the respondents.

3. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is noticed that the NIA had filed a

report stating that they have no objection for releasing the amount to the CRL.MC NO. 6804 OF 2024

2024:KER:87493 petitioner. It was also stated that the amount seized was, not even included

as an object in the final report. Before this Court also, the learned Senior

Panel counsel reiterated that NIA has no objection for releasing the amount,

and also that petitioner's son is not arrayed as an accused as of now.

4. Since the currency seized from the petitioner is not included as an object in

the final report and petitioner's son is not even arrayed as an accused by the

NIA, the seizure of the amount from the petitioner has no connection with

the case under consideration and hence there is no need to retain the same.

Imposing a condition for releasing the said amount and directing the sureties

also to execute a bond of the same amount renders the condition too

onerous. I am satisfied that the said condition is required to be deleted to

the extent it directs the sureties to execute a bond is required to be deleted.

5. Accordingly, the condition in the impugned order directing execution of a

bond for an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- by the petitioner and each of the

sureties shall stand deleted. Petitioner, however, shall execute a simple bond

without any sureties for release of the amount.

The Crl.M.C. is allowed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/21/11/2024 CRL.MC NO. 6804 OF 2024

2024:KER:87493

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE AI CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.03.2024 IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.54/2023 IN RC NO.01/2023/NIA/KOC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter